Topic: How to tell which mod actually deletes a post? (Read 385 times)

I just explained it to you stop pretending you didnt see it.

I just told you what i said the exact wording will not change whether it was on topic or not.

Just start to present your case so that I can destroy it when I get back from my swimming and tennis.

If you can't follow the extremely loose rules of this forum then you can only blame yourself. Create a new thread on an appropriate board, post your shit there, done. As it stands now, you can't even be bothered to show it here, you just want to bitch and moan about it. Shows how little you actually care about all that DT stuff. Mostly it's just about you being at the center of attention. Well, enjoy it, if only for today.

It is relevant. I say you are reporting posts to silence the truth being revealed about your merit cycling and DT inclusion pals. You say you are not guilty but got it deleted for it being off topic.

I just told you what I said in response to huge black womans post and relating to the OP it is clearly on topic. Explain how it is off topic now. You just said bla bla bla i don't like you telling people the trust about the background of my friends. I don't want people to keep hearing that the pharmacist set up a puppet account called Huge Black Woman to spam his sig for more btc dust whilst filling the board with racist trolling.

So why do you not want the truth about this to be stated when he is in a thread giving his opinions on why essentially he should be given a position of trust by his pals like you and there is no need for an election process?  that seems very likely does it not? more than your concern for it being off topic when right here and now you can not even build a case for it being off topic or irrelevant?

I will await your in details of how you say it is off topic and that you are happy to acknowledge you support for a position of trust
1. a proven liar
2. a proven and self confessed trust abuser
3. a proven sneaky sock puppet greedy racist trolling sig spammer.

your inclusions and your actions are there in black and white.... you include them on dt, you merit cycle with them, and you all   mostly exclude the same persons and want to silence any mention of this?

seems all there in black and white

None of this is relevant. Your opinion about your post means jack shit. If your post was reported and a mod thought it's off topic - it got deleted. You can repost it and try your luck again, since you're clearly not interested in changing your behavior. Or you can keep whining, which is quite fun to watch and also benefits the forum since you're now confined to these two threads and can't spread your BS elsewhere.

so that is the reason... i mentioned some on topic and relevant facts regarding the proven wrong doing of one of your DT pals and merit cycling pals?  

yes i noticed that but that does not mean it is off topic nor does it mean it is not relevant, nor does it mean that I should not be able to respond to a direct false accusation and personal attack. I did not complain or report his post so stop being a chicken shit snitchy bitch and quit stalking me you creepy little twerp.

You could use quotes. Or a screenshot. Too much work?


I stated the reason multiple times, you can't possibly be that thick, can you?


Even there you didn't show what you're complaining about. You just posted more of your ramblings. You're really making it more complicated than it needs to be.

I told you what I posted I am not reposting it word for word because I know some scum sucking dirt bag like you will push for some scammy temp ban for reposting deleted material. The state the board is in it would probably wash too.

Do you deny that is what I posted? and that is what you reported? if so then state the reason you reported it you cant be that dumb to have forgotten the reason surely.

Let's see on the other thread that you just insisted that I open when there is closer examination of huge black womans post and then my own reply.

You didn't even show the post so you didn't "demonstrate" anything, just babbled about your grievance.

Defecation? anyway you are little. 

There was no rule violation as I just demonstrated. Present the rule. Present the example of the violation. You can not therefore I call false accusation.

I just demonstrated how it was both on topic and relevant to you. I see no rebuttal except some observable double standards blathering and excuses.

If it's self moderated thread, it was deleted by op, otherwise moderator/global moderators, their names can be seen on sub boards.

Unfortunately, forum wasn't kind enough to directly show who deleted your post 

Defamation. I'm not "little". Also I can't delete your posts. I report rule violations and it's not really my fault that you can't be bothered to follow the rules.

You are still explaining/excusing yourself.. so there is not need as yet to start the other thread.

Although your explanation is bullshit and observably double standards and does not detail at all WHY it is off topic and not relevant. It just states that you personally believe (others but not yourself) should not bring in a persons proven history to a post even if it is totally on topic and clearly relevant and they have just posted false accusations and insults about you.

It is clear you have no explanation only a bunch of excuses that make you appear stupid and as having double standards. Both of which are obviously hard to disguise anyway in your situation.

I am enjoying watching you post your usual standard of double standards junk that makes zero sense.

I am also waiting to bitch slap you with this thread everytime you bring someones history into your replies.

Confessing in public you took me off ignore so that you could get my posts deleted is completely crazy. Disgusting little turd.

Wow, it sounds like I'm a truly horrible person.


I had you on ignore and since you don't really care about anything forum-related that doesn't stroke your narcissism - you didn't see me.

---

Your hour was up like three hours ago. Seems like you lied again. Not nice.

whiny to idiots like such moon = legitimate questions

Let me spell it out to you because as i have demonstrated in the merit cycling debates you are a full on dip shit and need to start making ludicrous claims to hold on to your side of any argument

1. my post and the details regarding the facts of the pharmacists background are ON TOPIC and RELEVANT to
a. his claim my views on the elections, and dt are incorrect and that makes me a baffoon
b. his claim that the dt should remain as it is because it is unworkable to try and please everyone and it works best as it can right now
c. the op that is questioning the current DT system vs elections.

2. now any relevant back ground pertinent to the OP or a statement made regarding the OP must be made on a separate  board and not mentioned on thread or it will be deleted. Who says?? you suchmoron??

You are more of a dirty snitcher for minor infractions than a whiner that is likely because at present you enjoy some pseudo power and favour here and have little to whine about since you get to instruct theymos to remove merits, mods to delete posts, display openly double standards with no comeback, support liars, suspected extortionists,  and proven trust abusers and proven greedy sneaky sig spamming troll puppets for DT positions and cycle your merit source loot. Not much to complain about I guess at the moment.

I wonder when you will break down again and start spewing out ludicrous statements. I'm glad you're back. Where have you been of late? I see minimal posting in meta from you?

If you think any of my posts are off topic please report them and watch me create a million whiny-ass threads about that... or not.

LOL so here we have it. Suchmoon says no more mentioning a persons proven dirty background if they are her pals and colluders. I see her mentioning everyone elses background when it suits her. Og, QS, TS and anyone else gets their pasts or her variation of their pasts dug up when she starts colliding with them in threads.

However, even when a suchmoon colluder pal makes invalid and incorrect claims on your personal views and your character you must not present facts to demonstrate why those views regarding the topic and yourself could certainly be invalidated and propose obvious and observable events from their past to substantiate your views.

I see.   Well let's look through your post history shall we and start making the same comparisons and have them all deleted shall we?

I've missed you actually. I have forgotten what a last word imbecile you are for demonstrating your own double standards

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49728142

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49728054

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49724251

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49713758

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49491374

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49340042

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49336299


more on the way all need to be reported and deleted for being background - - not allowed..

So now facts that are obviously relevant and important to refute false accusations and claims regarding the specific topic are not allowed. Especially if they reveal proven dirt on suchmoons pals.

As a heart attack.


If you start presenting everyone's "background" in every thread you'll be derailing the whole forum with that shit. Come to think of it, that's what you're doing most of the time. The correct way to make such character complaints would be to create your own threads or use the ones that already exist for that purpose.


Knock yourself out. Use binoculars for the extra pervy touch.

Are you serious?

The pharmacist aka huge black woman the person who got busted for sig spamming racist trolling under a sock puppet to earn more btc dust for spamming an extra sig and even then was so greedy got caught trying to leave one campaign for a higher paying one starts making false accusations about me out of the blue.


I was alerted to this accusation about myself directly so

1. I told the truth that he was busted for being sneaky and greedy and sig spamming under a puppet account for extra btc dust

2. i told the truth that when i asked him his greatest achievement here he told me it was getting on a highly paid sig campaign

3. I pointed out inlight of this why I disagreed with his views on the DT selection and elections and on myself being a baffoon voicing incorrect  stupid unworkable views ( can't please everyone argument).. and why he may be making these false claims.

It is obviously on topic because he is commenting on the elections and the trust system and actually telling people my views are incorrect and that I am a baffoon and his views that it is all working perfectly are the correct views?this  is of course likely motivated by the fact that even such a person of proven untrustworthy repute as him and his master lauda can still be given powers of trust and rewarded for essentially gaming the systems.

So suchmoons you say he huge black woman.. can say my views are incorrect and I look like a baffoon (all unsubstantiated bullshit from a proven untrustworthy scumbag) and I have to have my post deleted for presenting facts as to his background and why he is saying this about me and the lack of need for any changes to the DT system and elections are not required or even worth debating??

Now explain how it is off topic and non relevant?

I await your explanation.

It is clearly just an attempt to silence facts that demonstrate your DT inclusion pal and merit fan and receiver cycling pal the pharmacist is clearly a sneaky and greedy and untrustworthy person.

This by your own definition suchmoon makes you untrustworthy ...again from yet another source.

You are starting to look very shady indeed. I see you colluding with all manner of observably untrustworthy individuals. You need to be watched very closely.

I already told you. The "case" was that the post was off topic, nothing to do with elections, personal attack. I don't have the exact wording because reports aren't visible to me.


You're right about one thing. I don't care much about your rambling except when you break the rules. If you think some other post was off topic too - report it.


You can replace it yourself and skip the drama. Despite what you're insinuating, moderators don't take orders from me.

Ha so you are refusing to present it now?  what a chicken shit piece of snitching dirt you are.

1 hour then I will start the thread that demonstrates just how you are trying to silence a facts based reply to a false accusation that one of your "circle" of merit pals and DT inclusions made.

tick tock bring to me now your case.... copy and paste the "case" you sent to the mod.

I will title it something like..

suchmoon instructs mod to delete facts and observable events rebutting false claims and accusations from his pal huge black woman.

this actually is not as bad as the lauda incident but it nicely lends itself to being very similar in nature.

seems like a person trying to cover up the proven wrong doing of their friends and DT inclusions and merit pals to me.

Post the pharmacists aka huge black womans post about myself and then my own post in reply then explain how mine is off topic and deserves to be deleted

I challenge you to do it right now. If not then you have no case that you care to present. If you can easily prove mine should be deleted and his left there then fair enough.

If not I want you to message the mod and have it replaced.