Topic: How to close a crypto exchange easily (Read 348 times)

Centralized exchangers have no future due to the many risks of working for them. You need to sell assets because prices are falling and the exchange is blocking your funds and asking you to submit tax returns.
If you have transferred your data on the Internet at least once, more than one service will not delete them from there.No matter how the exchanges resist, they will transfer all the trading data of clients over the past 6 years to the US tax and other services.

Well if that the case yes, we cannot trust  any exchange although they say in their term of use that they will not abuse or sell our data bla bla bla hehehehe

and I hear about an app that said can remove our personal information but I dont think really know how the app works https://incogni.com/ here the website if you want to visit

I think this is true before the Cambridge Analytica scandal, in which Facebook user data was stolen by a third party. For those who forgot this issue, here is a link to remind them https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election

Many governments began to be strict in requesting personal data from the end of that year until the end of 2019, and if you notice the date of the article, it is in the year 2019, and therefore the laws of dealing with data and sharing it with third parties have become more serious during recent years than previous years.

An example of this is The Information Technology Act, 2000 (I.T. Act) (we are here talking about Asia, not Europe)

Theoretically, platforms can abuse customer data, but they will claim that a third party has hacked into servers, an argument that takes years in court to refute.

This case will be long.
If you are talking about the security of your personal data, then I do not trust exchanges.
Coinbase Executive: Our Client Data Was Sold By Third-Party Providers
https://cryptopotato.com/coinbase-executive-our-client-data-was-sold-by-third-party-providers/

Although in my country, personal data is sold like pies on the market, and it is impossible to fight against it.

It has a high chance to happen. That being said, with their capital and money, I doubt Binance will be in trouble unless something terrible happened. They can pay the fine and then stop serving US customers, although I doubt they'd do that without any reluctance. I bet they'd reverse that decision if the opportunity arise as quickly as possible.
Ideally, that should be the case, but I wouldn't be surprised if they kept some data and sell or send them to some agencies or other companies. They'd not do it publicly of course, why would they do that if they can get in trouble later? If you don't want to risk it, the only choice is to never use them in the first place. CMIIW.

One of the major responsibilities of the SEC is to protect the American investment sector against fraud or fraudulent business. But SEC is not proactive because they are always alleging that some exchanges operate without a license after these firms have operated for many years. Beaxy has been operating as an unregistered exchange and broker for many years and SEC had to wait until the customers have lost their funds before they react. SEC should monitor its crypto space and sanction unregistered firms instead of waiting until they mismanaged people's hard-earned money.

Well one by one exchanges that have licensed in the US start to close their business, I think the regulation there was pretty tight and SEC seems bombarded the US crypto world. are the Binance could be the next??

back to the tittle of the topic Im also curios how to close a crypto account I think when the company start to fall apart or bankrupt they should noot to keep the user data right?

In Southeast Asia at least, this doesn't seem to be the case. Most governments still do not allow crypto usage for payments, but people can trade just fine. Exchanges are being regulated heavily, and oversea exchange that does not have an office in the country seems to be blocked through DNS blocking, etc. Fortunately, they don't block and fine every exchange as long as they follow the latest rules. At least that's what happens in my country. I believe this will be the status quo for a while.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-derivatives-regulator-says-binance-175042712.html
"“These are not unsophisticated individuals,” CFTC Chairman Rostin Behnam said Thursday at an event hosted by Princeton University. “They are starting large companies and offering futures contracts and derivatives to US customers.”

In one of the most significant moves by Washington to crack down on a crypto firm, the CFTC last month accused Binance of “sham” compliance with US derivatives regulations, including failing to keep Americans off its exchange as promised and not registering with the regulator. Binance, which has said it was disappointed by the suit and would continue to work with the regulator, isn’t supposed to have Americans trading on its global exchange under the regulator’s rules.

On Thursday, Behnam said that the operator of the world’s biggest crypto exchange had intentionally broken CFTC rules. If you are going to offer futures contracts in the US, there is a clear understanding that you are registered with the CFTC and comply by the law, he added.

The CFTC is just one of several US bodies that have been investigating Binance’s activities. The Internal Revenue Service, as well as federal prosecutors, have been examining Binance’s compliance with anti-money laundering obligations, Bloomberg News has reported. The Securities and Exchange Commission has been scrutinizing whether the exchange has supported the trading of unregistered securities."

___
Binance has very big problems, because the SEC and the CFTC are working against the exchange. The process will be indicative for everyone else.

I'd rather just give up than spend tons of money over lawsuit on non-ending pressure in which only those on the authority are the ones benefitting. Their government is doing their best to control over the regulations of crypto in their country, I just really hope some other countries won't follow this example. This is already monopoly at its finest.

I mean if the allegations regarding misappropriated use of funds are true, this strike from SEC has some validity. They could
However in general I wonder if the strick policy vs smaller exchanges may have strong negative effects on the US crypto-tech sector in the long run.  The US market may be big but it shouldn't be overestimated vs especially the huge uprising crypto markets in Asia.
Sure, with these measures the SEC will make it very likely that the US market stays in US hands, but anything outside will be ruled by non-US exchanges because they'll be able to offer much more attractive platforms and conditions.

It could be but the US government is after Coinbase as well right, so I guess even if they are US based, the government are still going after them and could potentially sue them unless they cooperate.

Of course they can used the lobbying method, but who are amongst those congressman who are going to support Coinbase?

Either way Coinbase will have to shell out huge money if case of a lawsuit or asking someone to lobby for them.

Rumors are not always to be trusted. I also heard that Coinbase is getting rid of competitors, but to become a leader, they need to make a great product. The monopoly always negatively affects the development of the company and competitors will go to Hong Kong, the Emirates and develop cryptocurrency markets.

Yes there is something suspicious about Coinbase, while great pressure is being put on Binance and other centralized exchanges Coinbase is weathering the storm, why isn't the same excuse applied to Coinbase?

This is a big question mark as it is rumored that Coinbase is the spoiled child of the US government, in addition to Coinbase being completely subject to the US government, pressure groups must be working in secret as well, perhaps the goal is to control Coinbase over the entire market.

This is one of the episodes of the big game. Several large exchanges have already left the US market, and Coinbase is doing well, despite warnings from the regulator. This is an American business and they have a lot of problems being solved with the help of lobbying. An important task for Coinbase to remove the Binance exchange from the US market

Small to mid-tier exchange, yeah, it seems that they doesn't have any chance against this government institutions and the first move was to shut down it's business. That's why it's not good to leave our assets in some obscure exchanges.

@all - what do you think about the SEC vs Coinbase, their is a potential litigation as SEC already send a "Wells notice" against Coinbase. So obviously they are the next exchange that they are going after, and it's a big fish. I'm not seeing Coinbase though going without a fight here like Beaxy Digital Ltd. Chances are, they will go to court and drag this case.

https://www.coinbase.com/blog/we-asked-the-sec-for-reasonable-crypto-rules-for-americans-we-got-legal

Are there any restrictions imposed by the CFTC on a cryptocurrency platform?
There is an office in the SEC that is in charge of this war, and they have been able to reach legal problems with many platforms. However, I see that a platform like Coinbase and others is still working, meaning that the problems with these platforms and their non-compliance with the laws of the United States.



The main goal is to dry up any banking method linking these currencies to the US dollar so that it is without a *dollar cover*

Nice one, for somehow Sec has problematic with any Crypto Related sites. I know they want to protect Investor but when they say a thing it shake crypto price.

---

and yes Bittrex too one of the oldest exchanges decided to close its operation in the US. regulation seems hard to get in the us and the customer seems not big enough

From the USA there is a big struggle for spheres of influence in the crypto-currency market between the SEC and the CFTC. If cryptocurrencies had no future, then this process would be more peaceful. Howey Test from 1946 does not correspond to current realities and therefore any issuer of coins, tokens, stablecoins can be charged and fined. The BUSD ban is a prime example of arbitrariness in the US.

Under such pretexts, you can block any stablecoins and whatever.

Since some of these charges also revolve around the exchange ICO, I guess any exchange who do something like that in the past is likely going to get fined too. I don't remember if there is a law regarding those things when they do an ICO, but it seems like SEC is going all the way to make sure they can milk exchanges dry. Kinda hard to guess what's their goal other than enforcing more control and making sure they can gatekeep any US crypto business in the future. CMIIW.