HMRC makes statement on Bitcoin in New Scientist

guybrushthreepwood

legendary

Activity: 1232

Merit: 1195

Quote from: franky1 on January 15, 2014, 01:51:13 PM

Quote from: guybrushthreepwood on January 15, 2014, 01:45:23 PM

Quote from: yatsey87 on January 15, 2014, 01:38:06 PM

Quote from: Findeton on June 04, 2011, 07:42:06 AM

That's good news!

Glad to know I'm not gonna be thrown in jail for holding Bitcoins.

They wont through you in jail, but they'll be watching the exchanges and come down on you like a ton of bricks if you trade your coins for cash and don't pay taxes on it. I'd stick to face to face trades if you're selling a lot of coins. Or just pay your taxes Cheesy

in actual fact they dont inspect or watch exchanges, they just look at your bank accounts for amounts over your tax free threshold. nothing has changed in the last few decades, this is how HMRC has always worked.

this is mainly done if they get a tip-off. government agencys work mainly retroactive in regards to general public. they only work pro-active inregards to people or communications that highlight valuable information.

Interesting, but are you sure this is the case? Sources etc? I know they don't have the resources to go after everyone who's diddling their taxes, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they went after a few big Bitcoin busts to put the fear out there.

franky1

legendary

Activity: 4424

Merit: 4794

Quote from: guybrushthreepwood on January 15, 2014, 01:45:23 PM

Quote from: yatsey87 on January 15, 2014, 01:38:06 PM

Quote from: Findeton on June 04, 2011, 07:42:06 AM

That's good news!

Glad to know I'm not gonna be thrown in jail for holding Bitcoins.

They wont through you in jail, but they'll be watching the exchanges and come down on you like a ton of bricks if you trade your coins for cash and don't pay taxes on it. I'd stick to face to face trades if you're selling a lot of coins. Or just pay your taxes Cheesy

in actual fact they dont inspect or watch exchanges, they just look at your bank accounts for amounts over your tax free threshold. nothing has changed in the last few decades, this is how HMRC has always worked.

this is mainly done if they get a tip-off. government agencys work mainly retroactive in regards to general public. they only work pro-active inregards to people or communications that highlight valuable information.

guybrushthreepwood

legendary

Activity: 1232

Merit: 1195

Quote from: yatsey87 on January 15, 2014, 01:38:06 PM

Quote from: Findeton on June 04, 2011, 07:42:06 AM

That's good news!

Glad to know I'm not gonna be thrown in jail for holding Bitcoins.

They wont through you in jail, but they'll be watching the exchanges and come down on you like a ton of bricks if you trade your coins for cash and don't pay taxes on it. I'd stick to face to face trades if you're selling a lot of coins. Or just pay your taxes Cheesy

yatsey87

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 509

Quote from: Findeton on June 04, 2011, 07:42:06 AM

That's good news!

Glad to know I'm not gonna be thrown in jail for holding Bitcoins.

BitDreams

hero member

Activity: 503

Merit: 501

I wish we could get that statement from the IRS in the United States. I am getting ready to file and I will be treating my trades like stocks.

I was fortunate in my trading. I moved Bitcoins to an exchange, bought Namecoin and Primecoin (should have got Litecoin too, my timing was good, I could have bought almost any of the alts) then the alt's had that 10x growth from less than a dollar. Eventually I traded half my alt coins positions and traded them back to regain my original position for Bitcoins. So my alt coin cost is zero but I never cashed anything into dollars.

It doesn't make sense for me to take capital gains on Bitcoin when I exchanged them for Namecoin and Primecoin but that's probably what I'll have to do for fear of getting accused of hiding something.

qfdev

newbie

Activity: 24

Merit: 0

Quote from: Barek on January 15, 2014, 12:13:42 PM

It's from 2011 though.

Things happen at snail pace in HMRC so I doubt there's much change in 2014

Barek

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

It's from 2011 though.

Lethn

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1000

I've been researching heavily into the taxes regarding Bitcoin and this is a great find, thanks.

marcus_of_augustus

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 2349

Eadem mutata resurgo

Quote from: bitk on June 05, 2011, 06:54:25 AM

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on June 05, 2011, 01:50:03 AM

Approximating 350 MHash per GPU works out about 15,000 GPU's for the network's ~5 THash/s ... so actually an overstatement.

350 MHash per GPU average? Perhaps you could re-calibrate including the nvidia vs Ati market share ^^
your figure is not so much off anyway, still I think it's quite a big number... when you say "nothing compared to everyday stuff", well, I think there's a bit more than what you think... it's a geeky thing but it's still impressive!

Yes, impressive for the computer power of the network. I'm kind of annoyed there hasn't been a slashdot article on the technical network aspect achievement alone. If nothing else it has wiped folding@home's bottom, and the hardware come together in not much more than 8 months.

In the bigger scheme power usage and hardware in the industrial sphere it is nothing. A small fraction of the gaming market or Xbox network power consumption and hardware probably even.

bitk

newbie

Activity: 25

Merit: 0

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on June 05, 2011, 01:50:03 AM

Approximating 350 MHash per GPU works out about 15,000 GPU's for the network's ~5 THash/s ... so actually an overstatement.

350 MHash per GPU average? Perhaps you could re-calibrate including the nvidia vs Ati market share ^^
your figure is not so much off anyway, still I think it's quite a big number... when you say "nothing compared to everyday stuff", well, I think there's a bit more than what you think... it's a geeky thing but it's still impressive!

jashan

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: camem on June 04, 2011, 07:21:52 AM

"HMRC, the UK government's tax-colllecting body, says people do not incur a tax liability when trading in bitcoins as long as they do not turn their profits into regular cash. Once conventional money is involved, however, the income could become taxable, HMRC told New Scientist"

That's good to know and what I thought was the case. It's probably best to check with your local tax accountant, though, since how this is handled exactly might be different in different countries. It also might change over time. Right now, I think Bitcoins can be considered a commodity, in case Bitcoins become an actual currency, things might change.

At the moment, I think buying Bitcoins is kind of like buying credits with some services (like Fotolia, for instance); but the more there is a "Bitcoin-based economy", the more countries will try to directly tax Bitcoin transactions.

I think registering with New Scientist and writing friendly letters to the editor might be a good idea :-)

marcus_of_augustus

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 2349

Eadem mutata resurgo

Quote from: ryukafalz on June 05, 2011, 03:07:56 AM

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on June 05, 2011, 01:50:03 AM

Quote from: ryukafalz on June 05, 2011, 01:37:51 AM

Quote

At present, Bitcoin's P2P
clients are crunching data at a rate equivalent to more than 50,000
high-end PC graphics processors.

This is a massive understatement. Tongue

Approximating 350 MHash per GPU works out about 15,000 GPU's for the network's ~5 THash/s ... so actually an overstatement.

Some people seem to have an agenda in wildly over-stating how much hardware and power is going into the bitcoin network. Yes it is large by computing standards but it is completely insignificant compared with other industrial activities that are happening 24 hours a day around the world, including the current banking systems.

Deepbit alone has ~2 THash/s... does it really make up that much of the network?

No agenda, just misinformed. Didn't do the math but it didn't sound like enough.

Oh, the agenda comment was not directed towards you ... the source of the source most likely. Just seen some wild numbers bandied around, 1 blow-hard was talking about how much weight of steel it represented or some such nonsense. Roll Eyes

... and his numbers were laughably wrong anyway.

ryukafalz

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on June 05, 2011, 01:50:03 AM

Quote from: ryukafalz on June 05, 2011, 01:37:51 AM

Quote

At present, Bitcoin's P2P
clients are crunching data at a rate equivalent to more than 50,000
high-end PC graphics processors.

This is a massive understatement. Tongue

Approximating 350 MHash per GPU works out about 15,000 GPU's for the network's ~5 THash/s ... so actually an overstatement.

Some people seem to have an agenda in wildly over-stating how much hardware and power is going into the bitcoin network. Yes it is large by computing standards but it is completely insignificant compared with other industrial activities that are happening 24 hours a day around the world, including the current banking systems.

Deepbit alone has ~2 THash/s... does it really make up that much of the network?

No agenda, just misinformed. Didn't do the math but it didn't sound like enough.

marcus_of_augustus

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 2349

Eadem mutata resurgo

Quote from: ryukafalz on June 05, 2011, 01:37:51 AM

Quote

At present, Bitcoin's P2P
clients are crunching data at a rate equivalent to more than 50,000
high-end PC graphics processors.

This is a massive understatement. Tongue

Approximating 350 MHash per GPU works out about 15,000 GPU's for the network's ~5 THash/s ... so actually an overstatement.

Some people seem to have an agenda in wildly over-stating how much hardware and power is going into the bitcoin network. Yes it is large by computing standards but it is completely insignificant compared with other industrial activities that are happening 24 hours a day around the world, including the current banking systems.

ryukafalz

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Quote

At present, Bitcoin's P2P
clients are crunching data at a rate equivalent to more than 50,000
high-end PC graphics processors.

This is a massive understatement. Tongue

DATA COMMANDER

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: camem

Also interesting that the mtgox guy says this about the $2000/day he (currently) makes

Someone needs to launch a competitor, pronto!

marcus_of_augustus

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 2349

Eadem mutata resurgo

Good article. Well thought out and researched.

stic.man

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

thanks

cypherdoc

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1002

Quote from: stic.man on June 04, 2011, 07:57:49 AM

Man does anyone have a subscription to that site that could post the whole article? Great find.

http://stirling-westrup-tt.blogspot.com/2011/06/tt-ns-2815-future-of-money-series.html

Bit_Happy

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1040

A Great Time to Start Something!

Quote from: Findeton on June 04, 2011, 07:42:06 AM

That's good news!

Yes

Topic: HMRC makes statement on Bitcoin in New Scientist (Read 6360 times)