This is the way blockchain analytics operate. These companies make probable statistics and predictions and a 1 year old address with no outputs is going to be put in a group they suspect to be lost.
Sorry, but this is a nonsense metric. Even addresses which are dormant for 5-10 years cannot be assumed to be lost, but only 1 year? Given that the general knowledge regarding importance of back ups and seed phrases is continually increasing, and given we know that more and more people are holding for the long term, then the vast majority of coins which have not moved in one year are simply being held.
I was responding to this post and somehow I did a typo with 1 instead of 10.
Here's what I wrote about it earlier.
/snip/
We don't know how much of the supply is in this state of limbo, but coins that weren't moved for the last 10 years will most likely be put in this group.
I agree that we cannot be sure which wallets are lost and which are not, but the statistics are made anyway. We could use the example of that guy in the UK who lost his hard drive. The coins are like that Schrodinger's Cat, which is dead and isn't at the same time. They are probably lost forever, but there's a small chance that someone will one day find that hard drive.
You guys say that old wallets sometimes wake up, of course they do. People pronounced dead sometimes come back to life, but how often does it happen? Does it happen often enough for us to consider 10 year old wallets as active? How many of these wallets will eventually wake up? 1% maybe? 2%?