Pages:
Author

Topic: Hong Kong Billionaire Backing Bakkt - page 2. (Read 346 times)

legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1137
January 12, 2019, 02:23:05 AM
#12
i doubt its a good thing if a billionaire is backing something, i dont think it will matter much anymore

I wonder why you said that. Isn't more money will a project to move much faster? I thought this was a good thing.

It is a good thing as long as he holds his position. We need rich holders as we need poor ones. The only danger is he may create an enormous sell pressure if he decides to leave crypto. As long as he believes in crypto there is nothing to worry about.

i think you guys are confusing what the news means.
it is not saying someone (the billionaire) bought bitcoin or any cryptocurrency. it is saying that the person invested "money" in a "company" that is going to offer cryptocurrency related services (Bakkt which will have exchange options). so he didn't buy anything to want to sell it and create any kind of sell pressure on the market.

He can still create sell pressure if he decides to dump his position on bakkt.

Just like bitmain going bakrupt would affect bitcoin and other cryptos, he dumping his position would affect us greatly as well. These stuff are connected.

Money leaving crypto companies > sell pressure on crypto

Sometimes it won't be a direct hit as selling bitcoin right away on an exchange but it would still affect us, maybe slowly but it will.

what you are talking about is "psychological" sell pressure and is more about manipulation of the market not a direct sell pressure as in when a whale actually sells real coins on the market. and they are completely different things.
the "psychological" sell pressure can only be effective if the underlying reason is a big one. for example Bitmain that you mentioned is a big deal because it is the biggest ASIC provider, it owns the biggest mining pools which people also associate with having the biggest hashrate (which is partly wrong),... in short they are completely involved with bitcoin so their demise is going to affect bitcoin a lot. but Bakkt is not even yet started! it doesn't exist and it has no affiliated with bitcoin whatsoever YET. not to mention that this dude is not the only investor, Bakkt already has big names investing in it so that this one dude is lost among them. he is not even the biggest one... Cheesy
jr. member
Activity: 475
Merit: 1
Tackling Climate Change Using Blockchain
January 12, 2019, 01:59:57 AM
#11
this is great news for the bitcoin community, at least it goes to show even though bitcoin is going through a tough phase currently, it is still making waves and penetrating places
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 2442
January 12, 2019, 01:55:28 AM
#10
i doubt its a good thing if a billionaire is backing something, i dont think it will matter much anymore

I wonder why you said that. Isn't more money will a project to move much faster? I thought this was a good thing.

It is a good thing as long as he holds his position. We need rich holders as we need poor ones. The only danger is he may create an enormous sell pressure if he decides to leave crypto. As long as he believes in crypto there is nothing to worry about.

i think you guys are confusing what the news means.
it is not saying someone (the billionaire) bought bitcoin or any cryptocurrency. it is saying that the person invested "money" in a "company" that is going to offer cryptocurrency related services (Bakkt which will have exchange options). so he didn't buy anything to want to sell it and create any kind of sell pressure on the market.

He can still create sell pressure if he decides to dump his position on bakkt.

Just like bitmain going bakrupt would affect bitcoin and other cryptos, he dumping his position would affect us greatly as well. These stuff are connected.

Money leaving crypto companies > sell pressure on crypto

Sometimes it won't be a direct hit as selling bitcoin right away on an exchange but it would still affect us, maybe slowly but it will.

legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1137
January 12, 2019, 01:45:01 AM
#9
i doubt its a good thing if a billionaire is backing something, i dont think it will matter much anymore

I wonder why you said that. Isn't more money will a project to move much faster? I thought this was a good thing.

It is a good thing as long as he holds his position. We need rich holders as we need poor ones. The only danger is he may create an enormous sell pressure if he decides to leave crypto. As long as he believes in crypto there is nothing to worry about.

i think you guys are confusing what the news means.
it is not saying someone (the billionaire) bought bitcoin or any cryptocurrency. it is saying that the person invested "money" in a "company" that is going to offer cryptocurrency related services (Bakkt which will have exchange options). so he didn't buy anything to want to sell it and create any kind of sell pressure on the market.
hero member
Activity: 2842
Merit: 772
January 12, 2019, 01:33:54 AM
#8

i doubt its a good thing if a billionaire is backing something, i dont think it will matter much anymore


I wonder why you said that. Isn't more money will a project to move much faster? I thought this was a good thing.

It is a good thing as long as he holds his position. We need rich holders as we need poor ones. The only danger is he may create an enormous sell pressure if he decides to leave crypto. As long as he believes in crypto there is nothing to worry about.

I believe there will be many other billionaires who is going to back bakkt. He is just the first one. When the others join the party, everything will happen so fast.

They already raised a total of $182.5 million and has partnered with a lot of companies so there's a possibility that even if he dumps we still have something so there's nothing to worry about.

I do hope that many rich people if they hadn't done so, will going to back Bakkt as it is geared towards short and long term goal so let's see how it goes.
jr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 4
January 12, 2019, 01:13:56 AM
#7
Testing peoples patience you say? I don't think bakkt will have huge impact on market price ,even if ETF gets approved it will only bring huge spike in price for short period of time not bullrun
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 2442
January 12, 2019, 01:13:30 AM
#6

i doubt its a good thing if a billionaire is backing something, i dont think it will matter much anymore


I wonder why you said that. Isn't more money will a project to move much faster? I thought this was a good thing.

It is a good thing as long as he holds his position. We need rich holders as we need poor ones. The only danger is he may create an enormous sell pressure if he decides to leave crypto. As long as he believes in crypto there is nothing to worry about.

I believe there will be many other billionaires who is going to back bakkt. He is just the first one. When the others join the party, everything will happen so fast.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1163
Where is my ring of blades...
January 12, 2019, 01:08:40 AM
#5
I wonder why you said that. Isn't more money will a project to move much faster? I thought this was a good thing.

More money != project moves faster. Some ICOs that raised more than $30 millions dollars are yet to have a live product. Sure, money is a good thing to have, but if there is no serious development behind that, then it doesn't mean anything. It's better to have $10 million with continuous development than $50 million where developer focus more on marketing.

are you seriously comparing ICOs with Bakkt?!!!!
ICOs are scam by nature, and most importantly they were never planning to have any product in first place! if you chose to believe their lies, it was your own fault.
Bakkt is a legitimate thing and unlike ICOs it is not created to raise money and run away with it. it is created to offer a service which I believe is very needed in this space.
sr. member
Activity: 910
Merit: 351
January 12, 2019, 01:02:07 AM
#4
I wonder why you said that. Isn't more money will a project to move much faster? I thought this was a good thing.

More money != project moves faster. Some ICOs that raised more than $30 millions dollars are yet to have a live product. Sure, money is a good thing to have, but if there is no serious development behind that, then it doesn't mean anything. It's better to have $10 million with continuous development than $50 million where developer focus more on marketing.
full member
Activity: 756
Merit: 112
January 11, 2019, 07:45:09 PM
#3

i doubt its a good thing if a billionaire is backing something, i dont think it will matter much anymore


I wonder why you said that. Isn't more money will a project to move much faster? I thought this was a good thing.
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
January 11, 2019, 07:23:51 PM
#2
This is huge.  Li Ka-Shing has put money into Bakkt.

I know the recent dump is further testing people's patience, but at least us BTC hodlers are in good company.

https://cryptomenow.com/chinese-billionaire-li-ka-shing-backs-an-upcoming-crypto-exchange/

i doubt its a good thing if a billionaire is backing something, i dont think it will matter much anymore
jr. member
Activity: 42
Merit: 3
January 11, 2019, 06:54:12 PM
#1
This is huge.  Li Ka-Shing has put money into Bakkt.

I know the recent dump is further testing people's patience, but at least us BTC hodlers are in good company.

https://cryptomenow.com/chinese-billionaire-li-ka-shing-backs-an-upcoming-crypto-exchange/
Pages:
Jump to: