Pages:
Author

Topic: How to double your BTC in a week - page 10. (Read 16809 times)

legendary
Activity: 1868
Merit: 1023
August 17, 2013, 01:58:55 PM
This extremely high rate of profit for investors when compared to JustDice is extremely suspicious.   

JustDice which should have a lot lower variance due to more volume - even loses money sometimes.  This site should be losing money regularly.  JustDice rarely returns 5%-10% per month.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
August 17, 2013, 01:16:56 PM
Here are the txid's of my four Casinobit transactions, two deposits and two withdrawals.

https://blockchain.info/tx/3ae3615cb1b12cc7dabb912ae25db713778adb2d39837ade8a7e04732dd7d410
https://blockchain.info/tx/58a30817dbd318f4dd8a76eee31c3c207355796b7b10d20024244ec085e4c724
https://blockchain.info/tx/33815ddb64ffab5b220195e80a8130c17927cd644fb81694576fe9d08b5bc16c
https://blockchain.info/tx/1ef4a60ec4cb06541ec4b127d9437bcac69ec3351261b15a893d6db76882fce8

Tradefortress, you can verify based on my inputs.io account that the withdrawal address is the same address that I sent money into inputs from (and then transferred over to Coinlenders).

As all of you can see, I sent in 3 BTC, pulled out 6.11 BTC, sent in 3 BTC, pulled out 3.76 BTC. I still have 5.29 BTC sitting in Casinobit as well.

I have been extremely open about all of my activity since joining this forum a month and a half ago, through the good and the bad. Call me stupid or too trusting or whatever, but I really don't appreciate having my integrity called into question (i.e. being called a shill).

Thanks.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
What doesn't kill you only makes you sicker!
August 17, 2013, 12:16:01 PM
Well folks - I thought I'd investigate whether this site is for real or not as there's too much risk of sock-puppetry going on here.

I've put in 1BTC and now have 3.6BTC.

I've put in a withdrawal attempt for 1BTC but the site is down due to the DDoS so I've emailed CasinoBit to make sure my transactions are executed (I'm away for a few days).

When I get back I'll let you all know if the withdrawal was successful.
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
August 17, 2013, 11:51:49 AM
geez, TradeFortress + his shill puppets is almost as bad as this site

For reference Smiley

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2753141
member
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
August 17, 2013, 11:50:56 AM
I have obtained the full list of their Bitcoin betting addresses from their javascript file. I then ran a script to calculate the total amount received.

You have obtained a list of BTC bet on-the-chain, you can also create an account, deposit BTC and bet off the chain faster (it's instant).

The only thing you've proved is that you posses little to no reading abilities.

And no, your little script is not the DDOS.

Whoa! thats a lot of work for you to run that DB on the site out (PS:This is the DDos attack? CB owner i guess i shall be laughing)

TF: the Win he says is what he sent out, not really a win, Just like the win in the mind of DevinTheDev, it doesnt count it the wager. Plus he got on-site betting right??

Only two things are infinite....
I stand corrected and apologize for my previous post. If I was able to access your website non-sporadically, I'd have checked if bets could be made on-chain.


He bought ACCs for free ripples. This is completely off topic to casinobit.

It's on topic because people are questioning the integrity of this site. If accounts that post here were before involved on another heist obviously these people work together somehow.
You two seem to work well answering the same question for one another. And both came up in connection with the groupbuy eruptors scam. The apple does not fall far from the tree.

Anyway it's not my business.

geez, TradeFortress + his shill puppets is almost as bad as this site
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
August 17, 2013, 11:44:53 AM
I have obtained the full list of their Bitcoin betting addresses from their javascript file. I then ran a script to calculate the total amount received.

You have obtained a list of BTC bet on-the-chain, you can also create an account, deposit BTC and bet off the chain faster (it's instant).

The only thing you've proved is that you posses little to no reading abilities.

And no, your little script is not the DDOS.

Whoa! thats a lot of work for you to run that DB on the site out (PS:This is the DDos attack? CB owner i guess i shall be laughing)

TF: the Win he says is what he sent out, not really a win, Just like the win in the mind of DevinTheDev, it doesnt count it the wager. Plus he got on-site betting right??

Only two things are infinite....
I stand corrected and apologize for my previous post. If I was able to access your website non-sporadically, I'd have checked if bets could be made on-chain.
vip
Activity: 756
Merit: 503
August 17, 2013, 11:39:29 AM
seems like a catastrophic coding oversight to consider further investments as 'house profit' and credit existing investments.  It's now simply a race to see who withdraws their BTC first.

Will

The coding is excellent, we are currently under constant DDoS attacks and have already been asked for ransom in the past, you can check the history of this account.

After the scare we've lost ~100BTC and immediately got an investment for 200BTC from a single user, you can divest if you like, we don't really have any moral obligations to pay the people that really deserve the investments.

I think the analysis above, and just basic math, seems to indicate otherwise.  Notice I am being kind by choosing to apply Hanlon's razor; others might not be so generous.  I wish you all the best at resolving your DDoS.

Will

Respected member in PM:

Quote
Withraw about 63BTC out of about 43BTC investment. Site says I'm sitting on 85BTC

DDoS does not cause this, shoddy coding does.
Not sure how you got this PM but the 85BTC is profit left on the site after withdrawal.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
August 17, 2013, 11:36:36 AM
I have obtained the full list of their Bitcoin betting addresses from their javascript file. I then ran a script to calculate the total amount received.

You have obtained a list of BTC bet on-the-chain, you can also create an account, deposit BTC and bet off the chain faster (it's instant).

The only thing you've proved is that you posses little to no reading abilities.

And no, your little script is not the DDOS.

Whoa! thats a lot of work for you to run that DB on the site out (PS:This is the DDos attack? CB owner i guess i shall be laughing)

TF: the Win he says is what he sent out, not really a win, Just like the win in the mind of DevinTheDev, it doesnt count it the wager. Plus he got on-site betting right??

Only two things are infinite....
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
August 17, 2013, 11:36:10 AM
Everybody get your coins out...while you still can!
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
Casper - A failed entrepenuer who looks like Zhou
August 17, 2013, 11:33:51 AM
Whoa! thats a lot of work for you to run that DB on the site out (PS:This is the DDos attack? CB owner i guess i shall be laughing)

TF: the Win he says is what he sent out, not really a win, Just like the win in the mind of DevinTheDev, it doesnt count it the wager. Plus he got on-site betting right??
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
August 17, 2013, 11:11:42 AM
The coding is excellent

A simple way to quell the fears that people appear to have is to publish two things:

1) an anonymised list of investors and invested amounts (so people can check how much is invested)
2) the cold wallet address (so people can check you still control all invested coins)

I think with those two things people are able to satisfy themselves that everything is as it appears, and that there's nothing "ponzi-ish" going on.

A clear statement as to whether you consider new investment as profit for old investors would also help a lot, I'm sure.  Is it possible for an investor to make a profit on his investment if there are never any bets placed?  Some people seem to be saying it is.

I will check if I can do the above but it's quite ironic coming from you dooglus, especially since you have denied showing any proof of any bets whatsoever all while claiming that you do not want to sacrifice the privacy of your customers.

Just to clear everything up, here's a bit fat NO, you will never receive a cent should we stop receiving bets, you are paid from the house edge not from other investments.
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
August 17, 2013, 11:07:38 AM
The coding is excellent

A simple way to quell the fears that people appear to have is to publish two things:

1) an anonymised list of investors and invested amounts (so people can check how much is invested)
2) the cold wallet address (so people can check you still control all invested coins)

I think with those two things people are able to satisfy themselves that everything is as it appears, and that there's nothing "ponzi-ish" going on.

A clear statement as to whether you consider new investment as profit for old investors would also help a lot, I'm sure.  Is it possible for an investor to make a profit on his investment if there are never any bets placed?  Some people seem to be saying it is.
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
August 17, 2013, 11:04:20 AM
seems like a catastrophic coding oversight to consider further investments as 'house profit' and credit existing investments.  It's now simply a race to see who withdraws their BTC first.

Will

The coding is excellent, we are currently under constant DDoS attacks and have already been asked for ransom in the past, you can check the history of this account.

After the scare we've lost ~100BTC and immediately got an investment for 200BTC from a single user, you can divest if you like, we don't really have any moral obligations to pay the people that really deserve the investments.

I think the analysis above, and just basic math, seems to indicate otherwise.  Notice I am being kind by choosing to apply Hanlon's razor; others might not be so generous.  I wish you all the best at resolving your DDoS.

Will

Respected member in PM:

Quote
Withraw about 63BTC out of about 43BTC investment. Site says I'm sitting on 85BTC

DDoS does not cause this, shoddy coding does.
hero member
Activity: 767
Merit: 500
August 17, 2013, 11:03:05 AM
seems like a catastrophic coding oversight to consider further investments as 'house profit' and credit existing investments.  It's now simply a race to see who withdraws their BTC first.

Will

The coding is excellent, we are currently under constant DDoS attacks and have already been asked for ransom in the past, you can check the history of this account.

After the scare we've lost ~100BTC and immediately got an investment for 200BTC from a single user, you can divest if you like, we don't really have any moral obligations to pay the people that really deserve the investments.

I think the analysis above, and just basic math, seems to indicate otherwise.  Notice I am being kind by choosing to apply Hanlon's razor; others might not be so generous.  I wish you all the best at resolving your DDoS.

Will
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
August 17, 2013, 10:52:22 AM
seems like a catastrophic coding oversight to consider further investments as 'house profit' and credit existing investments.  It's now simply a race to see who withdraws their BTC first.

Will

The coding is excellent, we are currently under constant DDoS attacks and have already been asked for ransom in the past, you can check the history of this account.

After the scare we've lost ~100BTC and immediately got an investment for 200BTC from a single user, you can divest if you like, we don't really have any moral obligations to pay the people that really deserve the investments.
hero member
Activity: 767
Merit: 500
August 17, 2013, 10:44:34 AM
seems like a catastrophic coding oversight to consider further investments as 'house profit' and credit existing investments.  It's now simply a race to see who withdraws their BTC first.

Will
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
Casper - A failed entrepenuer who looks like Zhou
August 17, 2013, 09:12:00 AM
Quote
And why you yourself are purchasing bitcointalk accounts of which at least one has been involved in a 300 BTC scam?

Because i have cashed the XRP out of those accounts.

BTW, you have a fast reading speed. Consider joining a contest?
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
August 17, 2013, 09:11:34 AM
He bought ACCs for free ripples. This is completely off topic to casinobit.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
Casper - A failed entrepenuer who looks like Zhou
August 17, 2013, 09:08:15 AM
As there are no sign that CasinoBit owner is considering that he need to find the bug and fix his site, I am here to announce that this site is a scam.

As all of you have noticed, this site have a quite high return of investment with a very short period of time, whilst it have a very low amount of traffic and transaction. As the database of CasinoBit.net is kinda public, I have calculated the transaction sum in the past 24 hours, ~250BTC. Thus the raked amount is 7.42BTC (2.9% for European Roulette)

Meanwhile, I've contacted some investors of CasinoBit, just to confirm that not only I am getting some off the EV amount profit.
For example for vlee who have deposited 6BTC, he went up to 26BTC in one day while only 40BTC was won in since the day he started the investment
Promise of high yields + promise of no risk = (likely) PONZI

Investor beware... Roll Eyes
You got it right actually!

First to finish reading the message and press the divest button to withdrawl, you will be the winner Smiley
Who doesn't like meme anyway
vip
Activity: 756
Merit: 503
August 17, 2013, 08:40:25 AM
Got initial investment back +50%. Will leave the rest of my profit on the site and see what happen.
Pages:
Jump to: