you are wrong. You are assuming i'm up to no good without giving me a chance to state my case. it is easy to setup on your pedestal and declare everything a scam. Also, you do not know my mindset. you don't know why i want to have a positive trust, and you do not know what my intention is. You are just assuming based on a prior precedence, which is not fair to me. But i concede the point. please show me how i can correct this and establish my reputation in what you deem as being "the right way", since ive broken some infallible sacred law of bitcointalk by attempting to establish a reputation of a trustworthy bitcointalk user. my only intention here is to sell my coding services, but no one will trust someone with zero feedback.
I'm not wrong and I'm not assuming you're up to no good. You're probably not, but you are being really naive. I know your mindset because you have stated it several times - you wanted trust to appear trustworthy and that in itself makes any trust you may have recieved worthless. You wanted to buy trust thus making it untrustworthy and essentially fraudulent by your own admission. If you want to gain trust go about it the same way everyone else does: they build it over time via genuine trades, they don't just try quickly buy it for $5. Someone even with 100 positive feedbacks for a 100 $5 Paypal trades wouldn't exactly be 'trusted' either. All that proves is you can be trusted with $5, doesn't mean you want scam as soon as someone sends you $10.
Just noticed that some retard left me a negative feedback because i posted the publicly available information about a registered domain's owner.
How the hell some random can leave me such feedback over a post, not even a trade....
Well I cannot even see it.
you're using multiple accounts to post information ?
It's there if you go his profile.