it's not always about allocation, we also have to look at it from the perspective of whether investors are interested in the project.
if it never fails in distribution, but the coin is only worth 5-7 $ after you promote it for months and finally the project dies, then the conclusion will remain the same, or worst is you only get a token distribution without value, quality is never related with marketing allocation.
Topic: How i presently feel about bounties - page 6. (Read 826 times)
Personally, I am very careful about projects since many projects do not collect the required amount and then simply disappear. Or it happens that they collect the necessary amount and then change the conditions for issuing remuneration. And they make such conditions so that it is not possible to receive their awards. And there are such projects where the conditions are very simple and the rewards are paid according to the conditions and it is very pleasant to work with such projects even though the rewards will be the most minimal.
It seem you still have little experience in bounty hunting. Amount of bounty allocation no longer determine the payment success of a bounty. There are many ways now in which project dev cheat hunters. Apart from project that turn to scam, irrespective of the amount allocated. My experience has shown that some dev will end up frustrating hunters in order to give up pursuing their reward. Jinbi, Subaj etc are few of those that have done that with the hunters.
Lucky if you found a good project that promise huge amount of rewards and considered as legit. Ive been a hunter and try many type of campaign and to tell you Ive experienced promoting huge and small bounty rewards. You have a point but sometime there are good rewards also but you need to do a thorough research. Try to focus on those Manager that has high reputation and if they set a budget and its big I'm sure its more legit.
Nowadays even if you find thoroughly the result will be the same. Projects that looks to be legit turns out to be a scam. Small or big rewards , you are luck if it pays you, also, not all small paying projects are really paying. Remember, there are 90% scam projects in the entire crypto world. Another thing, participating in projects handled by a reputable manager can be the way, since they won't accept a project that will ruin their reputation.
I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place
That low allocation is based on total supply of tokens, not the number of given tokens. And you also want to pay attention on how they are they distributing non-ico promotional or bounty tokens because some advisors will dump them as well. It doesn't matter if you get paid if 10% of total supply is now free tokens dumping sell pressure on the markets.
I think it makes more sense than they write hundreds of thousands of dollars on their threads, usually they do it to get more bounty hunters while they don't know where they get the money to pay bounty hunters, if it's still in the tens of thousands of dollars for the market which is not bullish yet I think it's very reasonable for now and I feel they continue to pay even a little, but I see again there are not many bounty hunters at this time like the previous year, does that indicate everything is over, not many successful projects
I do not remember exactly how the allocation thing works. Been a bit long I participated in a bounty, but your observation sounds reasonable, because not all that glitter is Gold. Many creators of bounties tend to hype or exaggerate things to attract "hunters".
I think you made an important observation, whether true or not I don't know... Others should probably research into it to see if it's a fact or not, they could benefit from it as well, if it does really work
I think you made an important observation, whether true or not I don't know... Others should probably research into it to see if it's a fact or not, they could benefit from it as well, if it does really work
If that's what you think, then do it to promote the bounty with a small allocation, but it's also not certain whether to pay or not because there is no guarantee in my opinion.
Indeed, it is difficult for us to distinguish between bounties that really pay us, so if I will take my own actions because I have my own judgment about the bounty.
Indeed, it is difficult for us to distinguish between bounties that really pay us, so if I will take my own actions because I have my own judgment about the bounty.
If that's what you think with those bounty projects and you have seen a result with it through experimentation by joining a bounty with that allocation, do it.
The days when most bounties that were giving thousands worth of tokens in dollars with their stakes are now gone and you just have to move on guys.
The days when most bounties that were giving thousands worth of tokens in dollars with their stakes are now gone and you just have to move on guys.
Either the project have potential or not bounty hunters will dump anyways and use the money to buy other old coins, my point is it doesn't matter, it depends on what you want, if you want to hold bounty rewards then look very deeply but if you want to dump then go for any bounty with low allocation
Lucky if you found a good project that promise huge amount of rewards and considered as legit. Ive been a hunter and try many type of campaign and to tell you Ive experienced promoting huge and small bounty rewards. You have a point but sometime there are good rewards also but you need to do a thorough research. Try to focus on those Manager that has high reputation and if they set a budget and its big I'm sure its more legit.
The team will have more motivation to develop the project well and list on exchange because they do have more tokens in the bags than those developers who distributed millions of tokens to the bounty hunters which probably the reason the team didn't scam. The price of the token gets dump still though.
They both have pros and cons. And I still prefer to join if ever in bounties that have working product already even the allocation is low or high, as long as they have escrow they budget for bounty payments. While it's good that the supply is circulated all through out bounties, investors and team. Scam can always happen if the team really intend to do so.
The team will have more motivation to develop the project well and list on exchange because they do have more tokens in the bags than those developers who distributed millions of tokens to the bounty hunters which probably the reason the team didn't scam. The price of the token gets dump still though.
I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place
It is because they allocate rewards which is more realistic than promising hundreds of thousand dollars. It is more like they focus on the project than raising funds for themselves. These days, those kinds of projects is much better than projects with huge allocation, unlike before, scam projects is really limited and projects with huge allocation is still possible. 
I still like to promote projects that have good potential whether they are paying huge or small allocation, it still goes on how good the project is and how it managed to generate funding, I stopped looking on the bounty and only concentrate if the project will become successful in the market.
The truth remains that it's very difficult pinpointing these projects with potentials which eventually end up achieving the aims for which they're set up for. Most of these promising projects end up getting abandoned on the way and causing all who have hoped in them severe disappointment. Talking about the reward pool, I rather go for one with huge reward than one with a few tokens. I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place
I still like to promote projects that have good potential whether they are paying huge or small allocation, it still goes on how good the project is and how it managed to generate funding, I stopped looking on the bounty and only concentrate if the project will become successful in the market.
I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place
Jump to: