Pages:
Author

Topic: How Eco friendly is our money and is there an alternative? - page 2. (Read 440 times)

legendary
Activity: 4466
Merit: 3391
The problem with these claims that Bitcoin uses X times as much energy as Y is that they don't compare total energy usage. For example, this article quotes data center usage for some big companies but that is only a small part of the company's footprint. What about manufacturing, or even the energy cost of employees driving to work?
hero member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 529
Wow, Bitcoin consumes more power than many multinational companies combined and more power than a whole country of Ecuador. Eh, certainly BTC is not power efficient I think we all can agree on that.
Well, That's a very good and informative article.
hero member
Activity: 1834
Merit: 759
Woah, excellent write-up man! Incredibly detailed.

Bitcoin being insanely inefficient in terms of power consumption isn't a new subject, but I have never seen it compared to other cryptos, and even USD. It's not a good look for us with the numbers being as lopsided as they are. It's still a rather obscure issue, and until it makes it to the foreground, it can never be addressed. People who are against Bitcoin are going to have a field day with your article, but that may be necessary to push innovation.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
★Jetwin.com★
Good post man, very informative. Interesting to see that Ethereum is still way below Bitcoin in terms of energy consumption. Maybe in the future we`ll see the trend shift from PoW to PoS to be more environment friendly (would be good to see some data on this one with just nodes running to stake).
Pages:
Jump to: