Topic: How the NSA caught Satoshi Nakamoto (Read 1348 times)
Satoshi might not be an AI, but an AI prophet! =o
I agree with only one sentence in the article
During the Internet Era this is sadly true
Quote
The moral of the story? You can’t hide on the internet anymore. Your sentence structure and word use is MORE unique than your own fingerprint. If an organization, like the NSA, wants to find you they will.
During the Internet Era this is sadly true
Many speculations now of who really is the man behind the pen name Satoshi Nakamoto but until now there's no clear answer of who is really that man, but for me who cares! the important is that we used and benefited his creation, and I think that one day in the future he showed-up.
Remaining anonymous was his choice and it is a great practice to go the extra lenght trying to know,who is. He came up with a good project and instead of behaving like the Einstein's of the past who wanted to carried for their achievements he laid low. Thumbs up C
This article seems a bit far fetched. Some random reporter has anonymous sources. Anyone can make a claim with anonymous sources.
Please, take the time to convince me. Please, I beg of you. Share your vast knowledge with us.
I doubt Satoshi is an AI. AIs aren't that fluent with speech and answering people's questions.
Dr. Craig Steven Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto.
"If you don’t believe me or don’t get it, I don’t have time to try to convince you, sorry."
"If you don’t believe me or don’t get it, I don’t have time to try to convince you, sorry."
Please, take the time to convince me. Please, I beg of you. Share your vast knowledge with us.
If that happens we will know the real man behind Satoshi Nakamoto, but what if hes only a AI? Could it be worth finding for or what if there groups behind it?
I doubt Satoshi is an AI. AIs aren't that fluent with speech and answering people's questions.
I am not sure this is an authentic way of finding someone or not but I found this interesting.
"By taking Satoshi’s texts and finding the 50 most common words, the NSA was able to break down his text into 5,000-word chunks and analyse each to find the frequency of those 50 words."
* How the NSA caught Satoshi Nakamoto.
I am very sceptical about this kind of research/investigation. What's your take on this? Do you think we can find out real Satoshi with such method?
"By taking Satoshi’s texts and finding the 50 most common words, the NSA was able to break down his text into 5,000-word chunks and analyse each to find the frequency of those 50 words."
* How the NSA caught Satoshi Nakamoto.
I am very sceptical about this kind of research/investigation. What's your take on this? Do you think we can find out real Satoshi with such method?
What I have read there is all about how someone is trying very hard to promote a model or technique on how to get someone and neither has he confirmed that Satoshi was found, or he has been identified what he tries to do is to also create fear that no one is safe on the internet which is true no one is doubting that. But at the same time, I expected more than what is being titled in the thread.
I think that Satoshi left at the perfect time if he was looking to stay anonymous, he might have been found if he was still kicking around but it is really hard to go back at this point and analyze his posts. Also word analysis is pretty stupid, it can be useful in certain situations but it cant hold up on its own as definitive proof. People raised in similar countries or areas use similar vocabulary.
It doesn't really matter who Nakamoto is, my question is why have his accounts been static for years? Why isn't he using his bitcoin? What would happen if tens of thousands of BTC suddenly started being spent?
Dr. Craig Steven Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto.
"If you don’t believe me or don’t get it, I don’t have time to try to convince you, sorry."
He was smart enough to invent Bitcoin but dumb enough to refuse providing a signed message with his early mined addresses? I'd advise you to be careful with double chick balls sucking of Dr. you might choke on his balls. lol"If you don’t believe me or don’t get it, I don’t have time to try to convince you, sorry."
Of course you don't have time because you are too busy with shilling for your boss emperor Wu, counting your free money and laughing at us while gang banging some under aged virgins. I'm mad because you guys didn't share a piece of the free large cake with me and other community members. double lol.
I'd advise you to stop listening to lying pieces of shit: https://www.scribd.com/doc/306521425/Appeal-to-Authority-a-Failure-of-Trust
Dr. Craig Steven Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto.
"If you don’t believe me or don’t get it, I don’t have time to try to convince you, sorry."
He was smart enough to invent Bitcoin but dumb enough to refuse providing a signed message with his early mined addresses? I'd advise you to be careful with double chick balls sucking of Dr. you might choke on his balls. lol"If you don’t believe me or don’t get it, I don’t have time to try to convince you, sorry."
Of course you don't have time because you are too busy with shilling for your boss emperor Wu, counting your free money and laughing at us while gang banging some under aged virgins. I'm mad because you guys didn't share a piece of the free large cake with me and other community members. double lol.
I'd advise you to stop listening to lying pieces of shit: https://www.scribd.com/doc/306521425/Appeal-to-Authority-a-Failure-of-Trust
If that happens we will know the real man behind Satoshi Nakamoto, but what if hes only a AI? Could it be worth finding for or what if there groups behind it?
If there are groups behind it then that means probably they only found one people from the group who used the satoshi nakamoto account. Even if he is only an AI, I still think it is still worth finding for because the identity of satoshi nakamoto has been a mystery for years now and many people wants to know his identity, even us who uses bitcoin in a daily basis.
If that happens we will know the real man behind Satoshi Nakamoto, but what if hes only a AI? Could it be worth finding for or what if there groups behind it?
Dr. Craig Steven Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto.
"If you don’t believe me or don’t get it, I don’t have time to try to convince you, sorry."
He was smart enough to invent Bitcoin but dumb enough to refuse providing a signed message with his early mined addresses? I'd advise you to be careful with double chick balls sucking of Dr. you might choke on his balls. lol"If you don’t believe me or don’t get it, I don’t have time to try to convince you, sorry."
Of course you don't have time because you are too busy with shilling for your boss emperor Wu, counting your free money and laughing at us while gang banging some under aged virgins. I'm mad because you guys didn't share a piece of the free large cake with me and other community members. double lol.
The author likes fiction and drama. It reads nice, but that's all it is. A good read with no evidence, full of speculations.
In fact, DHS will not publicly confirm that even THEY know the billionaire’s identity.
The effort took less than a month and resulted in positive match
These two sentences contradict each other. Did they find his identity or not? If they don't confirm it then how come you know they had a positive match? So much bullcrap!
In fact, DHS will not publicly confirm that even THEY know the billionaire’s identity.
The effort took less than a month and resulted in positive match
These two sentences contradict each other. Did they find his identity or not? If they don't confirm it then how come you know they had a positive match? So much bullcrap!
I am not sure this is an authentic way of finding someone or not but I found this interesting.
"By taking Satoshi’s texts and finding the 50 most common words, the NSA was able to break down his text into 5,000-word chunks and analyse each to find the frequency of those 50 words."
* How the NSA caught Satoshi Nakamoto.
I am very sceptical about this kind of research/investigation. What's your take on this? Do you think we can find out real Satoshi with such method?
"By taking Satoshi’s texts and finding the 50 most common words, the NSA was able to break down his text into 5,000-word chunks and analyse each to find the frequency of those 50 words."
* How the NSA caught Satoshi Nakamoto.
I am very sceptical about this kind of research/investigation. What's your take on this? Do you think we can find out real Satoshi with such method?
I am satoshi nakamoto
...
I am very sceptical about this kind of research/investigation. What's your take on this? Do you think we can find out real Satoshi with such method?
I am very sceptical about this kind of research/investigation. What's your take on this? Do you think we can find out real Satoshi with such method?
Yes, this is very possible to do today, but it assumes that Satoshi wasn't aware of
this capability prior and did not write in certain ways intentionally to throw off these
data analysis systems. He would have answered and talked in ways that is very
different than his actual way of speaking and using terms and phraseology. Satoshi
very likely wrote carefully and intentionally to attribute his style to well known public
people in the crypto and mathematics communities to throw off any future analysis,
even using individuals who were deceased at that point in time, for added confusion
and lulz, in the final results.
I was only able to understand few things mentioned in that article and that would be crazy if it is actually possible. How can you even find someone's identity with all that theory? Hopefully they don't grow grey hairs trying to find satoshi. Good luck to them. Who knows? Satoshi could even be a group of anonymous persons that came together under one name.
They don't want to take it that they have lost it and that this one is certainly beyond them, so anything to keep their hope alive seems okay. Soon they would run out of steam and then back at the garbage dump in search of next trash can to throw up in the air.
Dr. Craig Steven Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto.
"If you don’t believe me or don’t get it, I don’t have time to try to convince you, sorry."
"If you don’t believe me or don’t get it, I don’t have time to try to convince you, sorry."
I am not sure this is an authentic way of finding someone or not but I found this interesting.
"By taking Satoshi’s texts and finding the 50 most common words, the NSA was able to break down his text into 5,000-word chunks and analyse each to find the frequency of those 50 words."
* How the NSA caught Satoshi Nakamoto.
I am very sceptical about this kind of research/investigation. What's your take on this? Do you think we can find out real Satoshi with such method?
I don't think that using his texts is the best way to try and find out what the most common words he will use in a paper will be, but this is an extremely effective method for finding out who wrote something, if you have more texts of similar lengths to go off of. This would also need phrases, grammar and other indicators, however. Most common words it's the most effective indicator when used alone."By taking Satoshi’s texts and finding the 50 most common words, the NSA was able to break down his text into 5,000-word chunks and analyse each to find the frequency of those 50 words."
* How the NSA caught Satoshi Nakamoto.
I am very sceptical about this kind of research/investigation. What's your take on this? Do you think we can find out real Satoshi with such method?
If someone had enough time to sit down and look at all of my posts on here with the name removed, compared against every other post, they could probably be accurate in naming me >50% of the time.
I also don't think that it is possible to find out the real Satoshi by using this method. There is a possibility that hey have picked some words and their whole investigation is based on incorrect data. I am not sure, how accurate it could be ?
Jump to: