Then you are not disagreeing with me
You are disagreeing with your own point. I said that they wouldn't pump Bitcoin beyond December highs so that folks who had bought at those highs or close to them wouldn't be able to profit at the expense of Wall Street. Then you said that I must have been kidding if I hadn't expected these dudes to "enter the market when BTC went to its all time high". Now you start to repeat my own words, basically ditching your own position. Obviously, that won't work out and I won't let you get away with that either. So you wanted to talk about who was kidding? You have the opportunity, go ahead
No I disagreed with you when you said that you didnt think the Wall Street pigs didnt have any involvement in the surge of BTC to all time highs. Of course they did, they always do. But I agree with you that they also have a hand in making things crash. Look at the Dow Jones. They make money when its going up and also when its going down lol.
And where exactly did I say that?
All I said that they might have had the hand in the current "fallout" and that they definitely weren't pumping Bitcoin at its December highs. Otherwise, the price would be a lot higher.
Yeah I agree that they have had direct involvement in the "current fallout". They must be having fun shorting the BTC futures market now while suppressing the price at the same time.
The part I disagreed with is the when you said they werent pumping BTC going to the all time highs. Im not saying you are wrong, Im saying that its possible that Wall Street were the people responsible of the December highs.
You know they are capable.