So I set up a telegram group to share good projects with everyone, not to waste time participating in junk content.
How do you determine which project is good and which one is bad? What is your yardstick of judgement? Also it is more of a subjective approach and not an objective one - something that is lacking among all PR systems in the crypto ecosystem except some few.
In fact, I don't think that judging the project depends on the number of people involved and the publicity of the project itself, but the real discussion and communication of the project.
No. A project that is having discussion may be using ICO thread bumping services to develop a fake buzz and keeping their thread on top or their group active. It would be a shady approach.
Communication is another blanket there. A company may have good communication but that does not mean development is actually occurring unless they show their MVP for testing and use. Someone can just run a project with delaying development like most corporate do and keep investors in the dark. Another shady approach.