They aren't trustworthy at all.
Currently, it is just a random wallet.
Define random.
Define trustworthy.
How can you be sure that they actually know how to code software properly ?
I don't. But IMO, this doesn't make them COMPLETLY untrustworthy.
You can't check what the wallet is doing. You have to blindly trust the developer.
Fact. That's why I compared it to Exodus (you also have to blindly trust Exodus' dev). Again, this doesn't necessarily mean that they can't be trusted. There is more in trust than "seeing"; we don't (personally) know nor can read the mind of many people here, but we sometimes trust them (even if it's in parts).
How are the binaries uploaded ? Who has access to the github ?
You can't even be sure that a new version is truly being uploaded by the original developer instead of someone who gained access to their github.
TBF, that's the case with any other GitHub repo. You can actually upload whatever you want to your GitHub repo binaries (even if it's different than the source code on the repo). How are they uploaded and who has access to it?
Their main purpose might not be to scam people, but as mentioned.. Access to github, intentions turning into bad ones, code quality.. all factors which you can't control.
With open source, you'd be able to check what the software does. Find backdoors in new updates, etc..
Closed source? No chance.
Just like Coinbase, Blockchain.info, Xapo, etc... again, doesn't necessarily mean that you can't trust them. You can't BLINDLY trust them nor be sure about what they are doing. And yes, there are way better and more safe options. But, you can have your own convinction.
In short, all I said was my own opinion.
I don't think they are a scam and that's it.
