Topic: History: Spanish flu, Over 50 million death. (Read 333 times)

actually covid-19 is the same as the common cold but what is very frightening is that there are more people who do not feel that they have been exposed to covid-19, this is what makes many people not pay attention to this because they just feel healthy. and the retention of covid-19 is being exposed to those whose immunity is weak because there is already a congenital disease and especially for those over 50 years of age because disrupted lung work results in all other organ functions being disrupted.

You are right on this. I have not seen such record too. Much record of people died are those with chronic health condition before the attack of the virus. And surely because they had a failing health situation, that got their system prone to a new infestation or infestion as the immunity level has dropped.

Example, someone who is battling with respiratory infection will have more complication with a new attack of virus/disease.

Living a healthy life style, is a therapy for prevention.

Stats don't say "virus." Proof for virus wasn't there back then since they didn't have electron microscopes to see them. Stats are what people dreamed up to put down on paper. They didn't really know that viruses even existed back then.

For all we know, the plague back then might have been some kind of gas emitted by a passing asteroid that nobody saw in any telescope... a gas that gradually dissipated over a year or two.


If NASA didn't see the asteroid until it was past, why would anybody think that the doctors back in 1918 knew much of anything? In fact, they didn't know much of anything. How can we tell? The plague existed. Given all their knowledge, they didn't actually contain the plague.

Writings about what the plague was came after. They had to call it something. So they made a stab in the dark, and wrote down whatever they wrote. And that is what we have recorded in history... even though nobody really knows what that plague was.

stats say out of 1000 tested positive(mild symptoms) 4000 to 9000 without symptoms
stats say out of 1000 tested positive(mild symptoms) 100 need hospital care

so out of 5k to 10k 100 need hospital care 1-2%
without hospitals the death rate would be 1-2%(70m-140m world pop in a non healthcare world)
..
luckily we have a healthcare system so numbers are better than this
so if you factor in the healthcare where there are low case numbers going to hospital meaning they can be treated efficiently and given all the care they need the rate of death is about 3 out of 100 hospitalisations
3 of 5-10k(0.03%-0.06%)

however at the peak of patient admissions where they were turning away mild patients to prioritise the severe the was a death rate of 30 out of 100(0.3%-0.6% of 5k-10k)

so having too many sick at any one time can cause less people to be treated early. thus more deaths, and also more deaths indirectly from those not with covid, but other illnesses that wont get treatment while doctors are concentrating on covid patients

meaning if there is a 1-2% hospitalisation rate. but only a 0.02% bed capacity rate covid(0.18% other care)
for each million people with only 200 beds available
you can only have 200 in hospital for 2 weeks =10k-20k spread a fortnight

trying to keep a stable spread of only 200 hospitalisations is tough because natural spread is exponential not stable/flat

using the weekly spread numbers, thus only having 100 bed circulation a week
EG low figures(10k infect 100 hospital(1%)) and the R0 rate of 3
spread: 50   150    450     1350    4050    12,150
hospitl:  1      1       4         13        40        121
deaths:  0      0       0          1         2          24*

*3 death out of 100 even with treatment and 21 death due to not having a bed so dying without treatment

10k a week/m spread=100 weeks for 'full population'=2 years.
but trying to keep it to 10k spread to only have 100 hospitalisations to only have 3 deaths. not easy
as you can see by haw easy the r0 can cause more than 10k, thus more than 100 beds thus more than 3 deaths very quickly

....
anyway governments mistakes were 2 things
1. when china closed its flights but many countries actually organised their own repatriation flights to bring people from china back to their home country
2. when they started getting cases in other countries they didnt isolate those people. they only reacted once it started affecting the limitations of hospital capacity

some countries like thailand closed itself off when it has less than 50 symptomatic cases(weeks before the west). and yep they have been over 80 days clear of any thai person being symptomatic
same cant be said for US/UK who ignored health protection advice and prefered the economic protection model.

though the virus cant be completely irradicated because it will just come back in waves,, reducing how hard it can hit in one go could have been done better in many cases
asia for decades/centuries have respected personal space, they bow or put hands together in a praying gesture to welcome people. western countries still cough into their hand and shake hands with people.
though the fist bump is starting to become popular. its not as effecting as distant gestures like bowing

UK centuries ago used to 'tip the hat' and had hankerchiefs.. but they started to copy french(cheek kissing) and hand shaking by saying it is an act of trust that you dont fear the other person having something contagious
(yep its like tapping beer glasses together to make a toast as a gesture you dont fear poison being passed glass to glass as a act of trust of the person serving the drink.. an act of defiance against health precaution in those times that caught on as a trend)

The gap of occurrence between the pandemic is long but what makes the COVID deadly is the impact it created chaos in the world's economy
we are billions now population is more bigger than the population in the Spanish flu and because we are so crowded so many country cannot keep up with distancing but the good thing is we have an advancement in science and medicine that we can deal with it.

Maybe some of the money wasted on "Climate Change" could be put to use on these issues. But don't hold your breath...

This is what I am implying, the past should be a lesson for the governments to know the right step to take in order for such viruses and bacteria not to breakout like before again, all preventive measure must be taking. There are a lot we humans must put into place that we are lacking. Not only depending much on one aspect like vaccine creation. Also, like I implied above, prevention is better aspect of life than cure, but cure should be the alternative.


You are right about this. Also, the vaccine may not even be the weakened form of the virus, it can be another similar virus that cause less negative effect. For example, covid-19 is a Coronavirus but the Russian vaccine is prepared from Adenovirus not weakened form of Coronavirus. But, weakened form of Coronavirus can also be used and have positive results (maybe). But that does not still change the fact for the governments to focus more on natural immunity and preventive measures.

If a vaccine is a weakened form of the virus, then it is synthetic and the response is not natural. Gi ing the vaccine to a person with natural immunity messes up that immunity.

I would also point out that nobody has claimed the reward for documentting a healthy person who has died solely from the virus

No, you are not the only pro-vaccine person here. Most simply ignore these arguments and I admit to also finding them dull and uninteresting.

The Spanish Flu and the Black Death, and other historical pandemics, are all worth studying for comparative purposes. Our response to Covid will be a model for our response to future pandemics, whether good or bad.

Many people were infected with the flu the deadliest in human history. This is more than the number of people killed in the First World War. At that time a quarter of the world's population died from the virus. Like the coronavirus it spread to many parts of the world. Both Germany and Britain, including America, suffered greatly. But if adequate vaccines are not available the death toll will continue to rise.

They're not mutually exclusive; they're the same thing.

Do you agree that exposure to mild pathogens in everyday life helps to boost the immune system? That, for example, a lot of the allergies that are so common these days are due in part to kids being brought up in overly sanitised environments?

Vaccines work by exposing the body to a weakened form of the virus, in order to train the immune system to repel the real thing.

If we don't have vaccines, we are effectively going into battle unprepared. We've discussed polio before. How about smallpox? Diptheria? Are you really contending that a world with no vaccines against these would be preferable? What about rising cases of measles due to anti-vaxxers?

You can't foster a good immune system if you allow yourself to be vaccinated. The concepts are mutually exclusive

Sleeping well, eating a healthy diet, sunbathing / optimizing vitamin D levels, etc. do not stop the spread of a pandemic, either.
A lot of the time, it does feel like I'm the only pro-vaccine person on this forum...

I agree that the pharmaceutical industry make huge profits and a lot of it is highly immoral. You don't have to look any further than Martin Shkreli to understand that this is the case. But the pharmaceutical industry also saves lives. Like most things, there are good and bad aspects.

I also agree that fostering a healthy immune system through sensible diet and exercise is a very good idea. A healthy immune system improves your chances of a good outcome whatever ailment you contract. It lessens the chances of severe effects, it lessens the chances of dying.... but it doesn't prevent these things, it doesn't magically confer immunity.

I am worried that there is much more talk of vaccines and drugs than of strengthening the immune system, as has been mentioned.

But of course, that doesn't sell. Sleeping well, eating a healthy diet, sunbathing / optimizing vitamin D levels, etc. do not give profits to the pharmaceutical industry.

I think what Jet Cash is implying is that the the world is moving from olden natural food era to modern processing food days, in addition are what we are now exposed to that we are not exposed to before. That, these are affecting our immunity. That the world are diverting much more towards drugs and vaccines. Why don't they also focus more on ways to prevent disease by researching more on the use of natural food to feed and also reducing the environmental toxic chemicals that could have long term side effects on our health.

Early vaccines were intended to eradicate diseases. Modern vaccines are designed to take control of immune systems, and thus give control of health and longevity to a ruling elite. Even in the early days, a healthy person could probably recover from the diseases, given that they had a healthy body, and observed a sensible recovery process - no bleeding for example, and no automatic fever reduction.

Yes, they were discovered in humans in the 30's. Possibly been with us for much longer. Certainly this one won't just go away by itself, and will mutate.


Yes, a healthy immune system is vital. But vaccination is a huge help on top of that. What would your argument be in response to the below, from the Russian vaccine thread?

Yeah, guess that's something that we should be somehow grateful for. We have technologies now that helped us mitigate and cure those who've been affected. Though there have been millions of cases also around the world because of covid, at least it's not that many compared to the number who died because of the Spanish flu.

If we are considering which is the deadliest pandemic in (recorded) human history, then it has to be the Black Death in the 14th century.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Death
Estimated death toll is between 75 and 200 million... which as a proportion of the population at the time was absolutely huge. It took a couple of hundred years for population numbers to recover.
One positive effect - probably the only positive effect - was that the death of so many workers led to a power shift - with workers in such short supply, they became valuable - which led to the demise of feudalism. https://www.ancient.eu/article/1543/effects-of-the-black-death-on-europe/

Corona viruses have been around since the 1930s, and many others have been here for longer. There is no reason to believe that it will go away, it will just mutate. I have lived through 4 pandemics with no significant problems or side effects - this virus is the fourth. I have done this without any vaccination or pharmaceuticals for over 60 years. There is no substitute for a healthy natural immune system. After all, it has allowed us to increase and prosper despite all the health risks that are supposed to destroy us.

The biggest risks we have are fake news that spreads panic and stupid behaviour. banking theft and fraud that destroys the economy, and the pharmaceutical industry that destroys our health, and forces us to eat unhealthy foods.