Pages:
Author

Topic: How to recognise a ponzi scheme (Read 6291 times)

zyk
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 101
September 09, 2012, 02:49:39 PM
#45
"Long story short, we hear a story too good to be true... it ain't." - Lt. Aldo Raine

No again ! This will be a never ending story, when even moderators are complicit in sweeping everything under the rug !

Scammers and those abetting them, deserve at least a scammer - tag, or how long will you try to play hide and seek

behind your ridiculous groupthink, that facts should be ignored when compared to "moderators evidence"Huh

Heroesk really Wink

Cheers Zyk

donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
September 09, 2012, 12:57:19 PM
#44
"Long story short, we hear a story too good to be true... it ain't." - Lt. Aldo Raine
zyk
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 101
September 09, 2012, 11:22:52 AM
#43
Important thread. This fiasco we had with BTCST needs to become a prime example and people need to become more active in saying it out loud if they think something is a scam. The Wikipedia article needs to have something on this as well. Bitcoin is especially useful for ponzi operators so this needs special attention.

Of course we can't really get rid of these until we get rid of human greed, which might prove to be a quite difficult task. But what we can do is at least take a more active stance against scams and try to teach people as best we can. That's all we can do, and hope that people get smarter.

No, we can define trust as our most valuable asset and prosecute those, who are proven to have destroyed it and are still destroying it in any way.

Letting them ride in the sunshine scott - free, is being complicit to cover up ppl who are too stupid, too negligent, too lazy, too evil or too ignorant to be entrusted

with other peoples coins.

Cheers Zyk

legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1056
Affordable Physical Bitcoins - Denarium.com
September 04, 2012, 08:33:26 AM
#42
Important thread. This fiasco we had with BTCST needs to become a prime example and people need to become more active in saying it out loud if they think something is a scam. The Wikipedia article needs to have something on this as well. Bitcoin is especially useful for ponzi operators so this needs special attention.

Of course we can't really get rid of these until we get rid of human greed, which might prove to be a quite difficult task. But what we can do is at least take a more active stance against scams and try to teach people as best we can. That's all we can do, and hope that people get smarter.
zyk
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 101
September 03, 2012, 03:55:41 PM
#41
Great how bias works - try this.
Indeed. You need to check YOUR bias. And BTW nice try taking things out of context.

Why do not you disclose your motivation for lying to public like that here? I would also suggest to check dictionary definition of FRAUD and see if it would maybe apply here. Ohh I'll help ya.

High investment returns with little or no risk  --> Nope, huge risk it might all dissapear at a moment's notice.

O Really! Why would it dissapear at moment's notice when Pirate claimed or implied so many times that it is not a ponzi and that all the money will be returned to investors both capital and interest?

FAIL

Unregistered investments. --> Not anonymous, simple internet search reveals more than enough information.

FAIL

Issues with paperwork.  --> No. No paperwork, no issues, but he keeps meticulous records.

Right. I am sure in the context SEC by paperwork meant something else than an accurate tally of who put how much money in. A simple google search would reveal what mentioned "investment prospectus" means, for example.

FAIL

3 out of six and two other "hits" are not uncommon in legitimate businesses with "unlicensed" typical of bitcoin.

BULLSHIT!


The SEC is watching porno movies and not reading bitcoin magzines yet Wink

Cheers Zyk
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1002
July 09, 2012, 06:22:52 PM
#40
It's a ponzi scheme. Ponzi schemes unravel slowly, since the investors (victims) tend to be very loyal. At 7%/week, even if no one new invests and everyone who has already invested just withdraws their profits, it takes 14 weeks to go through all their money. Usually most victims reinvest and many new victims come in, so the scheme can go on for an extended time.

Loyal, tell me about it! I have a "FUD aura", I get shouted at the moment I touch threads related to BS&T.

They're taking me face-on with such hostility, I wonder how they can take the shutdown. My guess is, they don't have any more info than we do, only sold their opinion for the holy 7%. Probably, they were in early and ended up in the black, now helping to herd up newcomers to feed on. Yea, I'm not done with these people.
hero member
Activity: 501
Merit: 500
July 09, 2012, 12:18:55 AM
#39
It is possible that pirate from BS&T is Dread Pirate Roberts from Silk Road.  This would explain why he's got to keep so quiet about what he's doing with the invested coins.

That would mean it's not a Ponzi; it's simply profiting from the Silk Road mixer service.  Assume that that this is the case.  It would mean that BS&T is not a scam.  It doesn't mean it's risk free though.

That couldn't possibly generate 3000% yearly returns.

It's a ponzi scheme. Ponzi schemes unravel slowly, since the investors (victims) tend to be very loyal. At 7%/week, even if no one new invests and everyone who has already invested just withdraws their profits, it takes 14 weeks to go through all their money. Usually most victims reinvest and many new victims come in, so the scheme can go on for an extended time.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1001
-
July 07, 2012, 12:43:44 AM
#38
http://www.fbi.gov/scams-safety/fraud/

“Ponzi’ Schemes

Quote
“Ponzi” schemes promise high financial returns or dividends not available through traditional investments. Instead of investing the funds of victims, however, the con artist pays “dividends” to initial investors using the funds of subsequent investors. The scheme generally falls apart when the operator flees with all of the proceeds or when a sufficient number of new investors cannot be found to allow the continued payment of “dividends.”

This type of fraud is named after its creator—Charles Ponzi of Boston, Massachusetts. In the early 1900s, Ponzi launched a scheme that guaranteed investors a 50 percent return on their investment in postal coupons. Although he was able to pay his initial backers, the scheme dissolved when he was unable to pay later investors.

Tips for Avoiding Ponzi Schemes:

Be careful of any investment opportunity that makes exaggerated earnings claims.
Exercise due diligence in selecting investments and the people with whom you invest—in other words, do your homework.
Consult an unbiased third party—like an unconnected broker or licensed financial advisor—before investing.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1001
-
July 07, 2012, 12:37:08 AM
#37
here is what KPMG has published as list of red flags:

http://www.kpmg.com/ca/en/whatwedo/specialinterests/at-risk-magazine/pages/ponzischemes%E2%80%93howtorecognizethem.aspx

Quote
Red Flags – Possible Ponzi Scheme

Higher than normal investment returns
No taxes on returns
Little or no stated risk
Opportunity spreads by word of mouth
Groups targeted by affiliation, ethnic, or social groupings
Appearance of “exclusive” opportunity – you need an “in” to invest
Stated or implied time constraint to invest
Mastermind is often known as a “guru”, “master,” or “genius”
Blind faith – investors lack understanding of investments
Little to no paperwork documenting investments.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
July 07, 2012, 12:32:01 AM
#36

BULLSHIT!

Wow - you really are angry.  I provided a counter, and there is this angry, shouty person on the other side.  I wasn't necessarily arguing for or against, but putting a point of view - and one that was deliberately at the other extreme of the quoted post.  That you can not see this for what it is (and the comedic juxtaposition) is a worry.  

(Starfish leaves Vladimir to save the world and gets on with something else.)
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
July 06, 2012, 11:45:38 PM
#35
I can feel the tension building in this thread....

I need some popcorn  Grin Grin Grin
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1001
-
July 06, 2012, 11:33:31 PM
#34
Great how bias works - try this.
Indeed. You need to check YOUR bias. And BTW nice try taking things out of context.

Why do not you disclose your motivation for lying to public like that here? I would also suggest to check dictionary definition of FRAUD and see if it would maybe apply here. Ohh I'll help ya.

High investment returns with little or no risk  --> Nope, huge risk it might all dissapear at a moment's notice.

O Really! Why would it dissapear at moment's notice when Pirate claimed or implied so many times that it is not a ponzi and that all the money will be returned to investors both capital and interest?

FAIL

Unregistered investments. --> Not anonymous, simple internet search reveals more than enough information.

FAIL

Issues with paperwork.  --> No. No paperwork, no issues, but he keeps meticulous records.

Right. I am sure in the context SEC by paperwork meant something else than an accurate tally of who put how much money in. A simple google search would reveal what mentioned "investment prospectus" means, for example.

FAIL

3 out of six and two other "hits" are not uncommon in legitimate businesses with "unlicensed" typical of bitcoin.

BULLSHIT!
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
July 06, 2012, 06:17:37 PM
#33
Quote

Let's just see how alleged Pirate ponzi fares on SEC check list:

High investment returns with little or no risk  --> Check. 3000% per year, it does not get any better than this.

Overly consistent returns. --> Check

Unregistered investments. --> Check, run by anonymous Pirate no less.

Unlicensed sellers.  --> Check, a network of intermediaries who take a cut for promoting and proxying it

Issues with paperwork.  --> Check. No paperwork, no issues.  Wink

Secretive and/or complex strategies.  -> Check, big secret to avoid competition, inconsistent claims on what it can be, one day it is genius trading and arbitrage, the other day it is some mysterious USD denominated investments, another day it is alien supplied mining tech and time travel.

Difficulty receiving payments. -> Nope. No difficulties reported so far.

Great how bias works - try this.

Let's just see how alleged Pirate ponzi fares on SEC check list:

High investment returns with little or no risk  --> Nope, huge risk it might all dissapear at a moment's notice.

Overly consistent returns. --> Check - like most businesses, you smooth out returns by using a float (working capital), that's how banks offer fixed rate deposits.

Unregistered investments. --> Not anonymous, simple internet search reveals more than enough information.

Unlicensed sellers.  --> Check, but then 99%+ of bitcoin people are unlicensed.

Issues with paperwork.  --> No. No paperwork, no issues, but he keeps meticulous records.

Secretive and/or complex strategies.  -> Check, big secret to avoid competition, just like most businesses with IP to protect.

3 out of six and two other "hits" are not uncommon in legitimate businesses with "unlicensed" typical of bitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1531
yes
July 06, 2012, 07:23:57 AM
#32
If people would lose faith, they would not have lost that many (worthless BTC). On the contrary, the fact that they would consider themselves 'scammed' would prove BTC's enduring value. The same would apply to outsiders (if you lost something with no value, why are you crying about it? Apparently, you lost something that you valued very much).

Happing investing to all  Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1001
-
July 06, 2012, 07:23:00 AM
#31
from http://www.sec.gov/answers/ponzi.htm

Quote
What are some Ponzi scheme “red flags”?

Many Ponzi schemes share common characteristics. Look for these warning signs:

High investment returns with little or no risk. Every investment carries some degree of risk, and investments yielding higher returns typically involve more risk. Be highly suspicious of any “guaranteed” investment opportunity.

Overly consistent returns. Investments tend to go up and down over time, especially those seeking high returns. Be suspect of an investment that continues to generate regular, positive returns regardless of overall market conditions.

Unregistered investments. Ponzi schemes typically involve investments that have not been registered with the SEC or with state regulators. Registration is important because it provides investors with access to key information about the company’s management, products, services, and finances.

Unlicensed sellers. Federal and state securities laws require investment professionals and their firms to be licensed or registered. Most Ponzi schemes involve unlicensed individuals or unregistered firms.

Secretive and/or complex strategies. Avoiding investments you don’t understand or for which you can’t get complete information is a good rule of thumb.

Issues with paperwork. Ignore excuses regarding why you can’t review information about an investment in writing, and always read an investment’s prospectus or disclosure statement carefully before you invest. Also, account statement errors may be a sign that funds are not being invested as promised.

Difficulty receiving payments. Be suspicious if you don’t receive a payment or have difficulty cashing out your investment. Keep in mind that Ponzi scheme promoters sometimes encourage participants to “roll over” promised payments by offering even higher investment returns.


Let's just see how alleged Pirate ponzi fares on SEC check list:

High investment returns with little or no risk  --> Check. 3000% per year, it does not get any better than this.

Overly consistent returns. --> Check

Unregistered investments. --> Check, run by anonymous Pirate no less.

Unlicensed sellers.  --> Check, a network of intermediaries who take a cut for promoting and proxying it

Issues with paperwork.  --> Check. No paperwork, no issues.  Wink

Secretive and/or complex strategies.  -> Check, big secret to avoid competition, inconsistent claims on what it can be, one day it is genius trading and arbitrage, the other day it is some mysterious USD denominated investments, another day it is alien supplied mining tech and time travel.

Difficulty receiving payments. -> Nope. No difficulties reported so far.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 502
July 06, 2012, 07:17:56 AM
#30
It is possible that pirate from BS&T is Dread Pirate Roberts from Silk Road.  This would explain why he's got to keep so quiet about what he's doing with the invested coins.

That would mean it's not a Ponzi; it's simply profiting from the Silk Road mixer service.  Assume that that this is the case.  It would mean that BS&T is not a scam.  It doesn't mean it's risk free though.

Now, the feds will be looking to shut down Silk Road, and it's certainly not beyond their ken to make this same potential link as we have.  pirateat is leaving IP fingerprints around the place for BS&T... enough for a fed to physically find him (they're good at finding people from IP addresses).

That will then let them shut down Silk Road, but more importantly, will leave all the BS&T investors with no access to their investment.

The other possibility is that it's a Ponzi.

Not sure either of those have a good risk profile.
legendary
Activity: 1896
Merit: 1353
July 06, 2012, 06:47:21 AM
#29
Although I have nothing invested in BS&T, the whole ordeal worries me a bit. What if it turns out that clients don't get their funds back? In that case bitcoin will have to take another hit, and price will go down, which also hurts my bitcoin savings. I really hope we'll see some clarification soon..

Why would Bitcoin take another hit?
A few people get scammed. End of story. No big deal for Bitcoin.


I'd say bad publicity, and perhaps more people losing faith in the credibility of bitcoin.

Scam victims may indeed lose faith in the credibility of Bitcoin. So what? Why should we bother about them losing faith?
If people are stupid enough to invest in what looks like a Ponzi scheme, it will be difficult to teach them the difference between the currency itself and the various scams they can fall for.

Let these people lose faith; a bit of natural selection will not hurt the community.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1001
-
July 06, 2012, 06:31:14 AM
#28
There is a number of possible scenarios.

If we assume that it is a Ponzi and the only economic activity of Pirate was steadily selling some fraction of invested bitcoins. Unnatural bitcoin price stability lately could be an indirect evidence of such sustained sale pressure. In this case the sustained sale pressure will disappear and this might be bullish for bitcoin.

As ribuck has mentioned above this could be "there is no such thing as bad publicity" event AKA
"Shumer syndrome".

The default would produce lots of comedy value for 4chan and SA goons, most likely.

The default would also separate the wheat from the chaff on this forum. Not big deal really, who cares.

The default would potentially bring great educational value to some.

The default would make investors much more careful about their DD, which is only a good news for investment seeking companies that produce less than 3000% ROI.
donator
Activity: 826
Merit: 1039
July 06, 2012, 06:15:30 AM
#27
I'd say bad publicity, and perhaps more people losing faith in the credibility of bitcoin.
Any publicity is probably good publicity. Bitcoin survived the MtGox hack, bitcoin survived the MyBitcoin scam, and a few others. Bitcoin will also survive the inevitable end of Pirate's operation.

The people who will suffer won't be bitcoiners as a whole; just those who "invested".
hero member
Activity: 614
Merit: 500
July 06, 2012, 06:04:45 AM
#26
Although I have nothing invested in BS&T, the whole ordeal worries me a bit. What if it turns out that clients don't get their funds back? In that case bitcoin will have to take another hit, and price will go down, which also hurts my bitcoin savings. I really hope we'll see some clarification soon..

Why would Bitcoin take another hit?
A few people get scammed. End of story. No big deal for Bitcoin.


I'd say bad publicity, and perhaps more people losing faith in the credibility of bitcoin.
Pages:
Jump to: