Pages:
Author

Topic: How does the IRS look at anonymous bitcoin? (Read 800 times)

legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
February 04, 2023, 03:36:49 PM
#42
In practice you are gambling that they start an investigation and once it starts the consequences are unpredictable.
Indeed, it's gambling. Especially in places like I live, where there isn't a tax framework to begin with. The tax collector can assume you're okay, just as he can assume you're laundering money.

1) You cannot do anything with cash other than buy small purchases
Depends on what you consider small. Buying an iPhone, a smart TV, and a PS5 isn't going to raise eyes. If you're buying a hundred bitcoins, then a yacht, and then two houses, then yeah, sus.  Tongue

2) They will eventually ban cash, so you will have nothing
You'll have bitcoin.  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 4602
Buy on Amazon with Crypto
February 04, 2023, 03:30:50 PM
#41
And as far as exchanging it for cash, this is useless. 1) You cannot do anything with cash other than buy small purchases, 2) They will eventually ban cash, so you will have nothing

As far as I can tell, you are trapped in BTC. Since it's too much too cash out, and it's too little to start some sort of tax haven structure (and there's still risk anyway)
I think you are fantasizing. The amount of cash can be reduced or a very small country like the Vatican can be controlled. But it can't be done in most countries or unions like USA, Russia, Europe. As soon as governments start imposing restrictions, shadow markets will appear.
sr. member
Activity: 317
Merit: 448
February 04, 2023, 12:10:21 PM
#40
Thanks, yeah how about like 1 entire bitcoin? Lets say someone bought bitcoin every couple weeks over time and has 1 bitcoin. Bought via exchange, and ATMs that don't require ID and just converted to XMR, sent to another address and converted out to bitcoin. So there aren't many records.

And lets say the individual is not going to spend or sell the bitcoin until it reaches 1 million dollars... which could be in the far far future, 20 30 maybe 40 or 50 years from now. Something that makes it possible that records held by the ATM and exchanges could be gone if those exchanges go out of business.



And, if someone had 10 anonymous bitcoins.... I'm thinking they should wait till it goes up past 70k again and move to a more tax forgiving country, or a country that will not be afraid to tell the US to go F-off... And honestly there are few nations that will do that, maybe Russia? Although being prepared to follow all the laws of this new country you have moved to because you've burned your bridges.

What you are asking has been discussed in several threads, for example this one:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5355749

The answer to your question depends a lot on where you live, but to summarize.

Showing up with a Bitcoin when it's worth $1M before tax authorites is the same as suddenly showing up with $1M in dollars that you can't justify.

In the best case scenario you will be charged a tax, which could be capital gains tax with 0 purchase cost in the case of Bitcoin and I am not so sure in the case of cash. It could be the same or it could be income tax.

But I am inclined to think that you would be investigated for tax evasion. Think Al Capone was put in jail for tax evasion: they couldn't prove that he murdered, extorted money, etc. The only thing they could prove was that he had more money than he could legally justify.

So, $1M seems to me a considerable amount of money to open such an investigation. If you have $1k in Bitcoin that you can't justify you're not going to have problems but when the amount gets big you risk ending up in jail.



That's crazy they wont take "I bought bitcoin back when it was around 20k and held onto it for years" approach! What are the probably many other people who still have bitcoin from 2013 and so on when it was only a few thousand but they bought from one of the plentiful non KYC exchanges?

So is it if you just show up with 1 mil out of no where? Or is it so long as they can see that the bitcoin has sat in a wallet for a long time but is just not connected to a paper trail, would that matter?

Either way, something tells me the totalitarian states of America is not the place to be when you want to cash out.

It's going to be the same in any developed mainstream country. How do you think authorities will react when you show up with 1 million worth of BTC?
I've seen some people claim if you just claim 0 cost purchase and pay your taxes they will leave you alone but with I think they are lying and just hoping that's how it works.
In practice you are gambling that they start an investigation and once it starts the consequences are unpredictable. You may get a slap in the wrist or you may end up in big trouble. The question is, is it worth doing this gamble?

And as far as exchanging it for cash, this is useless. 1) You cannot do anything with cash other than buy small purchases, 2) They will eventually ban cash, so you will have nothing

As far as I can tell, you are trapped in BTC. Since it's too much too cash out, and it's too little to start some sort of tax haven structure (and there's still risk anyway)
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 4602
Buy on Amazon with Crypto
February 01, 2023, 08:56:18 AM
#39
Fiscal authorities are often quite relaxed about Bitcoin since every transaction is well documented. At some point, the "anonymous" user will want to use the coins, and create a situation where the fiscal authorities can know that they exist. At this point, it would be up to the taxpayer to prove that there were no taxable transactions before that point...
If the user has at least a little brains, then he will not change his bitcoins for cash. First, he will change them for Monero, or similar coins, then he will change these coins for stablecoins. The exchange amounts of stablecoins for cash will be those that are not subject to mandatory taxation or, in the worst case, a small fine. But linking the user to the first original bitcoins would be very difficult.

As long as there are still countries where the authorities don't care from where millions in stablecoins suddenly appeared, yes, this will work. Provided that the stablecoins don't collapse Wink
If the price of stablecoins collapses, then you will legally not need to declare it Smiley
I think that an adequate person first thinks about his own safety and his family, and then looks for a solution to his tax issues. Every country has different situations and it is impossible to give universal advice.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
If the user has at least a little brains, then he will not change his bitcoins for cash. First, he will change them for Monero, or similar coins, then he will change these coins for stablecoins.

But strictly speaking, in each of these exchanges a taxable event is potentially created.

The exchange amounts of stablecoins for cash will be those that are not subject to mandatory taxation or, in the worst case, a small fine. But linking the user to the first original bitcoins would be very difficult.

Yes, well, I always repeat the same thing here. It's not the same if you file with the tax authorities with $1k in stablecoins of dubious origin than if you file with $1M. The $1k may have been paid to you for selling anything over the internet. $1M can potentially create more problems for you.
member
Activity: 189
Merit: 16
Fiscal authorities are often quite relaxed about Bitcoin since every transaction is well documented. At some point, the "anonymous" user will want to use the coins, and create a situation where the fiscal authorities can know that they exist. At this point, it would be up to the taxpayer to prove that there were no taxable transactions before that point...
If the user has at least a little brains, then he will not change his bitcoins for cash. First, he will change them for Monero, or similar coins, then he will change these coins for stablecoins. The exchange amounts of stablecoins for cash will be those that are not subject to mandatory taxation or, in the worst case, a small fine. But linking the user to the first original bitcoins would be very difficult.

As long as there are still countries where the authorities don't care from where millions in stablecoins suddenly appeared, yes, this will work. Provided that the stablecoins don't collapse Wink
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 4602
Buy on Amazon with Crypto
Fiscal authorities are often quite relaxed about Bitcoin since every transaction is well documented. At some point, the "anonymous" user will want to use the coins, and create a situation where the fiscal authorities can know that they exist. At this point, it would be up to the taxpayer to prove that there were no taxable transactions before that point...
If the user has at least a little brains, then he will not change his bitcoins for cash. First, he will change them for Monero, or similar coins, then he will change these coins for stablecoins. The exchange amounts of stablecoins for cash will be those that are not subject to mandatory taxation or, in the worst case, a small fine. But linking the user to the first original bitcoins would be very difficult.
sr. member
Activity: 317
Merit: 448
If memory serves me correctly, they have their own blockchain analyzer and tracer.  However, something like Wasabi Wallet might make the IRS's job a bit harder and keep them a little more honest perhaps.

I've also been wondering, how do they look at these millionaires who cash out from before KYC was a thing?

These millionaires have lawyers and tax advisors on their payroll, who provide them with solutions to what you are talking about. Instead of asking in a forum, they ask their lawyers about the doubts you mention.

Besides, you are taking a lot of things for granted, which need not be the case:

The gov going to arrest them because they cant prove how they bought them?

Not in all cases are millionaires going to be unable to prove that. And in any case, most of them legalized their situation long ago, not now. Look at the Winklevoss twins for example.

Yeah I mean if crypto makes me a millionaire I'd be sure to talk to tax lawyers if I wanted to stay in the US. There is no point right now as I'm probably at a huge loss. However, from the sounds of it, it sounds like the gov is literally out to try to get you even if you do that. Like face the risk of hiring a lawyer and getting charged and possibly convicted of something anyways so is it really even worth it? Moving to another country would suck but at least you'd be free from unfair tax laws from a literally evil government that tries to punish you for doing the "right" thing and being law abiding. Since having private bitcoin isn't illegal, nor is not saving receipts of purchase.   

And I was under the impression a lot of bitcoin out there is still in the unknown. As in there are holders of it who have not revealed they own it. Is that really all a thing of the past? I heard that some years back that a lot of bitcoin addresses are held by unknown entities and have been holding from 2013? or something like that. Ancient whales or something. So like some of it is probably people who could have mined it on a laptop or something, or maybe bought and literally forgot about it until recently ish or something idk. I was under the assumption it's still a thing. Idk if most of them revealed themselves when it went up to 60 70k? Idk. Like I feel like there are tons of people who didn't cash out because it didn't make them rich, just like bought a small amount or just a few bitcoins when it was cheap or something long ago, and are just waiting till it reaches a mil. Idk. What metric can we use to measure that?

Many of the the "ancient whales" renounced US citizenship years ago and moved elsewhere. The thing is, back then it was less common to keep track of stuff, so I guess they would bother less about it and understand that Bitcoin "wasn't a thing", but right now they have Chainalysis and all that stuff, so depositing any mixed coins in an exchange is already a risk as you could end up with frozen funds.

I would look into what is the best move before doing anything tho. If the coins aren't tied to any KYC actions then you have all the time in the world since no government will know unless you say so. Once you claim you have bitcoins there is no way to undo that, they already know, so you must have a plan.

If you were in the EU it would be easier to move elsewhere, but IRS is another story.
member
Activity: 189
Merit: 16
Fiscal authorities are often quite relaxed about Bitcoin since every transaction is well documented. At some point, the "anonymous" user will want to use the coins, and create a situation where the fiscal authorities can know that they exist. At this point, it would be up to the taxpayer to prove that there were no taxable transactions before that point...
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
The IRS (Internal Revenue Service) views anonymous bitcoin transactions as taxable events. In fact, the IRS has issued guidance stating that virtual currency, including bitcoin, is treated as property for tax purposes. This means that any gains or losses from the sale or exchange of bitcoin are subject to capital gains taxes. Additionally, individuals and businesses that receive bitcoin as payment for goods or services must report it as income on their tax returns.

However, it should be noted that while the IRS can track bitcoin transactions that are conducted on public ledgers, it may be more difficult for them to trace transactions that are made on private or anonymous networks. This is one of the reasons why it is important for individuals to accurately report any bitcoin transactions on their tax returns, even if they were conducted anonymously. It is also important to note that in some countries, anonymous transactions are illegal and can be subject to penalties.
member
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
If memory serves me correctly, they have their own blockchain analyzer and tracer.  However, something like Wasabi Wallet might make the IRS's job a bit harder and keep them a little more honest perhaps.

I've also been wondering, how do they look at these millionaires who cash out from before KYC was a thing?

These millionaires have lawyers and tax advisors on their payroll, who provide them with solutions to what you are talking about. Instead of asking in a forum, they ask their lawyers about the doubts you mention.

Besides, you are taking a lot of things for granted, which need not be the case:

The gov going to arrest them because they cant prove how they bought them?

Not in all cases are millionaires going to be unable to prove that. And in any case, most of them legalized their situation long ago, not now. Look at the Winklevoss twins for example.

Yeah I mean if crypto makes me a millionaire I'd be sure to talk to tax lawyers if I wanted to stay in the US. There is no point right now as I'm probably at a huge loss. However, from the sounds of it, it sounds like the gov is literally out to try to get you even if you do that. Like face the risk of hiring a lawyer and getting charged and possibly convicted of something anyways so is it really even worth it? Moving to another country would suck but at least you'd be free from unfair tax laws from a literally evil government that tries to punish you for doing the "right" thing and being law abiding. Since having private bitcoin isn't illegal, nor is not saving receipts of purchase.   

And I was under the impression a lot of bitcoin out there is still in the unknown. As in there are holders of it who have not revealed they own it. Is that really all a thing of the past? I heard that some years back that a lot of bitcoin addresses are held by unknown entities and have been holding from 2013? or something like that. Ancient whales or something. So like some of it is probably people who could have mined it on a laptop or something, or maybe bought and literally forgot about it until recently ish or something idk. I was under the assumption it's still a thing. Idk if most of them revealed themselves when it went up to 60 70k? Idk. Like I feel like there are tons of people who didn't cash out because it didn't make them rich, just like bought a small amount or just a few bitcoins when it was cheap or something long ago, and are just waiting till it reaches a mil. Idk. What metric can we use to measure that?
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
If memory serves me correctly, they have their own blockchain analyzer and tracer.  However, something like Wasabi Wallet might make the IRS's job a bit harder and keep them a little more honest perhaps.

I've also been wondering, how do they look at these millionaires who cash out from before KYC was a thing?

These millionaires have lawyers and tax advisors on their payroll, who provide them with solutions to what you are talking about. Instead of asking in a forum, they ask their lawyers about the doubts you mention.

Besides, you are taking a lot of things for granted, which need not be the case:

The gov going to arrest them because they cant prove how they bought them?

Not in all cases are millionaires going to be unable to prove that. And in any case, most of them legalized their situation long ago, not now. Look at the Winklevoss twins for example.
member
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
If memory serves me correctly, they have their own blockchain analyzer and tracer.  However, something like Wasabi Wallet might make the IRS's job a bit harder and keep them a little more honest perhaps.


I've also been wondering, how do they look at these millionaires who cash out from before KYC was a thing? Back when you didn't need KYC, surely there are some anonymous whales right now who will eventually cash out. The gov going to arrest them because they cant prove how they bought them? Clearly, you'd see the bitcoin, just sitting for a long time somewhere. I guess maybe they forgive that since there were no KYC requirements for the longest time. I mean hell, there are still anonymous ways to buy it, or ways to anonymize it. They going to go after everyone after a certain date or what?

It's probably somewhat easy to hide the paper trail. I just hate the fact that wanting privacy is treated like a criminal offense even though it's not at all illegal. If bitcoin goes to the tens of millions I'll prob be forced to play it safe and revoke my citizenship and move to a more crypto friendly nation, of which, idk atm. Maybe declare my millions, pay whatever tax on it, then reapply for US citizenship if I want to come back. Such a fucking hassle to merely cash out. Well, I guess the US gov will miss out on the taxes I'd pay on cashing out. Dumb fucks, their loss.

hero member
Activity: 2548
Merit: 607
If memory serves me correctly, they have their own blockchain analyzer and tracer.  However, something like Wasabi Wallet might make the IRS's job a bit harder and keep them a little more honest perhaps.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
I don't think they need to care. If there are undeclared earnings, they can be taxed at least when someone tries to somehow use the bitcoins...

That is fine in theory but in practice the states through the IRS and equivalents have a virtually unlimited collection voracity.

If you mean that someone who has not declared their earnings, when they go to spend that money will pay VAT and other similar taxes, I might agree with you, what happens is that the IRS wants to tax people for the income tax the capital gains tax and then apart from that they want them to pay VAT when they spend their after tax money.



member
Activity: 189
Merit: 16
I don't think they need to care. If there are undeclared earnings, they can be taxed at least when someone tries to somehow use the bitcoins...
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
https://beincrypto.com/latvian-nft-artist-8-7-million-earnings-seized-allegations-money-laundering/
Latvian NFT Artist €8.7 Million Earnings Seized Over Allegations of Money Laundering
"The Latvian government has frozen NFT artist Ilya Borisov’s earnings of around €8.7 million over allegations of money laundering. He faces up to 12 years in jail if found guilty."

I understand that this case is with NFT tokens, but any of your income in cryptocurrency may be considered illegal by the tax authorities.

Well, in any case it will be the income in crypto that you cannot clearly justify.

Besides, as I have commented several times in these cases, the amount matters, and a lot. It is not the same that the Ministry of Finance or the IRS or equivalent in your country, thinks you have €8.7M of dubious origin that the amount is only €870. In the first case he faces up to 12 years in jail if found guilty. In the second case the penalty if found guilty will not be more than a small fine (I understand that this is the case in many countries, although I do not dare to say that it is the same in all of them).

I've seen people on other forums say that NFTs would be a good way to launder money, but in light of news like this, it doesn't look like they are.

Edit: I'd like to know what o_e_l_e_o  or LoyceV think about this, as we have discussed similar topics in other threads.

I have searched for more information but cannot find more details. Without them, I speculate that the sales of NFTs that he has declared are not registered like the sale of a house or a car in which in a contract the names of the buyer and seller are put and both are perfectly identified.

And this is what I had seen in other forums say: that to launder money a good way would be to create an NFT and say that you have sold it when in fact the funds have been transferred to yourself from an unidentifiable source, either with Monero, or with Bitcoin that has gone through a mixer or similar systems.


legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 4602
Buy on Amazon with Crypto
https://beincrypto.com/latvian-nft-artist-8-7-million-earnings-seized-allegations-money-laundering/
Latvian NFT Artist €8.7 Million Earnings Seized Over Allegations of Money Laundering
"The Latvian government has frozen NFT artist Ilya Borisov’s earnings of around €8.7 million over allegations of money laundering. He faces up to 12 years in jail if found guilty."

I understand that this case is with NFT tokens, but any of your income in cryptocurrency may be considered illegal by the tax authorities.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
Yeah they hate privacy for sure... but there is no law against making your coins private. Say swapping to xmr and back. So I dont get what they can do from a criminal law standpoint, they need evidence you did something wrong right? If they have nothing because it's just bitcoin that showed up some time ago from an xmr swap, it's just a new fresh bitcoin, and if it sat for years and suddenly goes to an exchange. Like they can suspect maybe you did something wrong but what can they do about it unless they crack xmr itself?

The only thing i can think of is maybe them wondering if you paid taxes on the swap when you swapped from xmr to bitcoin but guess what, you only have to report anything if you made a profit. no cap gains taxes on losses. So just convert during a bear market.

As I told you in a previous message, the answer will depend a lot on where you live and how inquisitorial the IRS or the Treasury Department of your country is.

The only thing to remember is that Al Capone got locked up for tax evasion. It wasn't Bitcoin, but all they could prove was that he had a lot more money than he could justify.

Are there any known cases of anyone getting in legal issues from crypto because they kept their coins private?

If we are talking about high amounts, there will be. Remember that the greater the amount, the greater the problem. Having $2K in cash of undeclared origin is not a problem, but having $2M in either cash or Bitcoin of dubious origin can land you in jail. I would take action long before the amount gets higher, rather than having plausible deniability as the only plan.
member
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
That's crazy they wont take "I bought bitcoin back when it was around 20k and held onto it for years" approach! What are the probably many other people who still have bitcoin from 2013 and so on when it was only a few thousand but they bought from one of the plentiful non KYC exchanges?

So is it if you just show up with 1 mil out of no where? Or is it so long as they can see that the bitcoin has sat in a wallet for a long time but is just not connected to a paper trail, would that matter?

Either way, something tells me the totalitarian states of America is not the place to be when you want to cash out.

If you got your Bitcoins in 2013 and they are in the same direction today, you are in a good position, or you moved them but the transactions are clear and you can sign messages from the addresses. The only thing is that if you can't prove the purchase price, you will most likely be charged a 0 purchase cost, which won't make much difference with the real purchase price, since almost everything is profit.

If you moved the Bitcoins by mixers for "privacy" I think you have it more complicated as the IRS does not like privacy.



Yeah they hate privacy for sure... but there is no law against making your coins private. Say swapping to xmr and back. So I dont get what they can do from a criminal law standpoint, they need evidence you did something wrong right? If they have nothing because it's just bitcoin that showed up some time ago from an xmr swap, it's just a new fresh bitcoin, and if it sat for years and suddenly goes to an exchange. Like they can suspect maybe you did something wrong but what can they do about it unless they crack xmr itself?

The only thing i can think of is maybe them wondering if you paid taxes on the swap when you swapped from xmr to bitcoin but guess what, you only have to report anything if you made a profit. no cap gains taxes on losses. So just convert during a bear market.

Are there any known cases of anyone getting in legal issues from crypto because they kept their coins private?
Pages:
Jump to: