I currently can say chosen at random, where they pay more over there and enter because the analysis of the projects ceased to operate at all, running into a Scam is possible in any case
Topic: How to pick best signature campaign - page 29. (Read 7057 times)
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
First, I choose signature campaign which has reputable devs and a great platform (based on whitepaper). Second, I look how approachable, reachable, and active they are in Telegram and other social media platforms they are available. Third and lastly, I tend to choose project that has a reputable and well known bounty manager. 
I think that the amount of information gained in the project could be a criteria for me, not just in the company's white paper but also through friends who are more experienced with good projects, so our beliefs will increase. indeed if it happens so not only a sense of disappointment but our time has been wasted for nothing.
I imagine that you have to locate a more experienced forumchanin and see which organization marks he partakes in, see the tables of this organization, what number of members in it, regardless of whether there are members with a high appraising.
I don't like long bounty signature campaigns very much, it seems to me that there is a high probability to work for several months and in the end get nothing. I'd rather be involved in campaigns that last a few weeks and then wait for removing of signature and the opportunity to move to another bounty.
Well, I don't know what people do. But I myself will always consider these:
- See the manager bounty rank and its track record
- Analyze the ICO if legit or not, trusted or not
- Count the token allocation to the signature campaign and make it into dollars
- See the participation lists whether those are many or few participants (better to choose less)
- Check the rule and regulation, I will choose the signature with approximately 15 posts per week
- See the manager bounty rank and its track record
- Analyze the ICO if legit or not, trusted or not
- Count the token allocation to the signature campaign and make it into dollars
- See the participation lists whether those are many or few participants (better to choose less)
- Check the rule and regulation, I will choose the signature with approximately 15 posts per week
a clear and experienced team is with clubs which criteria should at least be owned in a given campaign bounty. It has become an early proof that the bounty is run by a team of true and certainly the opportunity to be able to provide a large enough will be paid. selective in choosing it should at least be done amid the multitude of scam happens.
as the team may ever have to work for it more people had been made some fake of this result well more study on how is this possible to be choose the best signature campaign even that you look on the successful of the a team the best option also is how legit is this team to provide this for.
Look for campaigns that are allocated at least $ 200,000. In addition, the project should already be traded on the exchange.
Recently, a lot of companies began to last for 2-3 months, and this is already beginning to get used to!
I complete a great deal of research to pick my mark crusades. Mark battles more often than not take quite a while and time is extremely important to me. At last I would prefer not to work lonely. Chiefs are imperative too for me.
For me, dont just pick any of those campaigns, because some other projects are not successful, i am advising you to pick a good bounty manager, a trusted bounty manager.
choose the best signature campaign now is very difficult, because there are campaigns with high ratings. and as a result it turns out a skam, you can not completely trust
You can analyze the project as deeply as possible and try to figure out if there is any weak point of the ICO
It is necessary to check the social activities, the experience of the team behind it .
Signature campaigns happens to be one of the best bounty campaigns when it comes to bounty programmes. One of those things to consider is the aspect of discerning which project is good or not. There are different scam projects at the moment, which one really needs to be careful of, so one will not just go about advertising freely.
a clear and experienced team is with clubs which criteria should at least be owned in a given campaign bounty. It has become an early proof that the bounty is run by a team of true and certainly the opportunity to be able to provide a large enough will be paid. selective in choosing it should at least be done amid the multitude of scam happens.
First of make sure you select a campaign that distributes the majority of its funds to signature users, it should be at least 20%, though sometimes you'll see bounties offering up to 40%. You then needed to look at their caps, if one has a $10m hard cap, and they're offering 2% of this to the signature campaign, this will be more beneficial than another with a $1m hard cap, offering 5%
One thing that you need to know is about their communication to the community because some of the project that promotes the campaign and not making a payment for who do efforts.
I think that the signature campaign should be chosen taqking into account the reviews of those who have already taken part in it and want to join it more. you should be careful with the scam projects
choosing a good bounty is difficult, but I choose a good bounty by looking at the manager, website, team, roadmap, ico price, and sales whether it has reached softcap. usually I choose bounty by looking at it all, but sometimes also my choice is wrong. if not sure, I see the spreadsheet, if many user follow the bounty and the majority of sr or hero member, I will choose the bounty to follow.
Jump to: