If the developers team telling the truth, they afraid people will not join in their ICOs. Most ICOs investor are speculator and not a long term holder. Maybe if the team telling the truth, investor will not attracting to their project anymore because the project need time
It is indeed true is, it is referred to as tricks in marketing to attract investors come in and support them. so when there are a number of aspects which was deliberately covered up or manipulated then this thing is natural. an annoying is if this wastage and finally culminate in a scam. but when all the ICO really want to open in General will be able to give birth to many ICO quality and without the correct manipulation because the best will survive. 
Topic: How dangerous is it to write the truth? (Read 427 times)
I think if we knew about projects, it would be great because we could make the right decisions.
If the developers team telling the truth, they afraid people will not join in their ICOs. Most ICOs investor are speculator and not a long term holder. Maybe if the team telling the truth, investor will not attracting to their project anymore because the project need time
Paid reviews, hiding truth is not uncommon but it happens everywhere.There are a lot of situations that people does not give you the full truth.When you are buying a car, when you are buying a house, investing in shares.One way or other there is the truth about it.You just have to keep looking till you are sure.They can pay for good reviews but there is someone who tells the truth.Just like amazon user reviews.That guy who is angry is the one you should read.
The market works in a funny way. Paid ratings and reviews are widely accepted and do not hurt anyone but the naive investors. They are often written by the projects themselves to make them look good. After all, that is the purpose of marketing and promotion.
What would happen if you were to bring out the truth and say it like it is? How dangerous is it?
It the truth befits investors and destroys the projects, would that cause a balance?
This example of an ICO report shows the truthful facts which go beyond official documentation.
https://crypto-potential.com/report/1
How would you feel about this as an Investor and as an ICO that was just evaluated?
What would happen if you were to bring out the truth and say it like it is? How dangerous is it?
It the truth befits investors and destroys the projects, would that cause a balance?
This example of an ICO report shows the truthful facts which go beyond official documentation.
https://crypto-potential.com/report/1
How would you feel about this as an Investor and as an ICO that was just evaluated?
Well I guess that is true, but when they are paying the ICO benchmarks, so many investors and bounty hunters do really invest in their money, effort, and time. As a result, the project may succeed and reach their hardcap. Their fund somehow makes them a good project and extend their capability to implement. As you know, money can do anything.
The market works in a funny way. Paid ratings and reviews are widely accepted and do not hurt anyone but the naive investors. They are often written by the projects themselves to make them look good. After all, that is the purpose of marketing and promotion.
What would happen if you were to bring out the truth and say it like it is? How dangerous is it?
It the truth befits investors and destroys the projects, would that cause a balance?
This example of an ICO report shows the truthful facts which go beyond official documentation.
https://crypto-potential.com/report/1
How would you feel about this as an Investor and as an ICO that was just evaluated?
What would happen if you were to bring out the truth and say it like it is? How dangerous is it?
It the truth befits investors and destroys the projects, would that cause a balance?
This example of an ICO report shows the truthful facts which go beyond official documentation.
https://crypto-potential.com/report/1
How would you feel about this as an Investor and as an ICO that was just evaluated?
If something is not going to work or that it is not what it is said to be, standing one's ground to debunk such lie and say the truth is never a bad thing. In fact, one is offering more help than harm. I would even say that no harm has been done, because in a way you are saving a life that perhaps could have been in jeopardy. You might not know the impact and usefulness of what you have done, until you find yourself in such situation.
Most cryptos are not serious on their whitepaper they just relying on the price of bitcoin and other cryptos which will determine on how many users they have. I think they should offer blockchain services or scientists to come up on their existing projects and to show to the world how capable their coins will work.
People don't like to hear the truth, but they won't avenge it. It all depends on who it is aimed at. If it is ordinary people - not scary.
indeed, not all ICO websites review correctly, so if we look at the project, it is better not to finish with the ICO website review. dig deeper information with your own method which if you think is right and cannot doubt its success
What if there was already someone who can help you dig deeper?
indeed, not all ICO websites review correctly, so if we look at the project, it is better not to finish with the ICO website review. dig deeper information with your own method which if you think is right and cannot doubt its success
Telling the truth might be dangerous sometimes but trust me it only way to make things right. But the issue here in crypto is that most projects never talked about the truth which latter turns out to be bad and i don't blame them it because people are also not ready for that, the real one won't look promising to us we just need the truth in crypto.
The truth will surely prevail one day , I also wonder how sweet it was when bounty hunters promote project that is yet to show it true colour or what it real has to offer like a real gem, and talk like the project is just like heaven that need not to be told but such project also end up scamming the bounty Hunter themselves, and with the rate in which this happen many feel non concern and the technology is becoming something else and not a decentralized technology as we preach anymore.
It is quite difficult to find a website that review an ICO with the truthful facts. I think investors will be interested to join if there is a potential profits in the ICO project. So, don't worry to tell the truth, but you also need to provide a potential and quality ICO for the main reason to make investors joining.
As far as i know, internet world is a free world, so anybody can tell the truths about the projects they are reviewing but most of them paid reviewers so we won't see many reviews like that because they are earning their money from there.
I would have to agree with OP wherein ICO should not fake what is the truth and don't let people being hooked on an ICO which is actually not performing well just to get the attention of the investors to put on their investment. In my views, it would be better to make your own research in searching for an ICO in which you should not rely particularly on that ICO that are making false information.
It is not always necessary to tell the truth about the project. Some information is best left secret. But this does not always mean that the project is fraudulent. The project team can resort to various measures, like of buy rating etc, for the good of the project.
Projects can keep the secret and not paint the whole picture about themselves. This is expected.
But what about review websites who evaluate projects, just like I added the link in the opening post? Shows the other side of the project that most people don't see and it's hardcore truth.
It is not always necessary to tell the truth about the project. Some information is best left secret. But this does not always mean that the project is fraudulent. The project team can resort to various measures, like of buy rating etc, for the good of the project.
this is not new news for me, now it is very often the ICO project, in order to attract interested people to be interested in their ICO projects. it is a very fraudulent marketing method in my opinion, because they use something that can ultimately harm others.
It is quite difficult to find a website that review an ICO with the truthful facts. I think investors will be interested to join if there is a potential profits in the ICO project. So, don't worry to tell the truth, but you also need to provide a potential and quality ICO for the main reason to make investors joining.
It has long been no news that developers pay money for a good assessment of their ICO. There are a huge number of such examples. It seems to me that nobody pays attention to the ICO rating for a long time.
I would support such a website that would make real reviews for new projects and was incorruptible. Maybe even would I like to be in a team of people who would rate ICO. If you will need people in your team than PM to me)
Thanks for the support. I've just PM'd you.
Jump to: