Topic: How many people will die because of the Bitshares Corporate Fascists/Communists? (Read 4449 times)
September 22, 2015, 12:33:45 AM
im going to be sucint about my opinion on terror and nervos people doing closed eyes ideas about the world usa japan europe open tehier eyes into democracy and good republics its my opinion i have seen 2 bombs into japan they are not even democratic bombs turned us into digital over 70 years soo people stay behind into fascim terror or comunism terror and all thend to go to bad examples but people are people get nervos by not having money and not even mental health soo we need to see if masses relly need those extremes besides capital.
September 21, 2015, 11:57:38 PM
Wealth redistribution does not equate to communism. That is nonsensical and a huge jump. Communism is wealth redistribution, but wealth redistribution is not necessarily communism. Far from it.
Wealth redistribution from the masses to the elite is the main objective of both Communism and Corporate Fascism.
"History doesn't lie." Sure, if you have the right history. hah!
Are you denying the holocausts perpetrated by the Communists?
I like the fact that you use corporate fascist as a insult alongside communism. 2 things that are almost polar opposites, except you think they are both equally offensive.
Wrong. They are in fact the exact same thing.
You obviously buy hook, line and sinker the very superficial and cursory definitions provided to the masses regarding the terms "corporate fascism" and "communism" without actually deducing for yourself the result of both systems which is the merger of both state and capitalist bureaucracy.
As it has been said of the communist revolution:
"It is only the old feudal large landed property which exists no longer. Conditions in Russia were ripe for its abolition but they were not ripe for the abolition of capitalism. Capitalism is now once again celebrating a resurrection, but in forms that are more oppressive and harrowing for the proletariat than of old. Instead of assuming higher industrialised forms, private capitalism has assumed the most wretched and shabby forms of black marketeering and money speculation. Industrial capitalism has developed to become state capitalism. Formerly state officials and officials from private capital were critical, often very hostile towards each other. Consequently the working man found that his advantage lay with one or the other in turn. Today the state bureaucracy and capitalist bureaucracy are merged into one—that is the upshot of the great socialist revolution brought about by the Bolsheviks. It constitutes the most oppressive of all despotisms that Russia has ever had to suffer."
So, now you see that there is no difference between corporations controlling the state, "corporate fascism", or the state controlling corporations, "communism". They are but one and the same only differentiated by the means to the same end. I'm sorry to be the one to break it to you and anyone else that believes the two systems are different, but you've been duped.
As it has been said of the communist revolution:
"It is only the old feudal large landed property which exists no longer. Conditions in Russia were ripe for its abolition but they were not ripe for the abolition of capitalism. Capitalism is now once again celebrating a resurrection, but in forms that are more oppressive and harrowing for the proletariat than of old. Instead of assuming higher industrialised forms, private capitalism has assumed the most wretched and shabby forms of black marketeering and money speculation. Industrial capitalism has developed to become state capitalism. Formerly state officials and officials from private capital were critical, often very hostile towards each other. Consequently the working man found that his advantage lay with one or the other in turn. Today the state bureaucracy and capitalist bureaucracy are merged into one—that is the upshot of the great socialist revolution brought about by the Bolsheviks. It constitutes the most oppressive of all despotisms that Russia has ever had to suffer."
So, now you see that there is no difference between corporations controlling the state, "corporate fascism", or the state controlling corporations, "communism". They are but one and the same only differentiated by the means to the same end. I'm sorry to be the one to break it to you and anyone else that believes the two systems are different, but you've been duped.
Wealth redistribution in some form is the goal of any economic system if I understand your logic. That doesn't make them all the same thing. There are plenty of people in this world at the bottom who support communism. Corporate Facism?
Denying the holocausts? Your logic is profoundly bad or you are schizophrenic. Either way it puts you in a category of person I do not wish to debate with.
The redistribution of wealth from the poor to the elite is the main objective of both communism and corporate fascism. Both systems are the exact same thing. This is the big lie of communism. The only reason some of the impoverished of the world support communism is because they are uneducated and manipulated into believing that wealth redistribution in communism is from the top down when in reality it is the exact opposite. Communism is in fact a monopolists paradise. You can have no greater monopoly than that which results from the merger of state and capitalist bureaucracy.
September 21, 2015, 03:26:00 PM
Wealth redistribution does not equate to communism. That is nonsensical and a huge jump. Communism is wealth redistribution, but wealth redistribution is not necessarily communism. Far from it.
Wealth redistribution from the masses to the elite is the main objective of both Communism and Corporate Fascism.
"History doesn't lie." Sure, if you have the right history. hah!
Are you denying the holocausts perpetrated by the Communists?
I like the fact that you use corporate fascist as a insult alongside communism. 2 things that are almost polar opposites, except you think they are both equally offensive.
Wrong. They are in fact the exact same thing.
You obviously buy hook, line and sinker the very superficial and cursory definitions provided to the masses regarding the terms "corporate fascism" and "communism" without actually deducing for yourself the result of both systems which is the merger of both state and capitalist bureaucracy.
As it has been said of the communist revolution:
"It is only the old feudal large landed property which exists no longer. Conditions in Russia were ripe for its abolition but they were not ripe for the abolition of capitalism. Capitalism is now once again celebrating a resurrection, but in forms that are more oppressive and harrowing for the proletariat than of old. Instead of assuming higher industrialised forms, private capitalism has assumed the most wretched and shabby forms of black marketeering and money speculation. Industrial capitalism has developed to become state capitalism. Formerly state officials and officials from private capital were critical, often very hostile towards each other. Consequently the working man found that his advantage lay with one or the other in turn. Today the state bureaucracy and capitalist bureaucracy are merged into one—that is the upshot of the great socialist revolution brought about by the Bolsheviks. It constitutes the most oppressive of all despotisms that Russia has ever had to suffer."
So, now you see that there is no difference between corporations controlling the state, "corporate fascism", or the state controlling corporations, "communism". They are but one and the same only differentiated by the means to the same end. I'm sorry to be the one to break it to you and anyone else that believes the two systems are different, but you've been duped.
As it has been said of the communist revolution:
"It is only the old feudal large landed property which exists no longer. Conditions in Russia were ripe for its abolition but they were not ripe for the abolition of capitalism. Capitalism is now once again celebrating a resurrection, but in forms that are more oppressive and harrowing for the proletariat than of old. Instead of assuming higher industrialised forms, private capitalism has assumed the most wretched and shabby forms of black marketeering and money speculation. Industrial capitalism has developed to become state capitalism. Formerly state officials and officials from private capital were critical, often very hostile towards each other. Consequently the working man found that his advantage lay with one or the other in turn. Today the state bureaucracy and capitalist bureaucracy are merged into one—that is the upshot of the great socialist revolution brought about by the Bolsheviks. It constitutes the most oppressive of all despotisms that Russia has ever had to suffer."
So, now you see that there is no difference between corporations controlling the state, "corporate fascism", or the state controlling corporations, "communism". They are but one and the same only differentiated by the means to the same end. I'm sorry to be the one to break it to you and anyone else that believes the two systems are different, but you've been duped.
Wealth redistribution in some form is the goal of any economic system if I understand your logic. That doesn't make them all the same thing. There are plenty of people in this world at the bottom who support communism. Corporate Facism?
Denying the holocausts? Your logic is profoundly bad or you are schizophrenic. Either way it puts you in a category of person I do not wish to debate with.
September 21, 2015, 01:33:24 PM
What is the big deal for Bitshares?
It is over 3k satoshi now when it was less than 2k satoshi around one month ago.
It is over 3k satoshi now when it was less than 2k satoshi around one month ago.
It's a chicom gov pump to attempt to get more unwitting individuals to hand their money over to the Larimer gang.
September 21, 2015, 09:37:12 AM
What is the big deal for Bitshares?
It is over 3k satoshi now when it was less than 2k satoshi around one month ago.
It is over 3k satoshi now when it was less than 2k satoshi around one month ago.
September 21, 2015, 12:17:45 AM
My guess is the twins are twinks being bankrolled by Putin
No, it's the chicoms.
September 20, 2015, 08:18:34 PM
I see this thread has become the troll haven for BTS haters...but the price just keeps going up anyway. Hmm...
September 20, 2015, 06:54:56 PM
question..are brownie points for taking it in the brown eye from the dick tator?
September 20, 2015, 06:51:03 PM
My guess is the twins are twinks being bankrolled by Putin
September 20, 2015, 03:52:00 PM
Wealth redistribution does not equate to communism. That is nonsensical and a huge jump. Communism is wealth redistribution, but wealth redistribution is not necessarily communism. Far from it.
Wealth redistribution from the masses to the elite is the main objective of both Communism and Corporate Fascism.
"History doesn't lie." Sure, if you have the right history. hah!
Are you denying the holocausts perpetrated by the Communists?
I like the fact that you use corporate fascist as a insult alongside communism. 2 things that are almost polar opposites, except you think they are both equally offensive.
Wrong. They are in fact the exact same thing.
You obviously buy hook, line and sinker the very superficial and cursory definitions provided to the masses regarding the terms "corporate fascism" and "communism" without actually deducing for yourself the result of both systems which is the merger of both state and capitalist bureaucracy.
As it has been said of the communist revolution:
"It is only the old feudal large landed property which exists no longer. Conditions in Russia were ripe for its abolition but they were not ripe for the abolition of capitalism. Capitalism is now once again celebrating a resurrection, but in forms that are more oppressive and harrowing for the proletariat than of old. Instead of assuming higher industrialised forms, private capitalism has assumed the most wretched and shabby forms of black marketeering and money speculation. Industrial capitalism has developed to become state capitalism. Formerly state officials and officials from private capital were critical, often very hostile towards each other. Consequently the working man found that his advantage lay with one or the other in turn. Today the state bureaucracy and capitalist bureaucracy are merged into one—that is the upshot of the great socialist revolution brought about by the Bolsheviks. It constitutes the most oppressive of all despotisms that Russia has ever had to suffer."
So, now you see that there is no difference between corporations controlling the state, "corporate fascism", or the state controlling corporations, "communism". They are but one and the same only differentiated by the means to the same end. I'm sorry to be the one to break it to you and anyone else that believes the two systems are different, but you've been duped.
As it has been said of the communist revolution:
"It is only the old feudal large landed property which exists no longer. Conditions in Russia were ripe for its abolition but they were not ripe for the abolition of capitalism. Capitalism is now once again celebrating a resurrection, but in forms that are more oppressive and harrowing for the proletariat than of old. Instead of assuming higher industrialised forms, private capitalism has assumed the most wretched and shabby forms of black marketeering and money speculation. Industrial capitalism has developed to become state capitalism. Formerly state officials and officials from private capital were critical, often very hostile towards each other. Consequently the working man found that his advantage lay with one or the other in turn. Today the state bureaucracy and capitalist bureaucracy are merged into one—that is the upshot of the great socialist revolution brought about by the Bolsheviks. It constitutes the most oppressive of all despotisms that Russia has ever had to suffer."
So, now you see that there is no difference between corporations controlling the state, "corporate fascism", or the state controlling corporations, "communism". They are but one and the same only differentiated by the means to the same end. I'm sorry to be the one to break it to you and anyone else that believes the two systems are different, but you've been duped.
September 20, 2015, 12:02:42 PM
I like the fact that you use corporate fascist as a insult alongside communism. 2 things that are almost polar opposites, except you think they are both equally offensive.
From certain points of view, they are equally offensive.
September 20, 2015, 11:29:46 AM
September 20, 2015, 04:50:38 AM
Lets start with this thread. Why do you think Bitshares will kill a minimum of 2 million people?
Mass Killings Under Communist Regimes
History doesn't lie.
"Goes against everything crypto represents" - Explain to us what "crypto represents". It is an area of math/technology that doesn't really represent anything.
You're wrong. It represents this:
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
How are they communists again?
Communist Bitshares Wealth Redistribution IS THEFT!
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,17354.0.html
I would moderate my thread too.
That's because you're a Communist/Corporate Fascist too.
Do you blame Stan? Look at this thread. You are saying you are a legitimate person. Yet this whole thread is over your belief that Bitshares will kill 2 million people MINIMUM. I don't know even know where to start....
Yes, I blame Chairman Stanlin for destroying the original intent of crypto with his schemes.
"Longest running scam" ... get some help.
I'm not the only one that believes this.
In the beginning it was all about open source and the social consensus, at least that was what they promoted.
Then they made money via Protoshares, Bitcoin donations and Bitshares and now it comes to light that all this was to develop their own proprietary software. Bitshares has to be longest on-going scam in the cryptocurrency realm.
While this is without a doubt unethical and of dubious legal nature, I say this is outright fraud. Greed really brings out the most disgusting side in people.
Then they made money via Protoshares, Bitcoin donations and Bitshares and now it comes to light that all this was to develop their own proprietary software. Bitshares has to be longest on-going scam in the cryptocurrency realm.
While this is without a doubt unethical and of dubious legal nature, I say this is outright fraud. Greed really brings out the most disgusting side in people.
Wealth redistribution does not equate to communism. That is nonsensical and a huge jump. Communism is wealth redistribution, but wealth redistribution is not necessarily communism. Far from it.
"History doesn't lie." Sure, if you have the right history. hah!
I agree with the brownie points. I agree there were mistakes made in the Bitshares ecosystem. Daniel Larimer is not good with words. It has bit them in the ass more than once. They are trying their best to keep the development going. It is hard to do when all the developers could jump ship and immediately find better paying employment elsewhere. This doesn't scream to me scam by any stretch. It has been one of the more successful altcoins in altcoin history. That is the type of history that doesn't lie.
I like the fact that you use corporate fascist as a insult alongside communism. 2 things that are almost polar opposites, except you think they are both equally offensive.
September 20, 2015, 04:36:42 AM
Lets start with this thread. Why do you think Bitshares will kill a minimum of 2 million people?
Mass Killings Under Communist Regimes
History doesn't lie.
"Goes against everything crypto represents" - Explain to us what "crypto represents". It is an area of math/technology that doesn't really represent anything.
You're wrong. It represents this:
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
How are they communists again?
Communist Bitshares Wealth Redistribution IS THEFT!
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,17354.0.html
I would moderate my thread too.
That's because you're a Communist/Corporate Fascist too.
Do you blame Stan? Look at this thread. You are saying you are a legitimate person. Yet this whole thread is over your belief that Bitshares will kill 2 million people MINIMUM. I don't know even know where to start....
Yes, I blame Chairman Stanlin for destroying the original intent of crypto with his schemes.
"Longest running scam" ... get some help.
I'm not the only one that believes this.
In the beginning it was all about open source and the social consensus, at least that was what they promoted.
Then they made money via Protoshares, Bitcoin donations and Bitshares and now it comes to light that all this was to develop their own proprietary software. Bitshares has to be longest on-going scam in the cryptocurrency realm.
While this is without a doubt unethical and of dubious legal nature, I say this is outright fraud. Greed really brings out the most disgusting side in people.
Then they made money via Protoshares, Bitcoin donations and Bitshares and now it comes to light that all this was to develop their own proprietary software. Bitshares has to be longest on-going scam in the cryptocurrency realm.
While this is without a doubt unethical and of dubious legal nature, I say this is outright fraud. Greed really brings out the most disgusting side in people.
September 20, 2015, 04:19:39 AM
Not sure why you are so set about it being a scam... unless........
you are horribly threatened
you are horribly threatened
Because it's the longest running scam in the history of crypto and goes against everything that crypto represents. I certainly welcome all the supporters of Bitshares to post in this thread and point out where they believe I'm wrong. I can back up all my statements with quotes and proof and enjoy a good debate on the matter. The fact is that I leave ALL my threads open and unmoderated because I believe in freedom of speech and don't feel "threatened" one bit. On the other hand, Chairman Stanlin Larimer despises freedom of speech because he knows the truth will lower the amount of innocent victims he can con into handing over their money and therefore, he moderates ALL his threads. He is the one who feels "horribly threatened".
Lets start with this thread. Why do you think Bitshares will kill a minimum of 2 million people?
"Goes against everything crypto represents" - Explain to us what "crypto represents". It is an area of math/technology that doesn't really represent anything.
How are they communists again?
I would moderate my thread too. Do you blame Stan? Look at this thread. You are saying you are a legitimate person. Yet this whole thread is over your belief that Bitshares will kill 2 million people MINIMUM. I don't know even know where to start....
"Longest running scam" ... get some help.
September 20, 2015, 04:17:07 AM
Are you saying that "the longest scam in history" can't be run by "Corporate Fascists/Communists"?
If it's "the longest scam in history" it's doesn't matter how it's runs.
September 20, 2015, 04:12:05 AM
Not sure why you are so set about it being a scam... unless........
you are horribly threatened
you are horribly threatened
Because it's the longest running scam in the history of crypto and goes against everything that crypto represents. I certainly welcome all the supporters of Bitshares to post in this thread and point out where they believe I'm wrong. I can back up all my statements with quotes and proof and enjoy a good debate on the matter. The fact is that I leave ALL my threads open and unmoderated because I believe in freedom of speech and don't feel "threatened" one bit. On the other hand, Chairman Stanlin Larimer despises freedom of speech because he knows the truth will lower the amount of innocent victims he can con into handing over their money and therefore, he moderates ALL his threads. He is the one who feels "horribly threatened".
How you make "Corporate Fascists/Communists" equal "longest running scam in the history of crypto"?
You make this thread complete unreadable, you start from one topic them move to another. If you want peoples to understand you, make your statement clear if no - continue to spread your bla bla bla.
Are you saying that "the longest scam in history" can't be run by "Corporate Fascists/Communists"?
If it's "the longest scam in history" it's doesn't matter how it's runs.
September 20, 2015, 04:09:08 AM
Not sure why you are so set about it being a scam... unless........
you are horribly threatened
you are horribly threatened
Because it's the longest running scam in the history of crypto and goes against everything that crypto represents. I certainly welcome all the supporters of Bitshares to post in this thread and point out where they believe I'm wrong. I can back up all my statements with quotes and proof and enjoy a good debate on the matter. The fact is that I leave ALL my threads open and unmoderated because I believe in freedom of speech and don't feel "threatened" one bit. On the other hand, Chairman Stanlin Larimer despises freedom of speech because he knows the truth will lower the amount of innocent victims he can con into handing over their money and therefore, he moderates ALL his threads. He is the one who feels "horribly threatened".
How you make "Corporate Fascists/Communists" equal "longest running scam in the history of crypto"?
You make this thread complete unreadable, you start from one topic them move to another. If you want peoples to understand you, make your statement clear if no - continue to spread your bla bla bla.
Are you saying that "the longest scam in history" can't be run by "Corporate Fascists/Communists"?
September 20, 2015, 03:57:17 AM
Not sure why you are so set about it being a scam... unless........
you are horribly threatened
you are horribly threatened
Because it's the longest running scam in the history of crypto and goes against everything that crypto represents. I certainly welcome all the supporters of Bitshares to post in this thread and point out where they believe I'm wrong. I can back up all my statements with quotes and proof and enjoy a good debate on the matter. The fact is that I leave ALL my threads open and unmoderated because I believe in freedom of speech and don't feel "threatened" one bit. On the other hand, Chairman Stanlin Larimer despises freedom of speech because he knows the truth will lower the amount of innocent victims he can con into handing over their money and therefore, he moderates ALL his threads. He is the one who feels "horribly threatened".
How you make "Corporate Fascists/Communists" equal "longest running scam in the history of crypto"?
You make this thread complete unreadable, you start from one topic them move to another. If you want peoples to understand you, make your statement clear if no - continue to spread your bla bla bla.
September 19, 2015, 11:21:47 PM
Not sure why you are so set about it being a scam... unless........
you are horribly threatened
you are horribly threatened
Because it's the longest running scam in the history of crypto and goes against everything that crypto represents. I certainly welcome all the supporters of Bitshares to post in this thread and point out where they believe I'm wrong. I can back up all my statements with quotes and proof and enjoy a good debate on the matter. The fact is that I leave ALL my threads open and unmoderated because I believe in freedom of speech and don't feel "threatened" one bit. On the other hand, Chairman Stanlin Larimer despises freedom of speech because he knows the truth will lower the amount of innocent victims he can con into handing over their money and therefore, he moderates ALL his threads. He is the one who feels "horribly threatened".
Jump to: