Topic: How to choose bounty? - page 12. (Read 22784 times)
Well for me, i check the white paper of the project, i also check the team behind the project, what the project stands for,here i mean the use case, i also check the activeness of their social platform like telegram, twitter, facebook, reddit and instagram
Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
I pay more attention to the team and also their partners if their team is good and their partners are also from big companies, I think the project and web design also definitely good. 1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
Website design does not always give us the information on which you can determine how good the project is!
in fact, the appearance of a website that is too beautiful only attracts the interest of the visitors, which in the end the project ended in a scam.I saw a lot of projects with a delightful site design, this added credibility to the project, but in the end projects turned out to be a scam, as always.
Website design does not always give us the information on which you can determine how good the project is!
in fact, the appearance of a website that is too beautiful only attracts the interest of the visitors, which in the end the project ended in a scam.
Website design does not always give us the information on which you can determine how good the project is!
It seems to me that viewing information on sites like ICObench is no longer relevant, because sometimes it shows incorrect information!
As soon as you see that the project team has some ICO expert in evaluating new projects - you can be sure that this project will have the best ratings. If you have experiecne in bounties, then you have a list of points to pay your attention. For instance I select bounties with achieved soft cap, futhermore I prefer those bounties with fixed allocated pool. Look at temco and contents protocol, they guarantee certain pool of tokens
Knowing soft cap was reached is a first step for guaranteeing the end success because they have budget to pursue their project but not always the basis.. The budget is the key to start or pause the ICO. Community and ICO rating is necessary but unsuccessful soft cap could negatively affect the process.
All the criteria you write are important and must be noted. But these aren't enough. It is very important that the project has a product or software available. Also an important factor is the past experience of the team.
very often in the new projects, there is no working product, but this does not mean that the project is bad. therefore it is not the most important criterion 
in my opinion number 3, 5, 6 is very sufficient to determine whether project will be successful or not and besides that I'll add that the information of team and whitepaper is also very important
if for numbers 1 and 4 I disagree because now there is a false ICO rating and lots of bots on telegram
if for numbers 1 and 4 I disagree because now there is a false ICO rating and lots of bots on telegram
All the criteria you write are important and must be noted. But these aren't enough. It is very important that the project has a product or software available. Also an important factor is the past experience of the team.
It seems to me that viewing information on sites like ICObench is no longer relevant, because sometimes it shows incorrect information!
I do much research about the ICO that I will participate with my account to prevent from wasting my time and effort to the project. And I think is the best thing to choose the bounty campaign is reading their white papers and checking the background of their team and most of all is if their project has a promising goals that can really make sense in the future.
I chose bounty from my analysis, find information and read the whitepaper. But now it's very difficult to find a good bounty. Some of them failed and only reached the softcap.
Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
All what you have listed here are things you may put into consideration before joining any bounty campaign. But I will strongly advise you pay less attention to an ICO rating site.1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
I agree with paying less attention to ICO rating site. Some of which were paid by the project admins to give high ratings thus, it would satisfy investors to put their money to their project. I would also suggest to do some research to their platform and to their roadmap as if they could comply to it.
As for me, a good sighn KYC. Yes, a lot of bounty hunters afraid of it. But for me, it's meaning that I'll get more tokens. For example bounty From Huobi Russia. Good rewards, less people, more tokens, more profit)
If you have experiecne in bounties, then you have a list of points to pay your attention. For instance I select bounties with achieved soft cap, futhermore I prefer those bounties with fixed allocated pool. Look at temco and contents protocol, they guarantee certain pool of tokens
A good bounty manager offer you a good campaign.1st you see Bounty high views,than top rated bounty mananger,see their telegram channel,see total bounty allocation.Better you joined weekly payment bounty.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 2100
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
A good research on the project can give you a good bounty. Check the projects utility. Is it a good idea or not? Check the team. Are they using fake profile or not? If those are okay, check ICO rating site. Do not depend on ico rating site only because most of the time they are biased and take money to rate a good marks.
Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
That is good enough parameter to choose on a bounty campaign, What i think is when we are looking for bounty campaign, we also need to do some research just like when we are looking for a project to invest in an ICO, and ad more option for us, that is the allocation of the bounty program. 1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
Maybe you should add to the achievement of token sales because many projects fail because they cannot reach Soft Cap sales. And the list you made, in my opinion, is enough and very good. So this is very useful information.
Jump to: