If you're referring to post accuracy for the purposes of gauging the value of an account [as in post quality], you determine it with the following ratio:
posts with at least 75 characters: total posts
For example: If you look at my posts, I would have a ratio of 8:8, so my post quality would be 100%.
If you're not referring to post accuracy as post quality, then I'm not sure how you'd gauge it.
posts with at least 75 characters: total posts
For example: If you look at my posts, I would have a ratio of 8:8, so my post quality would be 100%.
If you're not referring to post accuracy as post quality, then I'm not sure how you'd gauge it.
That makes sense, but I don't think.that the number of characters in a post would actually add quality to the post itself. I mean, I could go on blabbering and spitting random words here without actually being constructive.
I still dont get it. You mean like how the thread would be answered? or how the quoted part is answered? Or maybe how he creates a sentence through words?
Accuracy is how you perfect the words right?while quality is?
