Pages:
Author

Topic: How many crypto exchanges are really required? (Read 1129 times)

hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 501
2local[IEO] - https://2local.io/
I think it is necessary to register the exchange and sell the altcoins in time. Because the market conditions are not good, many tokens will be sold on the exchanges, causing prices to fall.
full member
Activity: 1750
Merit: 118
At present, there are many projects on the exchange, but most of the projects are unlikely to be successful, because the competition is fierce and there is not a certain number of user groups. This exchange will eventually fail.

your talking to ieo's  or the coins listed on the exchange   ?  if you say projects on the exchange that mainly refers to ieo's   . ieo's are new and the competition is still slim so the chance for the projects are likely to be succeed   .  but if you are dealing about the coins , yes the competition with them is big   . only few coins can survived and mainly those coins can survived are from the big exchanges   .  many exchanges are required because many coins are being created everyday  .
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 501
2local[IEO] - https://2local.io/
At present, there are many projects on the exchange, but most of the projects are unlikely to be successful, because the competition is fierce and there is not a certain number of user groups. This exchange will eventually fail.
sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 255
HALA MADRID
More exchanges will always improve the standards of their services and cryptocurrency will get more exposure in the market. Less exchange will get less exposure and it is impossible to predict the volumes, in order to get more exposure for crypto we need competition for exchanges and this will help the exchanges to improve their standards.
Until now I did not think the number of trade exchanges will make traders confused. More and more exchanges that can be used by traders in trading will open up opportunities to arbitrate with the same token or coin. Each exchange will have advantages and disadvantages and hope will always trade assets on a safe exchange.
member
Activity: 278
Merit: 10
I'm ok with many exchanges, I don't want a few exchanges getting the monopoly of the market, if this happens, we have no control on decentralization and price will have an impact since these few exchanges can charge a very high fee, because of lack of options, we need more exchanges and each one independent of the other exchanges, the stronger the competition, the better for the community to benefit.
I agree, it will also prevent a big manipulation of the markets and having many exchangez will force them to improve their services and platform. Having few exchangers around will make them comfortable and wont keep on improving.

More exchanges will always improve the standards of their services and cryptocurrency will get more exposure in the market. Less exchange will get less exposure and it is impossible to predict the volumes, in order to get more exposure for crypto we need competition for exchanges and this will help the exchanges to improve their standards.
legendary
Activity: 2996
Merit: 1054
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I'm ok with many exchanges, I don't want a few exchanges getting the monopoly of the market, if this happens, we have no control on decentralization and price will have an impact since these few exchanges can charge a very high fee, because of lack of options, we need more exchanges and each one independent of the other exchanges, the stronger the competition, the better for the community to benefit.
I agree, it will also prevent a big manipulation of the markets and having many exchanges will force them to improve their services and platform. Having few exchangers around will make them comfortable and wont keep on improving.
Having more competitions will bring something new to exchange owners to offer something that will be benefiting to the traders and investors.
With those new exchange that trying to gained reputations even offering much lesser fee or bonuses if they survived and get the trust from traders
it will force those big and existing exchanges to improve and to keep things favorable to their members/traders.

Aside from monopoly, competitions also bringing new sets of ideas for owners to create more features around their business.
sr. member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 253
I'm ok with many exchanges, I don't want a few exchanges getting the monopoly of the market, if this happens, we have no control on decentralization and price will have an impact since these few exchanges can charge a very high fee, because of lack of options, we need more exchanges and each one independent of the other exchanges, the stronger the competition, the better for the community to benefit.
I agree, it will also prevent a big manipulation of the markets and having many exchangez will force them to improve their services and platform. Having few exchangers around will make them comfortable and wont keep on improving.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1253
So anyway, I applied as a merit source :)
And this is why I don't trust in the least now people who needs funds to develop something. Satoshi didn't need funds, why should others? Right?
Some fellow "venture capitalists" would disagree with you. Cheesy But we both know that they are nothing but newbie entrants with a 100$ in their pocket ready to gamble on every new startup that comes up. It makes them feel good and allow them to get that investment banker feel, you know? Roll Eyes

Point is that people will keep on attempting to turn 10 into 1000 and doing so they will dig up new and new shitcoins to get their money multiplied at the expense of their investors. So when they need to get listed they need an exchange, and so new ones come up. You can relate this to a demand supply balance. But how many of them are going to last is another question.
sr. member
Activity: 2030
Merit: 269
Now a days, I have observed that out of ten projects three or four are of new exchanges. At the moment there are so many exchanges available for cryptocurrencies. When we invest in other projects and its token got listed in one of the new exchange, we have to create account with that exchange to trade those tokens.
Do you really think that there is a need of so many exchanges? isn't it very complicated and lengthy to keep accounts in many exchanges?
Please share your views.
  

I'm ok with many exchanges, I don't want a few exchanges getting the monopoly of the market, if this happens, we have no control on decentralization and price will have an impact since these few exchanges can charge a very high fee, because of lack of options, we need more exchanges and each one independent of the other exchanges, the stronger the competition, the better for the community to benefit.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1226
Livecasino, 20% cashback, no fuss payouts.
You have the wrong perception when it comes to this matter because it isn't really that necessary to have big accumulated amount of funds.
Success vary on the team itself if they would push through on making the platform stable and do its job into the public.The only wrong thing here
is that project owners aren't really that serious enough to that extent where they do only just target out on collecting their investors money and ran it off.

Very few things in crypto actually relies on a lot of funds unless you intend to pay for results (that is, have a lot of paid marketing and PR options like paid ads, sponsored articles etc).

And this is why I don't trust in the least now people who needs funds to develop something. Satoshi didn't need funds, why should others? Right?
hero member
Activity: 2968
Merit: 687
Such a great number of exchanges irritates me actually. There was a time when every second project and bounty I participated was about creating their own new exchange. And of course majority of them completely failed. Enough.

Lol, I remember that. I never joined those campaigns because it was always bullshit. An exchange is not an easy thing to deliver on. You need to many funds. There is already so much competition as well.
Some of ICO that created in my country did that, claimed to be good exchanges and then die left investor with their tokens. I think really need a lot of research and money to create exchange, maybe higher target for ICO so they have enough money to make it stable.
You have the wrong perception when it comes to this matter because it isn't really that necessary to have big accumulated amount of funds.
Success vary on the team itself if they would push through on making the platform stable and do its job into the public.The only wrong thing here
is that project owners aren't really that serious enough to that extent where they do only just target out on collecting their investors money and ran it off.
sr. member
Activity: 903
Merit: 391
Such a great number of exchanges irritates me actually. There was a time when every second project and bounty I participated was about creating their own new exchange. And of course majority of them completely failed. Enough.

Lol, I remember that. I never joined those campaigns because it was always bullshit. An exchange is not an easy thing to deliver on. You need to many funds. There is already so much competition as well.
Some of ICO that created in my country did that, claimed to be good exchanges and then die left investor with their tokens. I think really need a lot of research and money to create exchange, maybe higher target for ICO so they have enough money to make it stable.
sr. member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 253
Undeads.com - P2E Runner Game
In my opinion, only 1 exchange is quite like binance, but a lot of developers who want to develop a market exchange project in order to compete.
Many features and innovative that are made in order to compete with other exchange. Indeed it makes it very complicated to keep assets on many exchange exchanges.
If I had many of his exchange is not a problem because only used to sell such a token and the asset is moved to major exchange like binance.
sr. member
Activity: 812
Merit: 253
●Social Crypto Trading●
Such a great number of exchanges irritates me actually. There was a time when every second project and bounty I participated was about creating their own new exchange. And of course majority of them completely failed. Enough.

Lol, I remember that. I never joined those campaigns because it was always bullshit. An exchange is not an easy thing to deliver on. You need to many funds. There is already so much competition as well.

Now a days, I have observed that out of ten projects three or four are of new exchanges. At the moment there are so many exchanges available for cryptocurrencies. When we invest in other projects and its token got listed in one of the new exchange, we have to create account with that exchange to trade those tokens.
Do you really think that there is a need of so many exchanges? isn't it very complicated and lengthy to keep accounts in many exchanges?
Please share your views.
 

You are talking about startups that offer the exchange as a product. Yes, you are right because we noticed lastly that so many ICOs and IEOs projects want to initiate new crypto exchanges with some "unique" features, according to them. So many developers want just to imitate Binance and DEX and they have the dream to reach their success.

Product or service, yes. Instead of just people dreaming followed by foolish investors with $$ in their eyes.
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1001
Now a days, I have observed that out of ten projects three or four are of new exchanges. At the moment there are so many exchanges available for cryptocurrencies. When we invest in other projects and its token got listed in one of the new exchange, we have to create account with that exchange to trade those tokens.
Do you really think that there is a need of so many exchanges? isn't it very complicated and lengthy to keep accounts in many exchanges?
Please share your views.
  

You are talking about startups that offer the exchange as a product. Yes, you are right because we noticed lastly that so many ICOs and IEOs projects want to initiate new crypto exchanges with some "unique" features, according to them. So many developers want just to imitate Binance and DEX and they have the dream to reach their success.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1253
So anyway, I applied as a merit source :)
No more than two. Binance and one that you use for exchange for fiat
There are a lot of older exchanges which are trusted and even if they have forced KYC on many users still they have a large userbase. What you say is strange because since more than one of them already exist, how can you stop them from existing? People have been using Poloniex, Bitfinex Kraken and also P2P exchanges. Whether Binance itself is trying to get a monopoly is questionable but that is not the topic of discussion here.

Maybe you are using two exchanges for your deals but not everyone is having the same circumstances as you are.
hero member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 535
Now a days, I have observed that out of ten projects three or four are of new exchanges. At the moment there are so many exchanges available for cryptocurrencies. When we invest in other projects and its token got listed in one of the new exchange, we have to create account with that exchange to trade those tokens.
Do you really think that there is a need of so many exchanges? isn't it very complicated and lengthy to keep accounts in many exchanges?
Please share your views.
  

So far as exchange platforms serve as the crypto version of banks and making it possible for people to easily buy and own cryptocurrencies, I do not have any problem regarding the number of exchange platforms being created. But the only problem I  have with new exchange platforms is them creating their own crypto coins. To me, it is not relevant for an exchange platform to create its own coin. Most of these coins are just worthless coins flooding the crypto market with no specific aims that will have an impact on the crypto space.
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 509
Now a days, I have observed that out of ten projects three or four are of new exchanges. At the moment there are so many exchanges available for cryptocurrencies. When we invest in other projects and its token got listed in one of the new exchange, we have to create account with that exchange to trade those tokens.
Do you really think that there is a need of so many exchanges? isn't it very complicated and lengthy to keep accounts in many exchanges?
Please share your views.
  
If the exchange is not a scam, how will it affect us badly? On the contrary, it means more choices when we find that we want more exchange. So, it becomes easier to find an appropriate exchange that you can trade. You no longer depend on the exchange, but exchanges make all sorts of competitions to get you. Also, this place is for those who are strong, if the new is already stronger than the old, the old will gradually be destroyed.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1168
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I don't even understand what the op means by "Required"...By whom? I don't see any harm even if there were thousands of exchanges. It doesn't mean you have to use them. If there's market for so them, why not create so many, the ones that people are not using will die out eventually. I am using only 5 exchanges for different things and occasionally one random exchange if the coin i am looking for is only in there. More exchanges just creates competition and the competition make better exchanges.
member
Activity: 700
Merit: 10
Now a days, I have observed that out of ten projects three or four are of new exchanges. At the moment there are so many exchanges available for cryptocurrencies. When we invest in other projects and its token got listed in one of the new exchange, we have to create account with that exchange to trade those tokens.
Do you really think that there is a need of so many exchanges? isn't it very complicated and lengthy to keep accounts in many exchanges?
Please share your views.
  

New exchangers continue to emerge due to the large number of tokens that are not accommodated in established exchangers. The amount of listing fees in large exchangers provides an opportunity for new exchangers to appear with smaller listing fees and I think it's only natural. New exchangers will continue to emerge as long as new projects continue to emerge because requests for listings will continue
Pages:
Jump to: