for me the first thing i search their website, their core team member and their advisor, their official social media account, and all info about them must be clear.
I agree , the first thing you should always check the team, is it fake or not , and then of course are already viewing a product and a roadmap for their 
Topic: How to distinguish between good and bad projects - page 8. (Read 16819 times)
copper member
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1179
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
It's still hard to choose which is good or not, since theres always a downside and good side in something, its good to give chance in new projects as long it has definite goal and legit team or company. But at this time, I prefer to invest on something already proven something in crypto like already in exchanges or have developed products since the market is still in crypto winter.
for me the first thing i search their website, their core team member and their advisor, their official social media account, and all info about them must be clear.
How can you quickly distinguish between good and bad projects and even being invincible in the bear market？
In fact I join an ICO Rating Project recently and now I am testing if the project do help to investors.
Our team has analyzed almost 3,000 blockchain projects.
The analysis dimensions include Exchange, Community, Sentiment, Code and Market.
This project began half a year ago and is currently in beta.
Contact me if you are interested and you can download it for free.
in the first the good and bad projects are always start with same step but at the end only we can find it which will be success but in the middle of the process we had some idea about being a good project investor that will be the important thing. In fact I join an ICO Rating Project recently and now I am testing if the project do help to investors.
Our team has analyzed almost 3,000 blockchain projects.
The analysis dimensions include Exchange, Community, Sentiment, Code and Market.
This project began half a year ago and is currently in beta.
Contact me if you are interested and you can download it for free.
From the last year, I feel it's too difficult to determine which project that could be a good choice for me to invest. They offer so many benefits to me. But many of them have run away from the project and makes some people getting sad. I feel that I need more information when I want to invest in the project because I don't want to get a scam. I've been skipped many of projects which I don't think they can get success in this year and since the last year, I only watching their whitepaper without decide to join with their project.
It's a very difficult task to be able to determine a good from bad project. I have seen many people tagged a project to be good but in the long-run, it became the opposite. As. Much they called a project scam but it became the best.
It is easy to know if the project is good or not, so to know the answer should look at the projects that will be solved without entering the study here. See the team if it is legit and see who will operate it with the purpose and beauty of a product that a project will show, money always remember many ico bounties that are beautiful and attractive but scam so we are careful.
Recently, it is very difficult to understand which project is good and which is not.On the forum lots of advice and tips,but still can not be sure 100 percent.In any case, each has its own criteria or set of criteria.I have my own, but I'm still often wrong.
we are all often mistaken because scammers do their job very well and it’s very difficult to understand the prospects of projects from the early beginning Sometimes its very difficult to differentiate between good and bad ICO. Some ICOs with fake team do update fake amount of money raised and the truth is that they never raise such amount but in order to lure investors then they pretend to have raised huge amount of money above their soft cap. Most of these fake ICOs do pay rating websites to give them good rating so investors can see the good side of them. Therefore, investor must be careful because there are lot of garbage ICOs out there.
You made it dude this is absolutely right! Most ico project right now are full of lie and scammer you can count in your finger a good project. Basically I dont trust anymore to ico project since last year I lost a huge money by investing to ico, now I understand before I investing to ico I will check carefully the profile of the team and what was there goal.
Sometimes its very difficult to differentiate between good and bad ICO. Some ICOs with fake team do update fake amount of money raised and the truth is that they never raise such amount but in order to lure investors then they pretend to have raised huge amount of money above their soft cap. Most of these fake ICOs do pay rating websites to give them good rating so investors can see the good side of them. Therefore, investor must be careful because there are lot of garbage ICOs out there.
Just beware of some projects that are no use and just raised to scam people. Always consider what is their top goal and who were the tem behind it. Some ico projects are not really legit. But if the stage of development of that project you've joined is so far so good, then you choose a good one project that can benefit you.
I see no reason to trust analysts, websites and so on when choosing a project for investment. Everyone has their own opinion and it will be formed only in personal interests. There will be no independent evaluation of the future project. Therefore, I tend to my own analysis.
In ICO rating sites there are dozens of scam cryptocurrencies with good rating. How can we believe these sites? They can be used to learn about new projects, but the final decision should always be decided by you. And this decision should be accepted as a result of long research.
I see no reason to trust analysts, websites and so on when choosing a project for investment. Everyone has their own opinion and it will be formed only in personal interests. There will be no independent evaluation of the future project. Therefore, I tend to my own analysis.
In ICO rating sites there are dozens of scam cryptocurrencies with good rating. How can we believe these sites? They can be used to learn about new projects, but the final decision should always be decided by you. And this decision should be accepted as a result of long research.
I see no reason to trust analysts, websites and so on when choosing a project for investment. Everyone has their own opinion and it will be formed only in personal interests. There will be no independent evaluation of the future project. Therefore, I tend to my own analysis.
How can you quickly distinguish between good and bad projects and even being invincible in the bear market？
In fact I join an ICO Rating Project recently and now I am testing if the project do help to investors.
Our team has analyzed almost 3,000 blockchain projects.
The analysis dimensions include Exchange, Community, Sentiment, Code and Market.
This project began half a year ago and is currently in beta.
Contact me if you are interested and you can download it for free.
In fact I join an ICO Rating Project recently and now I am testing if the project do help to investors.
Our team has analyzed almost 3,000 blockchain projects.
The analysis dimensions include Exchange, Community, Sentiment, Code and Market.
This project began half a year ago and is currently in beta.
Contact me if you are interested and you can download it for free.
Why do we need to contact you if it is free and it can help the community, why not post the download link here so we can download and analyze it here, who knows because of this you'll get merit and trust for helping the community.
Recently, it is very difficult to understand which project is good and which is not.On the forum lots of advice and tips,but still can not be sure 100 percent.In any case, each has its own criteria or set of criteria.I have my own, but I'm still often wrong.
Usually i check on the form of that project, if it has too much similarity with another project, we better cautious since there are chance that it's just a project that being copied from another and it will be mostly scam project.
until now, I don't how to identify between good and ba projects. Its Hard, which I can do is look track record the company or if its the bounty campaign, look who is the bounty manager or team who handle the projects.
Every factors needs to consider in order to analyze and understand how well the project will proceed, you are correct it's really hard to distinguish which project will turned to be good or turned to be bad or scam, all we do is bring up something coming from our own assessment and analyzations our chances to pick the right one will be much higher if we knew what we are aiming to see coming from the project we supports.
I think its hard to distinguish a project if it is good or bad. However we should be aware of the staffs that has been already practicing fraud ico's and projects. They might chance project but the team staffs are only scammers.
To be honest i'm not trusted ICO rating website or project like that. I usually search it by myself how good the project or the ico is. I usually check the project and the team first. If i found something suspicious, i will leave the project and move to good one.
Jump to: