Topic: How to get accepted to signature campaign? - page 5. (Read 2050 times)
Well the other reason there are lots of people right now are joining in signature campaign now a days and i think it would be hard to join signature campaign right now . but if you can be made a constructive post and increase the quality of your post and be early when applying in signature campaign you can be accepted.. Most they are accepted those people who contribute here in forum if you can responds and help other people who needs answer here in forum and you can answer them all those post for me are eligible for me as constructive and high quality than just posting the same what other posting too.. since you are just Jr. member i think you don't have lots of knowledge about bitcoin or cryptocurrency so for me better to be active here and make your with sense.
Hello, I have not had any luck with getting accepted to any signature campaigns and was wondering what one could do in order to increase the likelihood of being accepted?
The number one reason and the most important is the quality of your posts. If you look at your posts they are very short and not on subject. Almost all the signatures have the rule of posts where they should be at least 75 characters wich means at least 7-10 words but thats like the minimum. You should check the members wich participated in campaigns and see how their posts looks and do the same thing. Be careful and do not copy paste posts because you are going to be banned on this forumWould you mind telling me which of my October posts this would apply to? I just looked through all of my October posts and most (if not all) are over that 7-10 word limit and on topic for the discussion that they are responding to. Unless I am misunderstanding what is meant by "on topic." I am assuming that all of my posts about the taxable nature of crypto-currency is "on topic" given that the OPs were asking about taxes on crypto.
edit: legitimate question, not trying to be a dick
?
Hello, I have not had any luck with getting accepted to any signature campaigns and was wondering what one could do in order to increase the likelihood of being accepted?
The number one reason and the most important is the quality of your posts. If you look at your posts they are very short and not on subject. Almost all the signatures have the rule of posts where they should be at least 75 characters wich means at least 7-10 words but thats like the minimum. You should check the members wich participated in campaigns and see how their posts looks and do the same thing. Be careful and do not copy paste posts because you are going to be banned on this forumWould you mind telling me which of my October posts this would apply to? I just looked through all of my October posts and most (if not all) are over that 7-10 word limit and on topic for the discussion that they are responding to. Unless I am misunderstanding what is meant by "on topic." I am assuming that all of my posts about the taxable nature of crypto-currency is "on topic" given that the OPs were asking about taxes on crypto.
edit: legitimate question, not trying to be a dick
Hello, I have not had any luck with getting accepted to any signature campaigns and was wondering what one could do in order to increase the likelihood of being accepted?
The number one reason and the most important is the quality of your posts. If you look at your posts they are very short and not on subject. Almost all the signatures have the rule of posts where they should be at least 75 characters wich means at least 7-10 words but thats like the minimum. You should check the members wich participated in campaigns and see how their posts looks and do the same thing. Be careful and do not copy paste posts because you are going to be banned on this forumWould you mind telling me which of my October posts this would apply to? I just looked through all of my October posts and most (if not all) are over that 7-10 word limit and on topic for the discussion that they are responding to. Unless I am misunderstanding what is meant by "on topic." I am assuming that all of my posts about the taxable nature of crypto-currency is "on topic" given that the OPs were asking about taxes on crypto.
edit: legitimate question, not trying to be a dick
Hello, I have not had any luck with getting accepted to any signature campaigns and was wondering what one could do in order to increase the likelihood of being accepted?
The number one reason and the most important is the quality of your posts. If you look at your posts they are very short and not on subject. Almost all the signatures have the rule of posts where they should be at least 75 characters wich means at least 7-10 words but thats like the minimum. You should check the members wich participated in campaigns and see how their posts looks and do the same thing. Be careful and do not copy paste posts because you are going to be banned on this forum Yeah, I have seen that post, I just wish that there was a way to get feedback when rejected from a campaign so that I could know what exactly an individual operator thinks that I am lacking. However, I understand that they sometimes reject too many per week to give individualized feedback. It is just annoying being rejected week after week and not knowing for sure why.
You can just ask the manager on the reason of your rejection and most of your post are just application with my campaign that I'm with and you should stop doing that again and again. Instead try to improve your post that can help the discussion that you are posting.
10 out of 90+ is hardly "most" and I have been focusing on posting in "legal" and other relevant boards recently. Hopefully it works out soon.
You can try to join in some bounties that be found here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=238.0 and most of the campaigns there doesn't have any requirement and qualifications. You just have to follow their rules and regulations but the payment will be in their token / stakes and their very own alt coin.
What rank were you when you were finally accepted into your first campaign (if you don't mind me asking)? I am always looking for opportunities to earn some Bitcoin, but my professional background doesn't lend itself very well to the cryptocurrency marketplace. I am a professional genealogists who went to law school and am now an attorney. Neither of these fields allow for much of the anonymity that many crypto-users desire to maintain. I can't exactly show up in court to represent someone without knowing their real information, and a genealogist is useless without true information about a person's lineage, haha.
Yeah, I have seen that post, I just wish that there was a way to get feedback when rejected from a campaign so that I could know what exactly an individual operator thinks that I am lacking. However, I understand that they sometimes reject too many per week to give individualized feedback. It is just annoying being rejected week after week and not knowing for sure why.
You can just ask the manager on the reason of your rejection and most of your post are just application with my campaign that I'm with and you should stop doing that again and again. Instead try to improve your post that can help the discussion that you are posting.
10 out of 90+ is hardly "most" and I have been focusing on posting in "legal" and other relevant boards recently. Hopefully it works out soon.
You can try to join in some bounties that be found here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=238.0 and most of the campaigns there doesn't have any requirement and qualifications. You just have to follow their rules and regulations but the payment will be in their token / stakes and their very own alt coin.
Try to read this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/signature-campaign-guidelines-read-this-before-starting-or-joining-a-campaign-1684035 and also this one https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/campaign-ettiquettesignature-twitter-facebook-or-any-other-type-1692740
Yeah, I have seen that post, I just wish that there was a way to get feedback when rejected from a campaign so that I could know what exactly an individual operator thinks that I am lacking. However, I understand that they sometimes reject too many per week to give individualized feedback. It is just annoying being rejected week after week and not knowing for sure why.
It looks like you have been applying to Lutpin run campaigns, judging from his post history, he doesn't appreciate people posting in Politics/Society about disproving religion (which your post history shows that you have done). You might have just pissed him off if he is anti-atheist bigot and will just never get into a campaign that he runs. You might as well just move on to a new campaign run by someone unbiased.
Try to read this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/signature-campaign-guidelines-read-this-before-starting-or-joining-a-campaign-1684035 and also this one https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/campaign-ettiquettesignature-twitter-facebook-or-any-other-type-1692740
Yeah, I have seen that post, I just wish that there was a way to get feedback when rejected from a campaign so that I could know what exactly an individual operator thinks that I am lacking. However, I understand that they sometimes reject too many per week to give individualized feedback. It is just annoying being rejected week after week and not knowing for sure why.
Yeah, I have seen that post, I just wish that there was a way to get feedback when rejected from a campaign so that I could know what exactly an individual operator thinks that I am lacking. However, I understand that they sometimes reject too many per week to give individualized feedback. It is just annoying being rejected week after week and not knowing for sure why.
You can just ask the manager on the reason of your rejection and most of your post are just application with my campaign that I'm with and you should stop doing that again and again. Instead try to improve your post that can help the discussion that you are posting.
10 out of 90+ is hardly "most" and I have been focusing on posting in "legal" and other relevant boards recently. Hopefully it works out soon.
Yeah, I have seen that post, I just wish that there was a way to get feedback when rejected from a campaign so that I could know what exactly an individual operator thinks that I am lacking. However, I understand that they sometimes reject too many per week to give individualized feedback. It is just annoying being rejected week after week and not knowing for sure why.
You can just ask the manager on the reason of your rejection and most of your post are just application with my campaign that I'm with and you should stop doing that again and again. Instead try to improve your post that can help the discussion that you are posting.
Hello, I have not had any luck with getting accepted to any signature campaigns and was wondering what one could do in order to increase the likelihood of being accepted?
Jump to: