would you guys be interested in a marketmaker?
The fuck is that?
Topic: HoboNickels - HBN - High Fast Stake - Version 2.0! More Secure, Less Intensive - page 107. (Read 478852 times)
April 07, 2016, 11:04:51 PM
The fuck is that?
April 07, 2016, 10:57:51 PM
would you guys be interested in a marketmaker?
April 07, 2016, 02:52:27 PM
can you all send a ticket to yobit and ask when hbn gonna be listed ?
because looks like he is just ignoring me, look like no body care
because looks like he is just ignoring me, look like no body care
not only you, i've no luck as well,
and i'm afraid it can be the same situation as allcoin.com
I sent PM to yobit user here on bitcointalk https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/yobit-406594
Let you know if any feedback
April 07, 2016, 10:09:06 AM
can you all send a ticket to yobit and ask when hbn gonna be listed ?
because looks like he is just ignoring me, look like no body care
because looks like he is just ignoring me, look like no body care
April 05, 2016, 04:36:36 PM
The coin count itself does not really matter. Each 'coin', or unspent transaction out, has value represented in 64 bits. Whether it is 100 coins or 1 million coins, it will occupy the same 64 bits, the only difference is where the 0's and 1's are placed.
The amount of blocks and the algorithm are really the biggest determining factors.
The amount of blocks and the algorithm are really the biggest determining factors.
Hmm,
So in your Opinion would an Algo switch to say X15 or groestl decrease the memory usage , or would a chain swap be required to see the full benefit of such a switch in Algo.
Hmm I don't know why you would choose x15 to decrease resources, I mean it is using 15 different hashing algos so it would be pretty intensive. Not sure about groestls footprint. I do know that both sha256 and blake are both very light weight. Scrypt not as light weight.
The algorithm really only slows you down when you are either syncing the chain, or checking a block that has just been added to the network. The issue is almost entirely with the size of the chain and the fact that there are several things indexed for each block that are stored in memory.
April 04, 2016, 05:49:19 PM
The coin count itself does not really matter. Each 'coin', or unspent transaction out, has value represented in 64 bits. Whether it is 100 coins or 1 million coins, it will occupy the same 64 bits, the only difference is where the 0's and 1's are placed.
The amount of blocks and the algorithm are really the biggest determining factors.
The amount of blocks and the algorithm are really the biggest determining factors.
Hmm,
So in your Opinion would an Algo switch to say X15 or groestl decrease the memory usage , or would a chain swap be required to see the full benefit of such a switch in Algo.
April 04, 2016, 05:29:59 PM
It would be fantastic if we could take a note from DMD's book and use a bit from their book. POS takes up so little resources on my DMD wallet and the coins are automatically regrouped after staking. Makes for a much easier time loading the client.
Reason Diamond loads faster is it has a smaller blockchain to load into memory.
Same reason new coins load faster smaller blockchains.
Diamond has less than 2 million coins total, Block Speed 100 seconds ,
VS
HBN has over 21 million coins with a Block Speed of 30 seconds
(Which means over 3x faster speed and 3X the ability to carry more transactions than diamond, side effect to that is a larger blockchain which is why it takes up more memory resources) Algo might make some difference HBN scrypt vs Diamond groestl, but probably not enough to worry about.
The coin count itself does not really matter. Each 'coin', or unspent transaction out, has value represented in 64 bits. Whether it is 100 coins or 1 million coins, it will occupy the same 64 bits, the only difference is where the 0's and 1's are placed.
The amount of blocks and the algorithm are really the biggest determining factors.
April 04, 2016, 05:14:45 PM
i needa a hobo bro lol
April 04, 2016, 04:03:58 PM
so still not on yobit
they still resync the blockchain
It took me 3 1/2 days to resync the blockchain. that is absolutely crazy! That is why i don't buy more HBN.they still resync the blockchain
HBN desperately needs some love. YoBit won't make much of a difference without some quality dev care.
Is the Yobit listing going ever to happen?
it has too, i paid for it, blacksmith accepted so it's just a mater of time
but i have no news no reply to my ticket
The guys who paid for TEK to get listed on YoBit had to nag and nag. Check the semi-recent pages of TEK thread for details and excuses etc.
April 04, 2016, 02:36:52 PM
so still not on yobit
they still resync the blockchain
It took me 3 1/2 days to resync the blockchain. that is absolutely crazy! That is why i don't buy more HBN.they still resync the blockchain
HBN desperately needs some love. YoBit won't make much of a difference without some quality dev care.
Is the Yobit listing going ever to happen?
it has too, i paid for it, blacksmith accepted so it's just a mater of time
but i have no news no reply to my ticket
April 04, 2016, 03:42:07 AM
so still not on yobit
they still resync the blockchain
It took me 3 1/2 days to resync the blockchain. that is absolutely crazy! That is why i don't buy more HBN.they still resync the blockchain
HBN desperately needs some love. YoBit won't make much of a difference without some quality dev care.
Is the Yobit listing going ever to happen?
April 01, 2016, 11:01:58 PM
It would be fantastic if we could take a note from DMD's book and use a bit from their book. POS takes up so little resources on my DMD wallet and the coins are automatically regrouped after staking. Makes for a much easier time loading the client.
Reason Diamond loads faster is it has a smaller blockchain to load into memory.
Same reason new coins load faster smaller blockchains.
Diamond has less than 2 million coins total, Block Speed 100 seconds ,
VS
HBN has over 21 million coins with a Block Speed of 30 seconds
(Which means over 3x faster speed and 3X the ability to carry more transactions than diamond, side effect to that is a larger blockchain which is why it takes up more memory resources) Algo might make some difference HBN scrypt vs Diamond groestl, but probably not enough to worry about.
April 01, 2016, 09:09:25 PM
Well, it would be nice if the wallet would use a little less resources for staking. I use a fairly strong laptop to run btc-core, cap and hbn at the same time and it's pretty much all it can handle.
Another thing worth mentioning is the amount of orphans if have staking: About 30% of what is staked turns out to be an orphan.
When I move my wallet to my dab ass i7 desktop, the percentage drops below 5%. Another indication the hbn wallet is very dependent on resources.
All in all, I am very impressed it works so reliably after about 3 years. But if someone would ask, I'd say lighter staking would be a great improvement. The fact that the chain is pretty big doesn't bother me at all. That's easily solved with a bootstrap of which recent ones are always available.
Cheers!
Another thing worth mentioning is the amount of orphans if have staking: About 30% of what is staked turns out to be an orphan.
When I move my wallet to my dab ass i7 desktop, the percentage drops below 5%. Another indication the hbn wallet is very dependent on resources.
All in all, I am very impressed it works so reliably after about 3 years. But if someone would ask, I'd say lighter staking would be a great improvement. The fact that the chain is pretty big doesn't bother me at all. That's easily solved with a bootstrap of which recent ones are always available.
Cheers!
Yes, agree. The wallet is full of useful functions, but is resource hungry. I would guess it is not an easy job to remedy that.
It would be fantastic if we could take a note from DMD's book and use a bit from their book. POS takes up so little resources on my DMD wallet and the coins are automatically regrouped after staking. Makes for a much easier time loading the client.
Yep HBN client is killing me.
April 01, 2016, 08:34:31 PM
Well, it would be nice if the wallet would use a little less resources for staking. I use a fairly strong laptop to run btc-core, cap and hbn at the same time and it's pretty much all it can handle.
Another thing worth mentioning is the amount of orphans if have staking: About 30% of what is staked turns out to be an orphan.
When I move my wallet to my dab ass i7 desktop, the percentage drops below 5%. Another indication the hbn wallet is very dependent on resources.
All in all, I am very impressed it works so reliably after about 3 years. But if someone would ask, I'd say lighter staking would be a great improvement. The fact that the chain is pretty big doesn't bother me at all. That's easily solved with a bootstrap of which recent ones are always available.
Cheers!
Another thing worth mentioning is the amount of orphans if have staking: About 30% of what is staked turns out to be an orphan.
When I move my wallet to my dab ass i7 desktop, the percentage drops below 5%. Another indication the hbn wallet is very dependent on resources.
All in all, I am very impressed it works so reliably after about 3 years. But if someone would ask, I'd say lighter staking would be a great improvement. The fact that the chain is pretty big doesn't bother me at all. That's easily solved with a bootstrap of which recent ones are always available.
Cheers!
Yes, agree. The wallet is full of useful functions, but is resource hungry. I would guess it is not an easy job to remedy that.
It would be fantastic if we could take a note from DMD's book and use a bit from their book. POS takes up so little resources on my DMD wallet and the coins are automatically regrouped after staking. Makes for a much easier time loading the client.
April 01, 2016, 06:46:10 PM
Well, it would be nice if the wallet would use a little less resources for staking. I use a fairly strong laptop to run btc-core, cap and hbn at the same time and it's pretty much all it can handle.
Another thing worth mentioning is the amount of orphans if have staking: About 30% of what is staked turns out to be an orphan.
When I move my wallet to my dab ass i7 desktop, the percentage drops below 5%. Another indication the hbn wallet is very dependent on resources.
All in all, I am very impressed it works so reliably after about 3 years. But if someone would ask, I'd say lighter staking would be a great improvement. The fact that the chain is pretty big doesn't bother me at all. That's easily solved with a bootstrap of which recent ones are always available.
Cheers!
Another thing worth mentioning is the amount of orphans if have staking: About 30% of what is staked turns out to be an orphan.
When I move my wallet to my dab ass i7 desktop, the percentage drops below 5%. Another indication the hbn wallet is very dependent on resources.
All in all, I am very impressed it works so reliably after about 3 years. But if someone would ask, I'd say lighter staking would be a great improvement. The fact that the chain is pretty big doesn't bother me at all. That's easily solved with a bootstrap of which recent ones are always available.
Cheers!
Yes, agree. The wallet is full of useful functions, but is resource hungry. I would guess it is not an easy job to remedy that.
April 01, 2016, 06:43:52 PM
What do you guys think of a re-brand and/or an upgrade to a newer blockchain?
Doubtful,
Nothing wrong with the HBN name, also some exchanges will not support a coin that does a chain swap unless they are paid to setup that coin like a brand new coin.
Plus unless Tranz agrees with you , it is not going to happen.
Chain swaps are nonsensical. A new chain = a different coin.
That is obviously not going to happen.
April 01, 2016, 05:20:01 PM
dam no news from yobit, don't get answer
it s more than 2 weeks and still not online on yobit
it s more than 2 weeks and still not online on yobit
March 31, 2016, 10:37:20 PM
What do you guys think of a re-brand and/or an upgrade to a newer blockchain?
Doubtful,
Nothing wrong with the HBN name, also some exchanges will not support a coin that does a chain swap unless they are paid to setup that coin like a brand new coin.
Plus unless Tranz agrees with you , it is not going to happen.
March 31, 2016, 01:51:38 PM
What do you guys think of a re-brand and/or an upgrade to a newer blockchain?
March 29, 2016, 02:26:05 AM
Well, it would be nice if the wallet would use a little less resources for staking. I use a fairly strong laptop to run btc-core, cap and hbn at the same time and it's pretty much all it can handle.
Another thing worth mentioning is the amount of orphans if have staking: About 30% of what is staked turns out to be an orphan.
When I move my wallet to my dab ass i7 desktop, the percentage drops below 5%. Another indication the hbn wallet is very dependent on resources.
All in all, I am very impressed it works so reliably after about 3 years. But if someone would ask, I'd say lighter staking would be a great improvement. The fact that the chain is pretty big doesn't bother me at all. That's easily solved with a bootstrap of which recent ones are always available.
Cheers!
Another thing worth mentioning is the amount of orphans if have staking: About 30% of what is staked turns out to be an orphan.
When I move my wallet to my dab ass i7 desktop, the percentage drops below 5%. Another indication the hbn wallet is very dependent on resources.
All in all, I am very impressed it works so reliably after about 3 years. But if someone would ask, I'd say lighter staking would be a great improvement. The fact that the chain is pretty big doesn't bother me at all. That's easily solved with a bootstrap of which recent ones are always available.
Cheers!
Jump to: