Let's just see how alleged Pirate ponzi fares on SEC check list:
High investment returns with little or no risk --> Check. 3000% per year, it does not get any better than this.
Overly consistent returns. --> Check
Unregistered investments. --> Check, run by anonymous Pirate no less.
Unlicensed sellers. --> Check, a network of intermediaries who take a cut for promoting and proxying it
Issues with paperwork. --> Check. No paperwork, no issues.
Secretive and/or complex strategies. -> Check, big secret to avoid competition, inconsistent claims on what it can be, one day it is genius trading and arbitrage, the other day it is some mysterious USD denominated investments, another day it is alien supplied mining tech and time travel.
Difficulty receiving payments. -> Nope. No difficulties reported so far.
Great how bias works - try this.
Let's just see how alleged Pirate ponzi fares on SEC check list:High investment returns with little or no risk --> Nope, huge risk it might all dissapear at a moment's notice.
Overly consistent returns. --> Check - like most businesses, you smooth out returns by using a float (working capital), that's how banks offer fixed rate deposits.
Unregistered investments. --> Not anonymous, simple internet search reveals more than enough information.
Unlicensed sellers. --> Check, but then 99%+ of bitcoin people are unlicensed.
Issues with paperwork. --> No. No paperwork, no issues, but he keeps meticulous records.
Secretive and/or complex strategies. -> Check, big secret to avoid competition, just like most businesses with IP to protect.
3 out of six and two other "hits" are not uncommon in legitimate businesses with "unlicensed" typical of bitcoin.