Topic: How long will it take to reach 1 billion difficulty? (Read 2328 times)
Jan 14 might be true if all the hardware ships, but it doesn't look right as investing USD 10k+ on these hardware isn't everyone's game. So, mining has to slow down at some time and historical rate may not be very accurate in that case to speculate projected difficulty.
Almost 800 TH right now
Hash Rate 782,184.94 GH/s
Last change 04/09/2013 04:21 256032 86 933 018 x1.15
Last 120 05/09/2013 04:49 256190-256310 109 096 217 x1.25
Last 10 05/09/2013 19:47 256300-256310 150 925 378 x1.74
Next 15/09/2013 11:34 258048 107 693 341 x1.24
Hash Rate 782,184.94 GH/s
Last change 04/09/2013 04:21 256032 86 933 018 x1.15
Last 120 05/09/2013 04:49 256190-256310 109 096 217 x1.25
Last 10 05/09/2013 19:47 256300-256310 150 925 378 x1.74
Next 15/09/2013 11:34 258048 107 693 341 x1.24
Let's be reasonable. It will take another 6 months or so before it hits 1 billion diff.
You may very well be correct, I even hope you ARE correct, but if you look at who is getting ready to ship what, you'll see that 6 months is unreasonable. I'd count us lucky if it takes until the end of January. It all depends on how many companies are BFLing us. 
Let's be reasonable. It will take another 6 months or so before it hits 1 billion diff.
How long will it take to reach 1 billion difficulty? What are your thoughts on this?
November 20-25 or so when KnC has started to deliver there 2nd batch of miners. Let me show you a pretty nice calculator where you can try for yourself:
http://btcinvest.net/bitcoin-mining-profit-calculator.php
The really slick thing in comparison to other calcs is that you can set the initial difficulty increase for the first jump and how much the percentual growth of difficulty will lower each jump. (Since it is likely to go down as difficulty reaches bigger numbers.
Lets say the difficulty jumps by 30% this time and the percentual growth goes back by 3% for each jump. (Meaning from the first to second jump it would increase by 27%.):
http://btcinvest.net/bitcoin-mining-profit-calculator.php?diff=65750060.149085&dcosts=500&diff_mincrease=30&blpbtc=25&dhsmhs=860&diff_mincreasedecrease=3&btcusd=132.51&dpowcon=30&btcusd_mincrease=1&pcost=0.25&calcweeks=32&dleadtime=0&action=calc
It would reach 1 billion by the sixth of february 2014 then.
Generally I would say that the difficulty is skyrocketing at the moment and its very hard to tell whats gonna happen to it, but I go with 1 Billion by 2014/02/06
Nice calculator, a lot better put together than the x% jump forever the crowd now uses. I think it need a little tweek though, I think the next 3-5 increases with be larger than the last and then start tapering off fairly quickly. if possible add a % increase and # month increase to the calc.http://btcinvest.net/bitcoin-mining-profit-calculator.php
The really slick thing in comparison to other calcs is that you can set the initial difficulty increase for the first jump and how much the percentual growth of difficulty will lower each jump. (Since it is likely to go down as difficulty reaches bigger numbers.
Lets say the difficulty jumps by 30% this time and the percentual growth goes back by 3% for each jump. (Meaning from the first to second jump it would increase by 27%.):
http://btcinvest.net/bitcoin-mining-profit-calculator.php?diff=65750060.149085&dcosts=500&diff_mincrease=30&blpbtc=25&dhsmhs=860&diff_mincreasedecrease=3&btcusd=132.51&dpowcon=30&btcusd_mincrease=1&pcost=0.25&calcweeks=32&dleadtime=0&action=calc
It would reach 1 billion by the sixth of february 2014 then.
Generally I would say that the difficulty is skyrocketing at the moment and its very hard to tell whats gonna happen to it, but I go with 1 Billion by 2014/02/06
It would only take a 'bent' or a 'couple of bent' pool operators to leverage a 51% attack.
If it happens, those pools will quickly lose all their miners. It would be suicide. 
It is just a transition.
The reality is that as it rises exponentially, it also becomes exponentially difficult to increase it.
What we are seeing is the transition from Bi-planes to jets.
Once we hit 26nm en mass it will slow down, the reality is that this could be the start of the end for bitcoin, specifically because the distribution is being centralized into a small number of pools.
It matters not what the overall distribution of miners is, but rather the pool distribution.
It would only take a 'bent' or a 'couple of bent' pool operators to leverage a 51% attack.
The reality is that as it rises exponentially, it also becomes exponentially difficult to increase it.
What we are seeing is the transition from Bi-planes to jets.
Once we hit 26nm en mass it will slow down, the reality is that this could be the start of the end for bitcoin, specifically because the distribution is being centralized into a small number of pools.
It matters not what the overall distribution of miners is, but rather the pool distribution.
It would only take a 'bent' or a 'couple of bent' pool operators to leverage a 51% attack.
To do what? Destroy their business by destroying bitcoin? What would that achieve?
JimiQ84 raises an interesting point that I have recently been discussing with some of my other bitcoin friends. I think JimiQ84's concern is a valid one, but perhaps not so much because of bent pool operators. My fear is that with these huge concentrated centers of power...they will be all that much easier for the 'authority' to take out in one single well-coordinated swoop.
So, all you members out there with more history than I (most of you I suspect):
"Yeah, the network is that much more secure...but do you guys feel this tendancy towards mega-mining POP's could potentially threaten BTC in the long run?"
Let me show you a pretty nice calculator where you can try for yourself:
http://btcinvest.net/bitcoin-mining-profit-calculator.php
The really slick thing in comparison to other calcs is that you can set the initial difficulty increase for the first jump and how much the percentual growth of difficulty will lower each jump. (Since it is likely to go down as difficulty reaches bigger numbers.
Lets say the difficulty jumps by 30% this time and the percentual growth goes back by 3% for each jump. (Meaning from the first to second jump it would increase by 27%.):
http://btcinvest.net/bitcoin-mining-profit-calculator.php?diff=65750060.149085&dcosts=500&diff_mincrease=30&blpbtc=25&dhsmhs=860&diff_mincreasedecrease=3&btcusd=132.51&dpowcon=30&btcusd_mincrease=1&pcost=0.25&calcweeks=32&dleadtime=0&action=calc
It would reach 1 billion by the sixth of february 2014 then.
Generally I would say that the difficulty is skyrocketing at the moment and its very hard to tell whats gonna happen to it, but I go with 1 Billion by 2014/02/06
Nice calculator, a lot better put together than the x% jump forever the crowd now uses. I think it need a little tweek though, I think the next 3-5 increases with be larger than the last and then start tapering off fairly quickly. if possible add a % increase and # month increase to the calc.http://btcinvest.net/bitcoin-mining-profit-calculator.php
The really slick thing in comparison to other calcs is that you can set the initial difficulty increase for the first jump and how much the percentual growth of difficulty will lower each jump. (Since it is likely to go down as difficulty reaches bigger numbers.
Lets say the difficulty jumps by 30% this time and the percentual growth goes back by 3% for each jump. (Meaning from the first to second jump it would increase by 27%.):
http://btcinvest.net/bitcoin-mining-profit-calculator.php?diff=65750060.149085&dcosts=500&diff_mincrease=30&blpbtc=25&dhsmhs=860&diff_mincreasedecrease=3&btcusd=132.51&dpowcon=30&btcusd_mincrease=1&pcost=0.25&calcweeks=32&dleadtime=0&action=calc
It would reach 1 billion by the sixth of february 2014 then.
Generally I would say that the difficulty is skyrocketing at the moment and its very hard to tell whats gonna happen to it, but I go with 1 Billion by 2014/02/06
Let me show you a pretty nice calculator where you can try for yourself:
http://btcinvest.net/bitcoin-mining-profit-calculator.php
The really slick thing in comparison to other calcs is that you can set the initial difficulty increase for the first jump and how much the percentual growth of difficulty will lower each jump. (Since it is likely to go down as difficulty reaches bigger numbers.
Lets say the difficulty jumps by 30% this time and the percentual growth goes back by 3% for each jump. (Meaning from the first to second jump it would increase by 27%.):
http://btcinvest.net/bitcoin-mining-profit-calculator.php?diff=65750060.149085&dcosts=500&diff_mincrease=30&blpbtc=25&dhsmhs=860&diff_mincreasedecrease=3&btcusd=132.51&dpowcon=30&btcusd_mincrease=1&pcost=0.25&calcweeks=32&dleadtime=0&action=calc
It would reach 1 billion by the sixth of february 2014 then.
Generally I would say that the difficulty is skyrocketing at the moment and its very hard to tell whats gonna happen to it, but I go with 1 Billion by 2014/02/06
Nice calculator, a lot better put together than the x% jump forever the crowd now uses. I think it need a little tweek though, I think the next 3-5 increases with be larger than the last and then start tapering off fairly quickly. if possible add a % increase and # month increase to the calc. http://btcinvest.net/bitcoin-mining-profit-calculator.php
The really slick thing in comparison to other calcs is that you can set the initial difficulty increase for the first jump and how much the percentual growth of difficulty will lower each jump. (Since it is likely to go down as difficulty reaches bigger numbers.
Lets say the difficulty jumps by 30% this time and the percentual growth goes back by 3% for each jump. (Meaning from the first to second jump it would increase by 27%.):
http://btcinvest.net/bitcoin-mining-profit-calculator.php?diff=65750060.149085&dcosts=500&diff_mincrease=30&blpbtc=25&dhsmhs=860&diff_mincreasedecrease=3&btcusd=132.51&dpowcon=30&btcusd_mincrease=1&pcost=0.25&calcweeks=32&dleadtime=0&action=calc
It would reach 1 billion by the sixth of february 2014 then.
Generally I would say that the difficulty is skyrocketing at the moment and its very hard to tell whats gonna happen to it, but I go with 1 Billion by 2014/02/06
Let me show you a pretty nice calculator where you can try for yourself:
http://btcinvest.net/bitcoin-mining-profit-calculator.php
The really slick thing in comparison to other calcs is that you can set the initial difficulty increase for the first jump and how much the percentual growth of difficulty will lower each jump. (Since it is likely to go down as difficulty reaches bigger numbers.
Lets say the difficulty jumps by 30% this time and the percentual growth goes back by 3% for each jump. (Meaning from the first to second jump it would increase by 27%.):
http://btcinvest.net/bitcoin-mining-profit-calculator.php?diff=65750060.149085&dcosts=500&diff_mincrease=30&blpbtc=25&dhsmhs=860&diff_mincreasedecrease=3&btcusd=132.51&dpowcon=30&btcusd_mincrease=1&pcost=0.25&calcweeks=32&dleadtime=0&action=calc
It would reach 1 billion by the sixth of february 2014 then.
Generally I would say that the difficulty is skyrocketing at the moment and its very hard to tell whats gonna happen to it, but I go with 1 Billion by 2014/02/06
http://btcinvest.net/bitcoin-mining-profit-calculator.php
The really slick thing in comparison to other calcs is that you can set the initial difficulty increase for the first jump and how much the percentual growth of difficulty will lower each jump. (Since it is likely to go down as difficulty reaches bigger numbers.
Lets say the difficulty jumps by 30% this time and the percentual growth goes back by 3% for each jump. (Meaning from the first to second jump it would increase by 27%.):
http://btcinvest.net/bitcoin-mining-profit-calculator.php?diff=65750060.149085&dcosts=500&diff_mincrease=30&blpbtc=25&dhsmhs=860&diff_mincreasedecrease=3&btcusd=132.51&dpowcon=30&btcusd_mincrease=1&pcost=0.25&calcweeks=32&dleadtime=0&action=calc
It would reach 1 billion by the sixth of february 2014 then.
Generally I would say that the difficulty is skyrocketing at the moment and its very hard to tell whats gonna happen to it, but I go with 1 Billion by 2014/02/06
I am predicting March of 2014.
This - You guys really believe in X^2 to happen month after month after month? Someone needs to show some mathematics to substantiate the GH required to make it 1B by next January.
If Cointerra, Hashfash, Terrahash, and Bitfury all happen together around early Dec, then Yes its possible. (Anyone who regards BFL or Avalon as a threat needs to realize that those are now the larger chipsizes) BFL is simply doing a dead cat bounce and clawing for their life to keep money coming in ala Monarch announcement.
Difficulty doesn't have to increase exponentially forever to reach 1 billion by early 2014. I would estimate that >6 PH/s has already been sold. The various companies may be delayed a month or two but even so that would put us near 1 billion difficulty in early January. The fact that "BFL sucks" is pretty much irrelevant. They have 3 PH/s worth of chips, those chips will be deployed. There is no reason not to. They are a sunk cost at this point. The people who bought rigs may end up negative ROI% but BFL has no reason to not delivery them. Even if their anemic rollout doesn't improve they should complete shipping of 65nm pre-orders by January. It is highly likely that even if the long term growth rate slows we could see a couple of very high difficult gains (>100% in 2 week period) if the various companies happen to ship in volume over the same period of time.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/estimate-of-asic-pre-orders-13-to-15-phs-diff-18b-to-21b-by-end-of-2013-283820
X^2 is obviously impossible, X currently = 65M difficulty. X^2 = 4.225 Quadrillion.
he meant x*2
I am predicting March of 2014.
This - You guys really believe in X^2 to happen month after month after month? Someone needs to show some mathematics to substantiate the GH required to make it 1B by next January.
If Cointerra, Hashfash, Terrahash, and Bitfury all happen together around early Dec, then Yes its possible. (Anyone who regards BFL or Avalon as a threat needs to realize that those are now the larger chipsizes) BFL is simply doing a dead cat bounce and clawing for their life to keep money coming in ala Monarch announcement.
Quote
Once we hit 26nm en mass it will slow down,
Attn Viceroy: Inaba sockpuppet alert.
I am predicting March of 2014.
This - You guys really believe in X^2 to happen month after month after month? Someone needs to show some mathematics to substantiate the GH required to make it 1B by next January.
If Cointerra, Hashfash, Terrahash, and Bitfury all happen together around early Dec, then Yes its possible. (Anyone who regards BFL or Avalon as a threat needs to realize that those are now the larger chipsizes) BFL is simply doing a dead cat bounce and clawing for their life to keep money coming in ala Monarch announcement.
I am predicting March of 2014.
How long will it take to reach 1 billion difficulty? What are your thoughts on this?
If all of the current companies can ship on time I would predict 1 billion difficulty by Nov 15th. As more and more default though, that date keeps getting pushed back. It is just a transition.
The reality is that as it rises exponentially, it also becomes exponentially difficult to increase it.
What we are seeing is the transition from Bi-planes to jets.
Once we hit 26nm en mass it will slow down, the reality is that this could be the start of the end for bitcoin, specifically because the distribution is being centralized into a small number of pools.
It matters not what the overall distribution of miners is, but rather the pool distribution.
It would only take a 'bent' or a 'couple of bent' pool operators to leverage a 51% attack.
The reality is that as it rises exponentially, it also becomes exponentially difficult to increase it.
What we are seeing is the transition from Bi-planes to jets.
Once we hit 26nm en mass it will slow down, the reality is that this could be the start of the end for bitcoin, specifically because the distribution is being centralized into a small number of pools.
It matters not what the overall distribution of miners is, but rather the pool distribution.
It would only take a 'bent' or a 'couple of bent' pool operators to leverage a 51% attack.
To do what? Destroy their business by destroying bitcoin? What would that achieve?
It is just a transition.
The reality is that as it rises exponentially, it also becomes exponentially difficult to increase it.
What we are seeing is the transition from Bi-planes to jets.
Once we hit 26nm en mass it will slow down, the reality is that this could be the start of the end for bitcoin, specifically because the distribution is being centralized into a small number of pools.
It matters not what the overall distribution of miners is, but rather the pool distribution.
It would only take a 'bent' or a 'couple of bent' pool operators to leverage a 51% attack.
The reality is that as it rises exponentially, it also becomes exponentially difficult to increase it.
What we are seeing is the transition from Bi-planes to jets.
Once we hit 26nm en mass it will slow down, the reality is that this could be the start of the end for bitcoin, specifically because the distribution is being centralized into a small number of pools.
It matters not what the overall distribution of miners is, but rather the pool distribution.
It would only take a 'bent' or a 'couple of bent' pool operators to leverage a 51% attack.
Jump to: