Yes, you must look to the participants and read the updates in telegram, in this way, you will be informed about its project and how it is going.
Yes, we need to follow the project. Telegram are convenient and there you can quickly find information. But I'm more to the point that if there are a lot of people in the signature, then there is no point in going there, because the reward decreases 
Topic: How to pick best signature campaign - page 7. (Read 7056 times)
I am guided by managers, I look at the table, how many participants and I participate))) sometimes 3 weeks of participation bring more profit than 2 months of work ...
Pay attention to their peers. If you stay in the forum for a long time, you probably already have friends. Forum members who have been sitting here for a long time can tell you something in private messages.
I'm guided by the timing of the bounty, the amount that is allocated to the company, and the number of participants.
Do I still need to pay attention to the manager and to information about myself and the company. The fact is that they can promise a lot, but I will not be able to pay anything. In any case, there are many such options. 
I'm guided by the timing of the bounty, the amount that is allocated to the company, and the number of participants.
Ideally - the bounty should be with limited duration and with a limited number of participants. And the first, I think is a very important point. Because many bounties indicate in deadlines - before the end of ICO. And recently ICO is very often extended, and accordingly hunters suffer.
I'm guided by the timing of the bounty, the amount that is allocated to the company, and the number of participants.
I generally look their whitepaper, investigate their developers or kinda things like that some might did a another bounty before that i look that to.How many people in their spreadsheets and telegram groups.Sometimes if i have time i look for their ANN topic's posts.Thats how i choose my signature campaigns.
First of all, you need to look at the project and the development team. Next, see how much money is allocated to the bounty company and how many percent is distributed to the desired category. Also note how many members are in your category.
There is no flawless recipe for choosing bounty campaign or ICOs. I just carefully study the project and take into account the bounty manager.
Well, now it is difficult to choose a good project in this market when everything falls , I think you should only choose from proven bounty managers , there are good managers who collect hardcap
The project manager is one of the important thing to choose a signature campaign, but not the main one. Also, it depends on the product and the team.
I always follow my favorite bounty managers and participate in all their projects. Often this is the best choice, because you can be sure of their quality and that you will not be deceived. Maybe there are more options, but in my opinion this is the best choice.
Actually this is I think as a very good method of identify a good project. Good bounty managers them self analysis the project before accepting the job. Therefor following good bounty managers are worthwhile. With this we can also refer other aspects such as rating of the project and project documents as well. 
I always follow my favorite bounty managers and participate in all their projects. Often this is the best choice, because you can be sure of their quality and that you will not be deceived. Maybe there are more options, but in my opinion this is the best choice.
Firstly according to my strategy I don't participate more than 4 weeks, because it is risky in order of participation in scam ICO and there is a gap in receiving money for your job. Working, waiting for calculation, distribution, listing, liquidity. All these factors matter
I advise to use special famous websites who handle with bounty campaigns. Overall these websites do bounty programs analyses and identify really good bounty campaigns
It is necessary to study the project and analyze the idea, team, road map, and if not too lazy - white paper. It is also necessary to choose proven bounty managers.
Yeah, usually a well known campaign manager had do research before starting his job for managing. So, we as participants do not need to bother to investigate again even though it's needed. It's like we can directly participate in their campaign with less worry. 
I just choose a good project, with good ratings. Then I look that with a bounty pool and the total number of people in the signatures, and their rank. Sometimes I look at the manager, because there are so disgusting
Yes, you must look to the participants and read the updates in telegram, in this way, you will be informed about its project and how it is going.
I think, you have to read the technical documentation at first. After that you can conduct some research about team. And also, maybe, it is good to look at the page of a forum of awards to check whether is at people of a problem with a campaign or not 
I just choose a good project, with good ratings. Then I look that with a bounty pool and the total number of people in the signatures, and their rank. Sometimes I look at the manager, because there are so disgusting
My criteria for choosing the Bounty is very simple - I choose those projects that I personally like and cause in me admiration. Also this project must have some kind of know-how, which very effectively solves any existing problem.
In some cases, I choose purely intuitive, but nevertheless for me are indicative factors that are not the rating Bounty manager, as well as the presence of a large number of participants in the official Telegram company.Jump to: