The real hurdle is that most stars are liberals. Once they get one whiff of the "liberarian" stuff that gets said around here, they'll not only do a complete 180, many would become advocates against it. Maybe not publicly, but within their circles and that's all it takes. "Hollywood" is not that big.
The Bitcoin diehards are going to have to tone the rhetoric way down, if you seriously want some "star power" on board.
Just my honest opinion.
The Bitcoin diehards are going to have to tone the rhetoric way down, if you seriously want some "star power" on board.
Just my honest opinion.
I wouldn't worry much about "guilt through association". I see you point, but perhaps we should think of the current money system and less about ties with parties to BTC. I feel I am fairly versed in BTC and what it can do, and to be honest, your bringing up the libertarian point here, is the first it has crossed my mind. I have been looking at BTC itself.
I would really hope, considering all that is at stake here, that it won't come down to party affiliation!
Maybe you are right, but I hope not. Anyway, at least you were on point. All these posts now about twisting the title so they can be a millionaire and then spokesperson - ha ha
Come on, the point here guys is that, whether we like it or hate it, public figures can often make or break a cause. Then again there is the Streisand effect.
). At this point the agent has to be on the phone looking rushed and busy trying to organise the situation, our photographers shout "it is XXXX" and rush to start taking photos. At this point no self respecting Paparazzi will walk away, even if they don't know who it is because maybe they might get paid extra when they are back at the pulication office/agency. 
