Average Joe just simply doesn't know enough about bitcoin, he doesn't get the concept, he doesn't understand, the source code is alien, the blockchain is alien too.
Average joe needs more education about btc
Topic: How Average Joe thinks about Bitcoin - page 2. (Read 4554 times)
Average joe needs more education about btc
As usual these are opinions based on pure ignorance, it's like watching people fight over politics, they clearly have no fucking clue what they're on about other than what propaganda feeds them and haven't actually got their own opinions, either that or they've deliberately chosen not to have any.
I don't think it's all hopeless though because I'm having some much more refreshing conversations with friends and family and such about Bitcoin because they're recognising the usual bullshit news organisations say about the currency and they're actually going and looking beyond it because the 'documentaries' and news items are just completely made up insome most cases and they're picking up on it.
I don't think it's all hopeless though because I'm having some much more refreshing conversations with friends and family and such about Bitcoin because they're recognising the usual bullshit news organisations say about the currency and they're actually going and looking beyond it because the 'documentaries' and news items are just completely made up in
It's easy to underestimate just how much time people need to get their head around new paradigms. Even technically-minded people find it hard to get their head around Bitcoin. Imagine how hard it is for Average Joe. This negative reaction in the comments above is natural and unsurprising. It will only evaporate after many, many repeated exposures to the technology.
The cost to buy on most exchanges is .2% as a lower bound. The cost to buy bitcoin on consumer/newbie friendly coinbase is 1%. If you had to pay a $0.05 TX fee on a $0.99 purchase then you would pay ~5% on the TX fee, plus 1% on the purchase of bitcoin for a total of 6%.
If you had to pay a $0.05 TX fee on a $0.99 purchase then you would pay ~5% on the TX fee, plus 1% on the purchase of bitcoin for a total of 6%Now if you were to do the same transaction with a credit card then the merchant would likely pay $0.29 as a flat fee for processing the credit card transaction plus 3% based on the dollar amount. This would add up to roughly 33%. Granted, you do not pay for this, the merchant does, however this is ultimately reflected on the merchant's prices. Even worse, there are some merchants that would choose to decline your business if you are paying with a credit card for a $0.99 transaction, so you would end up paying nothing for the transaction, but would be thirsty.
Why would I used a credit card for a such transaction ? I might as well used cash (like a usually did) and incur no additional fees at all.
BTW, the price canned drink is around here is about 0.40 USD(give or take a few cent), so it really is 10% more expensive(not counting the cost of obtaining the bitcoin). To put into perspective , the price of a single Bitcoin at its lowest this year was still higher than the minimum wage(which is around 300USD).
Even if that person is interested in bitcoin doesn't mean s/he will adopt bitcoin .Frankly, bitcoin is worthless to me right now .It solves absolutely no problem for me and the thing that it does really well( money tranfer ) actually cost more than the mainstream that it's trying to replace.So no, I don't see myself using bitcoin and I consider myself more knowledgeable about bitcoin that the average joe.
I think you are misinformed as to the cost of sending a transaction. You can usually send a TX for free under the right circumstances, or if the TX is over a certain size then it will generally cost you ~$0.05 (.0001 BTC). As it stands, the cost of obtaining the coin itself and converting it back to fiat basically killed any savings( and add more cost) it would give if I use it as money remittance tool, and that is before I factored in the TX fee.
The TX fee also is a problem if you want to use it for very small transaction here.Say I want to buy one canned non alcoholic beverage(doest matter if it's carbonated or not) ,I would be paying 10%( after converting to local currency) more due to the TX alone! Not that any vendors here accept cryptos in the first place.
Now if you were to do the same transaction with a credit card then the merchant would likely pay $0.29 as a flat fee for processing the credit card transaction plus 3% based on the dollar amount. This would add up to roughly 33%. Granted, you do not pay for this, the merchant does, however this is ultimately reflected on the merchant's prices. Even worse, there are some merchants that would choose to decline your business if you are paying with a credit card for a $0.99 transaction, so you would end up paying nothing for the transaction, but would be thirsty.
Even if that person is interested in bitcoin doesn't mean s/he will adopt bitcoin .Frankly, bitcoin is worthless to me right now .It solves absolutely no problem for me and the thing that it does really well( money tranfer ) actually cost more than the mainstream that it's trying to replace.So no, I don't see myself using bitcoin and I consider myself more knowledgeable about bitcoin that the average joe.
I think you are misinformed as to the cost of sending a transaction. You can usually send a TX for free under the right circumstances, or if the TX is over a certain size then it will generally cost you ~$0.05 (.0001 BTC). As it stands, the cost of obtaining the coin itself and converting it back to fiat basically killed any savings( and add more cost) it would give if I use it as money remittance tool, and that is before I factored in the TX fee.
The TX fee also is a problem if you want to use it for very small transaction here.Say I want to buy one canned non alcoholic beverage(doest matter if it's carbonated or not) ,I would be paying 10%( after converting to local currency) more due to the TX alone! Not that any vendors here accept cryptos in the first place.
The comments at the bottom of this article are hilarious.
Many of them seem to echo this sentiment:
"Bitcoin started by an unknown in 2009 and people are buying into it. I think there is going to be a lot people either very broke or very disappointed in the end. Someone is making money here and it probably isn't the average Joe."
Misinformed? Clearly.
Knee-jerk reaction? Definitely.
Should be dismissed? I'm not sure.
Satoshi even agrees with this idea. I believe he said something along the lines that in 30 years there will either be a huge number of bitcoin transactions or barely any at all.
I like this because it shows we (people in this forum learning about Bitcoin) will still be considered pioneers. Once people GET IT, the price will be fucking ridiculous and we are lucky to be here already.
Average Joe just simply doesn't know enough about bitcoin, he doesn't get the concept, he doesn't understand, the source code is alien, the blockchain is alien too.
Lets see in ten years what the average joe will think about bitcoin.
well informed and wise people.
Who really cares what the Average Joe thinks right now? It doesn't matter what they think of it, today, tomorrow or months from now. What matters is what they think of it in the near future. I'm sure the Avergae Joe wasn't impressed by the internet when they forst heard of it. I'd rather it have a slow growth as well. Gives me more time to get more bitcoins before the public catch on.
The comments at the bottom of this article are hilarious.
Many of them seem to echo this sentiment:
"Bitcoin started by an unknown in 2009 and people are buying into it. I think there is going to be a lot people either very broke or very disappointed in the end. Someone is making money here and it probably isn't the average Joe."
Misinformed? Clearly.
Knee-jerk reaction? Definitely.
Should be dismissed? I'm not sure.
Well, when you start making money off of it as a financial investment alone, you stop being an average Joe. The main question is whether the coins are consolidating in fewer hands, and I think the trend is in the opposite direction. The goal is not to eliminate the rich, but to decrease the barriers of entry for everyone. We need enough players with diverse interests to remove the risk of monopolistic behavior, but that's about it.
Even if that person is interested in bitcoin doesn't mean s/he will adopt bitcoin .Frankly, bitcoin is worthless to me right now .It solves absolutely no problem for me and the thing that it does really well( money tranfer ) actually cost more than the mainstream that it's trying to replace.So no, I don't see myself using bitcoin and I consider myself more knowledgeable about bitcoin that the average joe.
I think you are misinformed as to the cost of sending a transaction. You can usually send a TX for free under the right circumstances, or if the TX is over a certain size then it will generally cost you ~$0.05 (.0001 BTC). It is a misconception by some people in the public that the block subsidies are something that people that send TXs need to pay for. It is something that is known will happen by the public and the price is adjusted accordingly.
The comments at the bottom of this article are hilarious.
Many of them seem to echo this sentiment:
"Bitcoin started by an unknown in 2009 and people are buying into it. I think there is going to be a lot people either very broke or very disappointed in the end. Someone is making money here and it probably isn't the average Joe."
Misinformed? Clearly.
Knee-jerk reaction? Definitely.
Should be dismissed? I'm not sure.
The comments at the bottom of this article are hilarious.
I think the mindset of people should be changed regarding bitcoins. I have seen many cases when people seem interested in bitcoins but don't like hassle going through all exchanges. They prefer money processors like Paypal.
Short-sightedness at its finest.
Let me spell it out for you .Bitcoin is currently useless to me , thus it is worthless to me, which lead to me not going going to use it.The moment that change I'll reassess my position.
Sounds pretty pragmatic to me.
Bitcoin is not even a static, finished product. It's an ever evolving open software.
No shit ,Sherlock!!
LOLPerchance you be better of telling this to someone who isn't aware of this.
That sucks how average person thinks about bitcoin. I think cryptos should be introduced to school as age of 12..
old people are always trying to say you cant do this and you cant do that. people for the most part dont like change and dont embrace it.
some people readily like risk and challenges and problems and jump head first into anything that piques there interest. average people dont do this, it will be more years before we get average people to use it.
for now mostly the people using it are not average by any measure. it took paypal awhile to get regular people into using it as it takes awhile to show benefits of something. paypal for awhile wasn't used by normal people but when ebay integrated it in and bought them out now tons of normal ppl use it.
some people readily like risk and challenges and problems and jump head first into anything that piques there interest. average people dont do this, it will be more years before we get average people to use it.
for now mostly the people using it are not average by any measure. it took paypal awhile to get regular people into using it as it takes awhile to show benefits of something. paypal for awhile wasn't used by normal people but when ebay integrated it in and bought them out now tons of normal ppl use it.
Jump to: