99% of all ICOs are money-losing businesses. The times are over when you could make easily money out of almost every ICO.
Just do some research and compare the buying price of recent ICOs with the current value and many have less than have the value.
Topic: how do you choose ICO ? - page 2. (Read 269 times)
Number one I look is the campaign manager itself, since we have friends in here that make the list of good bounty manager then I compare them so sometimes you can across with a names in both post so I go with it since they also tell the style of the manager and its previous work, then I check the project white paper, its roadmap, token supply and distribution.
Easy way to choose good bounty is to check the top rating of ICO list in some sites like ICOdrops, ICObench, Coingecko etc. Otherwise you have to analyze the project, keep track on manager, follow social activities, check whitepaper etc.
Just take some advices from the experiences players . What are their views and go thourgh the ICO's whitepaper thoroughly so that you
will get good knowledge of that ICO and also take go through the team of that ICO as its whole market is dependent on that team.
will get good knowledge of that ICO and also take go through the team of that ICO as its whole market is dependent on that team.
There are rules on which people are assessed ico?
But you can not be completely sure that this is exactly what happens. Team and road map, advisers, white paper, they are all good, there are prospects. But then they just pissed off all the people. From such it is impossible to insure. So, how to properly evaluate ico?
I have a lot sources for ICO's and I choose based on reading the whitepaper, I do not have a lot of technical knowledge, but I try to understand the problem and solution the project is proffering. I check the team and reviews about the project by respected people in the industry.
It is researc, you need to scan the space for good projects, most people recently only go to ico-listing website and youtube videos which is good but looking at the way the space has changed, you need to get into project early, like private sale and presale
There are a lot of factors that go into researching a valuable ICO. IMO you should be looking at the goal that they are trying to accomplish, the problem they are trying to solve, the steps they are taking and willing to take to solve the given problem, what kind of funds they're trying to raise for their project.
Example...if a startup project is trying to raise 400 million, you have to ask yourself, why on earth do they need that much money?
Take a look at a couple of projects, I think you'll find them interesting. Fr8 Network and/or Muirfield IP.
Fr8 is trying to remove intermediaries from the supply chain process, bringing revenue back to distributors and carriers.
Muirfield IP is a private equity fund based on the blockchain.
Still, DYOR.
Example...if a startup project is trying to raise 400 million, you have to ask yourself, why on earth do they need that much money?
Take a look at a couple of projects, I think you'll find them interesting. Fr8 Network and/or Muirfield IP.
Fr8 is trying to remove intermediaries from the supply chain process, bringing revenue back to distributors and carriers.
Muirfield IP is a private equity fund based on the blockchain.
Still, DYOR.
Everyone should have their own strategy in this regard. I first of all read the white paper and look at the team. After that I draw conclusions, it is necessary to me further to understand the project or not
There are rules on which people are assessed ico?
But you can not be completely sure that this is exactly what happens. Team and road map, advisers, white paper, they are all good, there are prospects. But then they just pissed off all the people. From such it is impossible to insure. So, how to properly evaluate ico?
You can never 100% avoid risks in investing. Scammers have always been and will be especially in the ICOs, because at the moment there is no full-fledged regulatory legislation.
I suggest you to review ICO first. You can check ICO on reviewing site. On Icobench my first see is activity of ICO on Bitcointlk, social media, etc. Check telegram channel to. more member on telegram, is more chance success. Why activity is important ( in my opinion ), its because ICO is need investor to reach success for his project. So, more activity is more chance to get investor. Investing.com is good option to review ICO. On investing.com is not crypto only and have a big investing community . So, if ICO is listing on investing.com, i think that ICO have a chance to success.
Good Luck.
*Sorry my Bad English
Good Luck.
*Sorry my Bad English
first I see the rate iconya, whitepaper, website and also threadnya
and the most important thing is to know the team of the ico project
and the most important thing is to know the team of the ico project
I kind of go into IcoBench and check the hot ICOs then go on a deeper research about those. There's a lot to check but it's better if you make your own judgement based on the information you gathered so you can do better over time.
All that you listed is still what almost everybody posting here will tell you. Kind of you knew the answers already. Let me add, buying into ICO is like crossing the rail tracks with eyes closed. It is a very big risk. Even those with great team and white paper still end up fraudulent.
There are rules on which people are assessed ico?
But you can not be completely sure that this is exactly what happens. Team and road map, advisers, white paper, they are all good, there are prospects. But then they just pissed off all the people. From such it is impossible to insure. So, how to properly evaluate ico?
Jump to: