Topic: How do we destroy ISIS an co? - page 2. (Read 2662 times)

actually i dont care about them
let the time to answer all of the
just believed they will receive karma

A great account of someone who's been in ISIS territory not long ago, and I don't think he went there because of it, just for traveling purposes.

http://waitbutwhy.com/2014/09/muhammad-isis-iraqs-full-story.html

[Awesome blog by the way ]

We are all on a bus with careering towards a cliff with three people fighting over the wheel. The one thinks they have the divine right to drive the bus, the other is suicidal and the third doesn't know how to drive the bus. What do you do?

Get off the BUS

It doesn't have to be spoken loudly, for instance on tv shows that's impiled a lot.
Especially "Person Of Interest". If you watch it then you would know the machine gives a (social security) number who's unknown a victim or perpetrator yet. If this number is a muslim, John Reese says "terorist cell" immediately.

This is not the only one example, tv show 24 was also another example on that; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_reaction_to_24#Depiction_of_Muslims

Here in the US I don't see anything remotely like "arabs/muslims are all terrorists." 

What I do see that is annoying is too much news time to the latest little attention seeking atrocity of the extremists (this year, ISIS)

The best way is to stop paying income taxes in America. This can easily be done by following the directions here:

Well, Obviously you can't.

After WWI when the "Westerners" split "Sick Man" (a.k.a Ottoman Empire) they created this shithole in Middle East.
First Britain turned arabs against Turks, and they betrayed us. Then the winner side of war shared middle east soil because of oil.
When Britain's, USA's etc wealth decreased; they created shit excuses to attack Middle East countries to gain more oil, money etc.

And now, arabs are fighting back to those colonizers but western media says arabs/muslims are all terorists.

ps: I'm not defending ISIS, obviously ISIS is terorist. When I said arabs I meant real owner of the middle east soil.

Oh, they could be anihilated relatively easily in very short time. There hasn't been interest in doing so by any country with the power to do it: china, russia usa or even possibly israel. In fact it was the US that created conditions for it to spring to life.
Hussein, kadaffi, Assad, they went and attacked/killed these and portrait them as incarnations of the devil. That is very stupid, those leaders were perfect for those countries. Look what hellholes they became after these leaders were removed from their chairs.
People critized sadam hussein and called him a murder, but what exactly is the right way to deal with the kind of people that makes up the ISIS as of today? Did he do so wrong? Would he get them under control with silly soft legislation like in western nations?

With less colateral damage than that already caused in iraq and afganistan in the last 15 years, it would be pretty straight forward to remove the isis of the map. But there is simply no country or political force with any motivation to do it.

That asside, I see a rather steady, and now rapid, exodus from the western delusional mindset of universal peace and silly assumptions that every third world person is a saint. Parties with more radical optinions both on the left and on the right will have their chance to try out different paradigms. EU might be dismantled because of this, many social assumptions such as tax paying, national defence, open borders, will be questioned and or eventually cease to exist. So I think the ISIS is having tremendous impact in the world, in the sense that they are opening people's eyes for the fact that assholes like them do exist and and more concentrated in some parts of the world and some specific ethnicities. This is a fact. Although I think that as soon as they try to set foot on any minimally functional country they will be stoped like a cockroach. The most direct candidates are of course turkey and iran, but even egypt could easily beat them

Wouldn't the next guy in charge just pop up? its seems like cutting funding while bombing them would workout the best but I don't see how you could be able to successfully stop them from receiving funds.

Many of their current leaders are former military men so they have expertise in these attacks and town takeovers. If they are all killed, it maybe more difficult to coordinate strategies.

If funding would be cut, they wouldn't be able to buy weapons/ammo and it would be hard for them to advance.

All they want is your hatred. The idea of terrorism is to foment hatred and provoke a stupid overreaction. It's hard to argue that terrorism has not been successful in that effort. 9/11 did not break the world, our reaction to it has. Success draws support and we are now seeing that support growing. I don't know what we can do?

Eliminating the current leader could lead to an internal power struggle, however IS seems to have a relative loose mission oriented comman structure. Cutting off their funding is an interesting problem. Their supporters needs to be eliminated first but doing that could be an issue...

Destroy it's creator (US) and see what happens.

That is a lot of doh, and that is just threw their oil exports. Then they have the banks museums they have taken over everywhere they go, they take full control of the place which is scarey really isint it.. Also i have to ask do they sell the oil in dollars to the west? I have seen they do if that is the case no wonder US/UK are leaving them to it which = they are just as bad and guilty but we already know thins anyway 

I believe ISIS are just another incarnation of the Mujahadeen.. These bastards have been warring and being dicks for like 3000 years.. Nothing is going to change that short of nuclear bombing the whole damn middle east.

I beleive that they are dreadful people, possibly the sickest vilest human beings of recent years, I don't really think that the media is lying to us, I think they might be over-blowing the risk the pose to the west, but otherwise the reporting is fair enough.  My question would be though, why should we (the west) do anything?  We aren't the world's policeman.  The local countries of the region should probably intervene when neccessay, but I don't see it as a job for the west.

Yeah, the first thing would be to cut off their funding. It's mind-boggling that they profit almost $3 Million daily from their oil exports.

Need to stop the flow of new recruits and funding first. Then start getting rid of them piece by piece.

Once they they have no money or leadership, they will crumble.

I notice a thread derail here, wonder why?

Dude you cannot tell me what happened i am well versed in the known and unknown history of the wars plus recent times.

Thanks for the link i will not click though...