"Here's to the crazy ones, the HODLERS, the misfits, the rebels, the troublemakers, the round pegs in the square holes... the ones who see the market differently -- they're not fond of ATHs... You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them, but the only thing you can't do is ignore them because they change things... they push BITCOIN forward, and while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius, because the ones who are crazy enough to think that they can HODL forever, are the ones who do"
Steve Jobs
As far as I understand, if you buy an asset, for example BTC, then this asset should bring income. As a result, you need to fix profits. But if you constantly be a holder, then when will it be possible to take profits? It turns out the eternal holder = no profit? Perhaps this rule applies to those who control the market, but even they, I'm sure, periodically fix profits, thereby selling expensively on the market and buying up an asset at certain moments at a low price. For me, eternal hold is not an option, so I always try to take profits so as not to get into a situation where someone takes my invested funds for themselves.