Topic: How Does Dash Crypto-Currency Solve Many of Bitcoin's Problems? - page 2. (Read 1821 times)

It's just not logical Captain.

Maybe the bloat is differed somehow, or blockchain truncating is going on?

I'm betting the network will be running at full capacity all the time regardless of transaction volume and that there will be no blockchain bloat!

I agree...I understand the concept behind the confirmationless wallet. It's merely powered by InstantX (presumably).

Instant Darksend without bloat is the one I have a had time wrapping my head around. I can't wait to find out how he is going to do it.

The thing is ^^^ I thought Dash had it all already.  And I can see IX being used for every transaction, that's cool.  DS, anonymity mixing, I can't see that being done for everyone all the time without bloating the chain.  But Evan says he solved that??? Wha???  But if Evan said he solved it... he solved it.

The quorums doing all the work, locking transaction, all IX, OK, I get that.

Sounds like just a natural progression to what's already there, just better.  Can the DAPI actually give us other functionality that I am not thinking of?  Maybe making Merchant services easier?  There is a lot of hoopla here, is it really new Evan Duffield magic or expansion on what we already have (good, but not magic)?  If it's just expanding the system, why the secrecy.

I'm thinking there is more to this...?

We should have a competition to see if we can figure out what Evolution is all about.  I'm frustrated that after waiting forever for Bitcoin Wednesday to publish a video, most of the plans are still



URG! Hope we get all of it in January, not just part!  LOL

But I'm a team player and I agree with holding cards close to the vest as long as possible.

I've read about the spork concept...it enables rapid development by allowing new changes in the code to be "turned off" if there is a failure, which means that hard forks are no longer necessary.

InstantX has proven to be so secure, Evan is going to make it so that all transactions are processed through IX using Quorums.  Since Quorums are chosen randomly with the mining hash, and only, 5 or 10 are needed, it seems, with over 3000 masternodes, we could have 300-600 quorums running at a time.  They don't take but, what? 300 milliseconds to process a transaction, ... anyway that's how Evan came up with the guesstimated .... oh heck, where is that chart?  I can't find the Bitcoin Wednesday thingy!  LOL.  Well, it was over 1700 transactions per second wasn't it?

Still, didn't Evan say the blockchain wouldn't bloat?  How can that be?  He did tell me when I asked the direct question, that you will be able to trace all transactions to the creation of each coin, so nothing will be hidden, just the users will remain obscured.  So did he say there would be no bloat or that bloat won't be a problem?  There is a big difference.  It's so easy to get misinformation on these forums!  But I don't want to bother Evan with another question

BTW, I hope you're going to moderate this thread so we can actually talk somewhere!

Also, you didn't include the "Distributed Application Programming Interface" DAPI on the list.  I think that one thing is important for making wallets on any system, and allowing people to make wallets with any features they want.  Hopefully we'll be able to simplify the wallet to make it easier to use.

Promotional... what?? Does that cover... yeah, lets not get into that. Might edit this with more later but just to touch on the governance part, the worlds first DAO!! Yeah!.. oh, that's promotion.

So, its literally ground breaking, incentivised full nodes that amongst other things get to propose and fund projects directly from the system, be that PR, development, whatever, the masternode operators vote on what funding they do and don't agree with and the system governs its self. No big rows like the block size debate, the system decides how it's going to evolve

Ok, I seem to have got to the top of the page somehow so might as well say something useful while I'm up here. Check the vids under "about", he knows what he's talking about, I don't:

https://www.dashpay.io/

So, the budget allocation. It's only been running since V12 and it's a really really big game changer, seriously, this will become something so central to our way of doing things that we'll wonder how we managed without it. I'm not just talking about Dash btw, even NASDAQ is playing around with some pale imitation for its shareholders voting but in years to come this will empower each and every individual and you heard it here first! (iirc I heard Andreas Antonopoulos talking about it last year sometime). And Bitcoin should get some. It'll be a long and arduous road in getting it established and heading the right way as there's nothing like it to work from and there's bound to be a few wrong turns but hey, we can vote it back around again.

That gets to the issue of who gets to vote. Only those rich and privileged few who can run masternodes, mwahahah!! But we wants more nodes! We wants more network! Pure speculation on my part but Evan has brought up reducing the number of coins needed to run a masternode already and I'd expect it to be in reach of absolutely everyone at some stage, cold storage becomes an interest bearing savings account. That's available to more or less everyone now but that involves third party services pooling funds and when it comes to trusting coins to third party services... that's a problem and I've little doubt it'll be fixed.

That would fix Bitcoins falling node count and bring a host of other benefits in the bargain and all it needs is a little of the block rewards diverted from miners to full nodes, its currently 45% with Dash but with bitcoins higher dollar prices one or two percent would cover the costs of running a full Bitcoin node on a VPS and make a little extra besides.

-------

Incentivising the full nodes and turning them into interest bearing savings is exactly how banks got money out from under the mattress and into their vaults. That would've been fine, take it in, use it wisely but then things got a little creative... but that's another story. Bitcoin doesn't, it sits around anywhere gathering dust or out of sight and some of that creativity can find its way into the system there too. Exchanges collapsing, heists, trading IOUs, lots of things that aren't clear and infallible, there or gone, secure or insecure, they're serious vulnerabilities and can be prevented by incentrivised nodes.

Bitcoin interacts with the legacy system and alts interact with Bitcoin, services like shapeshift bridge the gap. Sorry to disappoint but the legacy system has a tight grip on bitcoin and it doesn't like things that evolve, its a big bloated thing and has a hard time keeping up. That opens up something the legacy system has kept closed shut before though, the doorway to their infrastructure and so to anything that can interact with their system, all the ways we use digital money today.

What Bitcoin doesn't do well is cash, that needs third party services and getting them all to agree on how they're going to do that will be one hell of a challenge and that's where Dash comes in. There will be all kinds of things built on top of Bitcoins security and they'll all be useful in their different ways but it will take time for them to merge or grow into common global systems.

--------

Initial distribution. Yeah, that instawhatever, how does that solve Bitcoins problems? Short answer, it doesn't and if anything it tries to follow Bitcoins initial distribution because Bitcoin did an incredibly good job of it. I only got here mid 2012 but at that time this place was mostly geeks, people that saw the failings of our legacy monetary system and people who cared about financial independence and privacy. Those where the early adopters and a simple name was enough to attract a similar demographic, Darkcoin appealed to the same kind of people and, probably more importantly, it appealed little to those with a "greed is good" mentality because its hard to market a name like that to the masses.

Those initial few hours are also similar to the very early phase of Bitcoin distribution and if anything Bitcoin was distributed to an even smaller number than the trolls wildest imaginings of Dashes beginnings because Dash was released in view of a much wider audience. The detractors figures on who holds how many coins based on the initial few hours after launch can be taken with a pinch of salt, miners jump on every coins launch because the low initial difficulty makes it highly profitable and if anyone wanted a majority stake it would be far easier to stand back and wait for them to sell at low initial prices than to attempt to monopolise mining.

The moderators have said that purely promotional posts are not allowed here. Given that policy, let's have a substantive discussion on ways in which Dash solves many of the problems with Bitcoin.

To wit:

1) Bitcoin's transactions take approximately one hour to fully confirm, or about ten minutes to get one confirm.
2) Bitcoin's transactions are completely traceable and the protocol has no built-in anonymity.
3) Bitcoin's governance system needs improvement.
4) Bitcoin's development funding is based on altruism from the community.

How does Dash solve these problems?

Also, Dash Evolution is currently under development, and is supposed to offer built-in anonymity without ahead-of-time mixing as well as a protocol that is immune to 51% attack. Does anybody have thoughts on how this will be accomplished?