Topic: How to make bitcoin be worth more? - page 2. (Read 6487 times)

Last year's "crash" was because the bubble burst. Back then, Bitcoin's value was much lower than it is now, but speculators kept on buying like crazy. An exchange got hacked, which caused a sudden mass realisation in many people's minds: "I paid too much". And when a lot of people suddenly don't want a product any more, what happens to its price? However, thanks to Bitoin's mini DotCom, and continued investment by entrepreneurs, the market is now more mature and the economy has a lot more value supporting that ~$5 exchange rate.

With 40Gh/s you would control around 40/12000 = 0.33% of the total mining supply. And then there's circulation of older coins. So the price probably wouldn't change much no matter what you did with the coins. You could stick them for sale on MtGox or Intersango for $5.30 each, or how about $6? The other miners would have slightly less bitcoins to sell, so they might be inclined to put their prices up slightly. Whether or not people actually buy at a higher price is another matter.

Jesus guys, I didn't expect to get the value of 1 bitcoin to raise to $20 in 1 day. I was just curious to what happened.
I'm really happy that 1 BTC = ~$5.1 USD. The reason I wanted to know how to make it worth more was to know what would the impact be if I built a 40gh/s mining equipment. Like, if the reason why it went from $20 to $5 was because ppl started mining more, then I would prob not spend that much on my rig.

From fundamentals, the easiest way to make the bitcoin be worth more is to increase the scope of services and goods available via bitcoin. The bitcoin economy is still essentially a hobbyist economy, but it has passed what I believe to be the point of critical mass. My intuitive guess about the best policy for bitcoin usage is for the average coin user's behavior to match the following profile:

• buy bitcoins at a relatively constant rate, probably some factor of your income
• partition your bitcoins into two buckets, save and spend. Ideally, save should be a small factor of spend, I'm thinking 10%
• spend extra effort both to find ways to make your normal purchases in bitcoins, and to constructively criticize any points of friction in the process

I believe the net effect of this policy will be to encourage stable deflation of the bitcoin economy (deflation can occur even as extra coins are generated if the real value of services available for bitcoins grows faster than the influx of mined coins). This deflation will serve as the incentive for new users to bear the additional risks and inconveniences of participating in the bitcoin economy.

A crucial aspect is to encourage vendors to accept bitcoins. I think the sweet spot for current growth is local services, e.g. contractors, plumbers, mechanics, specifically friends and family of existing bitcoin users. If we explain the deflating asset concept, then they will have incentive to accept bitcoins via bitpay or equivalent. They can pursue some similar partitioned conversion back into local fiat, taking slightly lower immediate profit in e.g. USD, but building up a small base of hopefully deflating profit.

I see bitcoin adoption following roughly the following trajectory:

• initial experimentation, prior to real value, e.g. during cpu mining times.
• adoption as services are offered, valuation unstable and localized pre-exchange
• exchanges are offered as services, valuation globalized and visibility causes exponential growth in value based on speculating trend-chasers, begins to be used as black market currency in addition to limited local and electronic commerce
• media hype, bubble pops, we're all familiar with this
• valuation undershoots real value of services offered, gradual buy-back starts
• chargebacks cause businesses and an exchange to fail, money path to bitcoins gets harder, price remains gradually stronger (real strength of economy shown here)
• lowering of barrier to entry due to bitpay, bitinstant, etc. makes it viable for localized service providers to offer bitcoin as a payment option (<- we're here)
• localized contractors accept bitcoins, gradually accumulate extra bitcoins they can spend, begin building locally strong bitcoin sub-economies
• bitcoin will undergo massive scaling difficulty. At this point, the protocol and topology of the network will need to be revisited and preferably implemented in a more separation of concerns manner, e.g. POS nodes, spend-only nodes, economic and fraud monitoring nodes. Additionally, the probability of making stupid-human mistakes needs to be lowered, e.g. off-by-one-digit overspends, poorly secured wallets with significant amounts in them, etc.
• larger service providers (e.g. commercialized fleets rather than individual vendors) will eventually catch on and either want a piece of the action or lobby for legal action, this is a crucial point for the economy, but at least in areas where ideas of freedom are important, effective communication with the press should be able to keep the economy alive
• if larger service providers begin accepting bitcoin, it should be a relatively fast march to spread through the real-economy, because deflating assets can be accepted at a discount to inflating assets (e.g. USD), so consumers should be able to save money by exchanging to bitcoin and purchasing via bitcoin
• the economy will have actually arrived when we can buy gas and groceries for bitcoin

This has probably been covered 100 times, but where does one draw the line between crooks and the oppressed? If Arabs buy alcohol using bitcoin, how is that different from Westerners buying marijuana using bitcoin? Similarly, prostitution is legal in some countries, but illegal in others. Who is right? There are often lots of social problems with things like drugs and selling sexual services, but what about things that are more subtle like intellectual property? Is it OK for large corporations to cheaply produce medicines in third world countries, but then claim exclusive export rights for 20-or-so years? After all, those corporations are still profiting from America's military activities that devastated/destabilised a number of Asian and South American countries.

The export concept reminds me of an important point. Since the bitcoin economy is so small at the moment, it's hard to compare prices internally vs externally. If someone lives within the bitcoin economy and uses the currency directly for everything, how does their standard of living compare to people using other currencies? If things are very cheap, exporters (e.g.: farmers) might want the exchange rate to go down, so that they can sell more stock and make higher profits.

I understand but you have ask yourself what all that tor bitcoin traffic is doing? All those folk with oodles of dough, who used to have to do shady back room deals with briefcases full of pimped money, recently laundered, paying %10 to %50 for protection, are now using our currency for next to nothing. Doesn't that just make you want to take out that old pair of knuckle dusters? I mean it wouldn't make any difference to them, or any user for that matter if Bitcoin was $100 or $1000, in the end they and their customers are extremely happy, while the miners are being asked to sell that almost invaluable facility for next to cost. The reality is the crooks are getting away with it at our expense and IMHO just this one reason sees Bitcoin undervalued.

What you are describing is the hope that gains on the speculation of the exchange rate will allow a bitcoin business to self-fund (bootstrap).

While there might have been a handful of bitcoin businesses that benefited greatly from the rise from a BTC/USD below $1 to it being in double digits, it is likely those gains have probably since been spent and additionally, is a move that likely will not repeat at least not to that degree nor over such a short period of time.

So Bitcoin now faces the real world, where many businesses get built and launched with the help of seed funding (e..g, CoinLab, BitInstant, etc.) or loans (few of which share publicly that they have borrowed) and to some smaller but growing extent equity gained from IPOs (e..g, on GLBSE and MPEx).  At the same time there still are many ideas that individuals can build and run solo or as a team with cofounders where only bootstrapped funds are necessary.

But the days where a few hundred dollars worth of BTCs turned into an amount that was sufficient to self-fund a bitcoin-related business are probably long gone.  And there was only a relatively few number where that had been the case of what happened anyway.

Shouldn't it follow that if our Bitcoins are worth more we can all imporve our Bitcoin services thereby improving it's reach and appeal after all $20 dollars still buys a Starbucks coffee and personally I think one Bitcoin for a coffee is a crazy high price. 

Technically even nukes can't stop it, so there is that?

OP: Bitcoins will be "worth" more when more people actually use it to trade.

So, teach  people why
 it could be of value for them.

Sort of, except I have to nitpick about definitions. (You'll see why in a moment). For me it's something like this:
Bitcoin has some value in people's minds. They swap dollars and bitcoins for a certain exchange rate. The price of getting a bitcoin is having to part with 5 dollars. Meanwhile, the demand for Bitcoin is a nebulous economic term that graphs the total amount the population is willing to buy at a range of different prices. A "bid wall" is a real-world estimate of demand, except that it stops at the "ask wall" instead of continuing.

If we use those descriptions, we find that the demand is driven by the value. If we want to increase the price, we have to first increase the value, which will then increase the demand. So we can ask: how do we increase the value? And this is what a lot of people have been doing all along -- running bitcoin businesses, creating new products and services, making things easier and cheaper to do than in the dollar/euro/yen economies, and generally kickin' ass. The problem with increasing the demand just by telling people about Bitcoin is that it always starts off with zero value in their minds. It's totally worthless to them... until?? Until they stumble upon one of the many things that makes Bitcoin useful for them.

Remember to consider the volatility of the numéraire. Floating currencies are valued against nothing but other floating currencies. Obvious point, I know, but it's often overlooked.

Man, this is such an easy one...

Even though there is a ~33% inflation rate at the moment, Bitcoin is a limited resource. Simply increase the demand and it will go up in value. How many people do you think know about Bitcoin? A million? There's 7 billion people on the planet who have not had the pleasure of meeting Bitcoin.

Teach your friends, family, and coworkers about it and grow their trust in the system. Share it with them by exchanging with them. Ask them to buy your next beer and give them some Bitcoins for it. Network effect is everything for Bitcoin.

Yes, and we can duplicate bitcoins as we can grow tulips of course...

Oh ye of little faith.

Had the bitcoin ecosystem been a little more mature last June we would have have the ability to sell put options and shorting on Bitcoinica, and that sling shot to $30 would not have occurred.

Hopefully these financial tools are successful and attract even wider use and more competition that will help lessen volatility.

But think about what is happening.   There is all of this innovation occurring but almost none of it is coming from the leaders in the space.  Could a commodities firm add bitcoin as one of its holdings that it trades?  Certainly.  But none do, ... at least not publicly.  Yet we are seeing much of what works in the fiat world replicated, from scratch, from the ground up, so that Bitcoin is afforded the same capabilities.

Put and call options.  MPEx.  Check
Margin trading on a CFD (Contract for Difference) market: Bitcoinica. Check
Fast funds transfer method for fast international exchange of funds:  Redeemable codes from Mt. Gox, CryptoXChange, Bitstamp, and more. Check.
Equities market:  GLBSE and MPEx.  Check
Synthetic instruments: MPEx.
Lending:  ... well,  that's a weak spot yet.

These all fill a need, and will likely be joined with further competition as the market grows.  I don't know at what level all these will cause the exchange rate to rise, but what they will do is to work in concert so that if a rise comes, it won't be just some bubble due to liquidity issues like the last time.

Bitcoin is unlikely to ever increase in value again significantly.  Given four to five years, something bigger and better will get overvalued - a stronger crypto-currency with a client that's usable by more than the smartest 5% of the population, transactions that authenticate fast enough to be meaningful in an actual merchant setting, etc.  Everyone knows that dutch tulips bloom once...

I'm not saying that the price being high is best for everyone, just that if it was higher I'd be richer and build more Bitcoin stuff. I'm probably not the only one like that. In a global sense the price has to be higher for a lot of businesses to join in. A total 'currency base' worth less than $50M isn't going to work for thousands or millions of large Bitcoin businesses. Adoption raises price and price raises adoption possibilities so I'm not saying that we need to pump it up or something in order to get wider adoption, only that the two will come (or not) together.

Somewhat unrelated, I always try to get good deals on labor and labor always tries to get good deals from me.

Dead white geese may be a better investment than most currencies, but Bitcoin is not a currency by design. There is no set limit to geese, tulips, or benjamins, but Bitcoin is finite. Speculating on Bitcoin will increase the value as more people go long. The currency aspect of Bitcoin will be realised when folks actually choose it over debt-based-enslavement currencies.

+1

I do not understand your question. You are apparently rather fresh to bitcoins so you can't be sitting on hundred thousands of early mined coins. So why do you want the price to go up? It's a currency! Unless you happen to sit on a pile of them it's simply an efficient way to translate the value of a good/service you are providing to the value of a good/service you want to acquire. All that matters are:
- liquidity / ease of transfer / cost of carry of the currency
- relative values of services sold vs. acquired

You could do the transfer of value in dead white geese if the exchange was sufficiently liquid and the transactions painless.