If one entity needs to get currency to another entity they will be able to do so. The way that I am seeing it, it doesn't matter where the money comes from as long as they are getting the money in the first place. In fact, wouldn't Bitcoin make this type of funding more difficult to detect?
Then again, maybe I am looking at this the wrong way.
Could someone help shed some light on this narrative?
But to its contrary basis many crits and government have claimed btc usage on dark web to fund illicit activities because it's decentralisation nature like dealing in arms and drugs etc.You don't have to go through any third party settlement of funds which provides you freedom of funds but not transparency as each and every transaction prompted from any wallet is stored on public ledger blockchain and you can find address details from that.
Bitcoin was created with aim to be used as deflationary payment system by Sathoshi and to provide your freedom from Central banks and fiat to some extent but not to counter any crimes.
Suppose any funds are transferred to some another wallet you can't take any serious action because daily thousands of Bitcoin are moved on the network by whales and investors.Moreover they prefer to make fiat transaction for such crimes as well so we can't say btc or any other currencies would help in this manner unless government themselves took a step to end geographical and political wars among themselves.