Topic: How do you choose your bounty hunt? - page 3. (Read 515 times)
For my investigation first i go on to the website of icobench and see what the highest rating ICO to be joined in bounty and see their whitepaper and projects all about
The first is the total bounty money and the campaign type.
The referral campaign is not suitable for me that is why I usually choose the signature campaign.
The referral campaign is not suitable for me that is why I usually choose the signature campaign.
For me i did research and check the projects if its marketable and good to join bounty in order for my time is not useless.i ask to my friends suggestions.Another idea is to know the developers and advisor behind the project and of course th quality.
How do i choose your bounty hunt? I choose bounty by others opions, research about the bounty, is it trusted.. Like that. Well others recoomend me to other bounty. Good bounty good outcome. Trust the bounty
I use the group in telegram. There they distributed links to various companies and companies. Immediately I placed the rating of the company and told about the opportunities. Very comfortably.
you found a link to a particular company, or is there a group that reviews several companies in your chat room? it would be good to learn and share such information. 
Personnally I just do a lot of research about the project I am interrested in since joinning a bounty campaign is like investing in ICO so you have to carefully pick your project because you will be locked in one bounty for 1 month to 4 month or more depending on project. Also you need to check the bounty manager background and see if he is legit or not since a lot of bounty manager are ignoring bounty participants messages and give wrong stakes.
Most important thing is how well I think the project of the bounty will do. Generally, most bounties pay around the same range. The difference is in how well the coin does after the ICO. For example, I did electroneum's bounty and the coin immediately jumped 8x after it was listed. It was my most profitable bounty so far.
I use the group in telegram. There they distributed links to various companies and companies. Immediately I placed the rating of the company and told about the opportunities. Very comfortably.
First i saw background team developer, supply coin, soft cap and hard cap, crowdsale price, Whitepaper and then road map. If ICO have a good future then they must have good team, and active promotions in social media or blog to got more investor .
I would choose a good bounty manager, because I don't want my hard earned money to be ignored and choose a more popular and more hot ICO project, so they will pay the bounty.
Same way I choose to invest in different projects, since it's my time that I put into it. Team, experience, potential prototype, whitepaper. Factoring all these in, I try to choose the most solid option. Not the amount paid right after the campaign ends, given that a good project can easily jump some time after the ICO. Also, I tend to favor those that use platforms to track your submitted work. It's more professional, I guess.
Whatever is written in whitepaper, if it a scam or fraud it will always be fraud if the manager or project aimed to it. They will always copy do better or be the same as legit one. Thats the challenge we have identify to punish them. Let us be vigilant in choosing campaigns. If only there's such a way to prevent these frauds. However, talking to the managers and searching thoroughly in the project wil minimize catching one. If you are going to choose campaigns, i suggest the greater reward the better. They all will start from scratch. And eventually start to increase as time goes by.
The only thing I would consider on looking for a good signature bounty campaign is the bounty campaign manager.
Good bounty campaign manager especially higher ranked managers like Hero or Legendary Members are veteran on this field and they have so many followers too.
That's why most of their ICOs were successful because because bounty hunter are will to promote their ICO signature through actively participating on different discussions and interesting forums.
Yahoo, Sylon, Needmoney, Arteezy, Thehun are my favorites and I never join any signature bounty campaign if they're not the bounty campaign manager.
Good bounty campaign manager especially higher ranked managers like Hero or Legendary Members are veteran on this field and they have so many followers too.
That's why most of their ICOs were successful because because bounty hunter are will to promote their ICO signature through actively participating on different discussions and interesting forums.
Yahoo, Sylon, Needmoney, Arteezy, Thehun are my favorites and I never join any signature bounty campaign if they're not the bounty campaign manager.
Do you follow any particular system or do you take any particular steps to make sure you are on a good bounty campaign? Do you just look at the WP or the total ammount?
I choose the most number of credible participants in a bounty campaign which include high rangking campaign managers and bounty hunters themselves since they know how to do their thing and have much knowledge regarding this campaigns. I utilize this to somehow give me a hint whether it is a good bounty or not.
I have several criteria for choose bounty compaings. The first i look is the bounty pool worth to take part in compaign. The secon i look road map and think is the project will useful for crypto industry. And the third factor i look is the bounty manager have a good reputation.
They are a few things i watch. First of all, how the project. Is it something i believe it will run good? After that how much is the bounty stake? I dont participate when i have to do 30post per week and can just earn end of the bounty tokens who are worth 20$. And i also watch how many people participate on the bounty. Its useless to participate when the bounty stake are 100'000tokens and they are already 1000 people in and a token is on the token sale 1cent. So it has to be profitable for me.
Most often you have to rely on intuition 
at the end all the analysis factors still do not give even minimal guarantees.
at the end all the analysis factors still do not give even minimal guarantees.
I try to alternate the methods of selection and look at how the results change. Now I try to determine the quality of the bounty on the manager
The main step when I search a new bounty is to get through dozens projects listed at different ICO trackers. The first thing where I look at is expert ratings and the community support - it's pretty easy to determine them. The next thing is the bounty reward and the spreadsheet. I make my own spreadsheet with projects which fit some conditions about rewards, ratings and the size of community. This step significantly reduces the amount of existed options. After that I analyse WP and project details to determine the winner.
Interesting, I haven't participated any bounty programs yet. Will take the advice to be an bounty hunter.
Jump to: