Pages:
Author

Topic: How to judge whether newly listed coins are worth investing? - page 3. (Read 739 times)

hero member
Activity: 1302
Merit: 503
There's really a lot to consider whether a coin is worth investing but mostly some people buy it if its listed to big exchange like Binance which leads to pumping, some people think it's nice to buy those kinds of coins since they are new and fresh and it is listed on big exchange.

But me, I still choose the old coins with has a big market cap already rather than investing to lowcap coins which some people managed to control or manipulate.
- Some of the new projects listed are actually pumped by the exchange's reputation system but through that to see the worthiness of these projects is honestly too difficult because this is also just the result of a reasonable marketing process, good brands will launch a successful opening day but then to keep customers coming back is about quality and reliability and to have a good experience, it's features, facilities and roles as well as care team. Many projects are rated one star after only one day of opening because of such problems
sr. member
Activity: 1960
Merit: 273
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
There's really a lot to consider whether a coin is worth investing but mostly some people buy it if its listed to big exchange like Binance which leads to pumping, some people think it's nice to buy those kinds of coins since they are new and fresh and it is listed on big exchange.

But me, I still choose the old coins with has a big market cap already rather than investing to lowcap coins which some people managed to control or manipulate.
If it is listed on a large stock exchange, of course, the increase in market capitalization will increase. The new coins are actually fun to trade. the hype was created and the trade was still bustling.
but many choose top market assets for investment and also choose new coins for day trading. those who know the potential of the project will love the hype.
member
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
To judge whether a ratio is valuable and worth investing, it is necessary to analyze and judge the projects behind it.
Read its white paper carefully, analyze its project itself, prospects and technology, and see if there is plagiarism and whether the project is innovative.
Study the founding team to see if their previous projects are related to blockchain projects and if they have any successful experience.
Search the discussion about the project in the forum or website to see the evaluation of it.
member
Activity: 113
Merit: 32
See if you can go to the three major exchanges, because the currency information can be viewed on the exchange, the exchange will verify the token, and some junk coins can only be circulated on the trading platform built by themselves.
There are also news related to tokens, because some news will affect the price trend of the currency.
The white paper is just to understand the information, because the white paper also has plagiarism, and it can also be outsourced. It is not trustworthy.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1127
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
It is difficult for a person to make an accurate assessment of a project because there are cases where:

1 - team members are real

2 - the whitepaper is real

3 - The project idea is also good

But the project fails and becomes a scam, in these cases (unbelievably there are many cases and few people talk about it) the project creators are not very active in the project development after they become rich with the project and of course people can no longer accuse them of scam
member
Activity: 135
Merit: 16
To judge whether it is worth buying, the white paper is the most important thing. The best way is to read the white paper. The white paper allows us to clearly understand the purpose and total amount of this token.
To understand the ranking and information of this coin, only by understanding can you know whether it is worth investing in and whether it has a future.
Or take a look at the page design of the official website of the token to see if the technology is excellent.
member
Activity: 116
Merit: 23
  • Trading platform Whether the currency can be found on mainstream exchanges, the exchange will verify the relevant information of the currency. The rubbish coin will only circulate in the trading platform built by itself.
  • white paper Learn about the currency’s issuance mechanism, equity distribution, total amount of tokens and long-term planning from the white paper, and see if it plagiarizes the content of other projects.
  • Founding team and investment background The team that really wants to develop the project will deal with the problem seriously, and carry out publicity and maintenance.
sr. member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 253
If it is about the newly listed coin, I personally will think twice about where it is listed. If it is on the big and reputable exchanges, I will prefer to also analyze the projects including their roadmap and of course their team. So far, we have seen so many newly listed coins. But they will drop drastically only after several days of listing. That is why it is important to consider the fundamentals of the coins themselves.
Yeah,it wouldn't be significant if its just listed on a certain exchange that it isn't really that much known unless if its listed on Binance then that would be an another story on where majority of investors
would really be looking this to be that potential since its listed but those people would just simply enter when the dump happens.

because most of the time when a coin is recently listed then it would surely dump and that's the right time for buying time.

That's very right. Some newly-listed coins are going for never-heard crypto exchanges, with very low trading volume. But definitely, if it is listed in Binance, we see it as a strong one. If the team can manage to list it in binance, then, they have pretty strong background why they surpassed binance requirements. Also, one important factor for me is their use case. Are there people using their app or services? Because if there is none, then think about its future.
listing on binance is the main reference that the coin is done seriously, considering we know that besides requiring large funds to list on binance, of course the coin has a clear target audience because it has a theme that many people need. no wonder when a project announced that it would be listing on binance its coin was immediately invaded by investors
TWW
full member
Activity: 1456
Merit: 109
if newly listed on the stock exchange. The first thing we see is what exchange the new token is traded on.
if it is directly listed on the top market exchange, I am sure that there must be a positive value from the new project.
but if it is listed on an exchange with small trades, it will require a more in-depth analysis to be sure.
because a new project that has been listed on the stock exchange may consist of a team that is not professional in developing the project.
For new tokens, the main analysis is the trading volume on the exchange. if it does have busy trading there is a possibility that the new asset can be good for the long term.
member
Activity: 63
Merit: 11
  • White paper: Check whether there is plagiarism and whether the project is complete
  • Team situation: whether the core members are public and whether they have experience
  • Social community: watch the interaction between the team and fans in social groups such as Twitter or Facebook, and related forum discussions
hero member
Activity: 2072
Merit: 656
royalstarscasino.com
That's very right. Some newly-listed coins are going for never-heard crypto exchanges, with very low trading volume. But definitely, if it is listed in Binance, we see it as a strong one. If the team can manage to list it in binance, then, they have pretty strong background why they surpassed binance requirements. Also, one important factor for me is their use case. Are there people using their app or services? Because if there is none, then think about its future.
That is true.
Listing in Binance may be the most expected by all projects.
But, for a new coin, they may start their coin or token in the middle top exchange.
I know that it is very risky moreover if the project is listed in non-reputable exchanges. that is why it is better to avoid this kind of token except we can really know how to utilize the chance to take profits from it.
If the token or coin has been listed in the middle exchanges, hopefully, they can have a much better trading volume at first. Due to the development, listing in other exchanges such as Okex, Kucoin, Bithumb, and other top exchanges will be also interesting.
And then, reaching Binance and also other tops exchanges, will be a great thing.
However, in this case, the project will be also more successful if after listing in the top coins or before it so, they can do or offer the best progress, continuity, and also further developments. If they have good and strong fundamentals, they will also have a good chance to be more successful.
full member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 138
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
If it is about the newly listed coin, I personally will think twice about where it is listed. If it is on the big and reputable exchanges, I will prefer to also analyze the projects including their roadmap and of course their team. So far, we have seen so many newly listed coins. But they will drop drastically only after several days of listing. That is why it is important to consider the fundamentals of the coins themselves.
Yeah,it wouldn't be significant if its just listed on a certain exchange that it isn't really that much known unless if its listed on Binance then that would be an another story on where majority of investors
would really be looking this to be that potential since its listed but those people would just simply enter when the dump happens.

because most of the time when a coin is recently listed then it would surely dump and that's the right time for buying time.

That's very right. Some newly-listed coins are going for never-heard crypto exchanges, with very low trading volume. But definitely, if it is listed in Binance, we see it as a strong one. If the team can manage to list it in binance, then, they have pretty strong background why they surpassed binance requirements. Also, one important factor for me is their use case. Are there people using their app or services? Because if there is none, then think about its future.
hero member
Activity: 2968
Merit: 687
If it is about the newly listed coin, I personally will think twice about where it is listed. If it is on the big and reputable exchanges, I will prefer to also analyze the projects including their roadmap and of course their team. So far, we have seen so many newly listed coins. But they will drop drastically only after several days of listing. That is why it is important to consider the fundamentals of the coins themselves.
Yeah,it wouldn't be significant if its just listed on a certain exchange that it isn't really that much known unless if its listed on Binance then that would be an another story on where majority of investors
would really be looking this to be that potential since its listed but those people would just simply enter when the dump happens.

because most of the time when a coin is recently listed then it would surely dump and that's the right time for buying time.You should be wise on when to get in

and also you should always research if the said coin does have potential or did really just dump and waiting up for forever for some recovery?
sr. member
Activity: 1414
Merit: 255
First of all, you should always start from the team. Information about the team and its previous projects should be open and complete, this is the first thing to study in order to understand in whose hands and under what leadership the project is located. As a second point, I would study partners and foundations.

So what if the team in project hasn't joined any projects before? wouldn't it be more difficult to identify the team? Then partner is sometimes also manipulated by project. Maybe add little to see the products on offer
sr. member
Activity: 2422
Merit: 357
First of all, you should always start from the team. Information about the team and its previous projects should be open and complete, this is the first thing to study in order to understand in whose hands and under what leadership the project is located. As a second point, I would study partners and foundations.

Partners plays a big role to attract more investors, if that new project connected to a good partner then that could be an indication of a good project. Additionally, I always look at the price chart of that new coins after a week since I don’t want to FOMO so I have to wait and see how the public works on that in the last 7 days. It’s too risky to invest on new project but if you do your assignment and your own research, you can have at least a good confidence to invest.
full member
Activity: 1582
Merit: 132
BK8 - Most Trusted Gambling Platform
If it is about the newly listed coin, I personally will think twice about where it is listed. If it is on the big and reputable exchanges, I will prefer to also analyze the projects including their roadmap and of course their team. So far, we have seen so many newly listed coins. But they will drop drastically only after several days of listing. That is why it is important to consider the fundamentals of the coins themselves.
sr. member
Activity: 1512
Merit: 292
www.cd3d.app
First of all, you should always start from the team. Information about the team and its previous projects should be open and complete, this is the first thing to study in order to understand in whose hands and under what leadership the project is located. As a second point, I would study partners and foundations.
sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 251
Any investment is risky, so how should we distinguish between empty coin and MLM coin?
Aircoin is a white paper written casually by the project team, and the official website packs and collects money.
MLM tokens are mainly used to obtain reward tokens through pulling heads and offline multi-level development, or to obtain tokens by recharging members of different levels and purchasing virtual mining rights of different levels.
How do we know?
1. The attributes of the project itself: public chain currency, Token token
2. Token issuance method: does not rely on the issuance of a specific currency institution, and is generated through a large number of calculations based on a specific algorithm, which is a decentralized issuance method
3. Trading method: Digital currencies can be freely traded on exchanges. There will be multiple exchanges supporting transactions for the same currency, and coins can be deposited and withdrawn freely. At the same time, different people can conduct peer-to-peer transfers and transactions.
4. Implementation method: The token itself is an open source program and is maintained in the Github community. The open source code shows the parameters and methods of its total limit
5. Whether to provide a link to the source code: Generally, decentralized digital currencies will give a link to the source code in a prominent position on the official website. This is to show the operating mechanism of the currency system openly and transparently
6. Does the official website start with https: Generally, the official website and transaction URL of decentralized digital currencies start with https. The purpose of such websites is to protect users' data from being stolen illegally.
Do you have anything to add?
On the number two point,  I will like to say that decentralisation is not done just by the team or the 'so call algorithm' that generate large supply of the coin without community participation and fairly distribution. If all the coin or token is minted or generated by the team of such coin or token alone,  such coin can not be said to be well decentalized!
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1124
Any investment is risky, so how should we distinguish between empty coin and MLM coin?
Aircoin is a white paper written casually by the project team, and the official website packs and collects money.
MLM tokens are mainly used to obtain reward tokens through pulling heads and offline multi-level development, or to obtain tokens by recharging members of different levels and purchasing virtual mining rights of different levels.
How do we know?
I really do not judge them, I just do not invest into them at all. There is no point on investing into a coin that is barely even there, if it is listed for the first time ever there are so many things that could go wild, I do not even invest in their first month at all. Maybe after a month or so I could potentially do something about it, but usually almost every single I invested so far has been around for nearly 6 months or more and those are the most recent ones, considering nearly 80% of my portfolio is btc/eth/bnb that means all the "new" ones I have that are even older than 6 months are just under 5% of my portfolio so even they are not too much of a part in my calculations.

I honestly do not see the reward at jumping into a brand new coin, it just doesn't make sense to me, it is not really something huge that we could profit that easily, the risks are way too high.
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 11
Every new coins that listed on binance in 2019 are now so successful e.g matic and others, the thing is exchanges have a good role to play here if it's top exchange like binance then the project isn't a joke most especially if they raised Funds through binance, gate or Huobi
Pages:
Jump to: