Topic: How Will Investing Help the Economy of a Country (Read 1331 times)

That is correct many investment can add values to the country's economy - and that too depends on the government of that country
In my country - government is very corrupt and it can only save their face - they don't care for their people and it brings chaos and trouble only

Investing is a tricky thing many people make investment to become rich- and they end up bankrupt.
So one should be very careful while making such decision.
In this time of inflation - you are right there are different ways to grow money but sometime people just want to have have lavish infrastructure that they are growing.

I have heard lots of investigating stories - those which are gone wrong
People invest money for the sake of profit - but sometime they end up with mental stress and scam - like I did just recently

Not for now. It would not help the country's economy due to its decentralized status and unrecognized by the majority of states. The situation is always uncertain in the crypto market, which would result in a high risk of investment. But I can't predict anything precisely for the future. Let's see what's next.

Investing is considered so important nowadays that very few people make money sitting still without moving through investing, and I agree that money should be invested into something of value and that is something that is always really good every year.

So that there will be no decrease in asset value if something invested is something that is always targeted by many people every year, close examples are land and buildings that are ready for use. But because the crypto space can also provide extraordinary things that satisfy investors, then trying to put money into Bitcoin is also a solution that is not bad in my opinion at this point.

What do you have to say about the money printed by CBN that is idle and brought out at any time to increase inflation by numbers? No matter whether the policy set cannot remove the old money in supply, don't you think they are contributing sabotage to the same economy people are investing in?

---

The only places I think countries don't usually fail in investments are education and health, no amount of money spent on education and health is delusional, one way or the other, the country will always benefit from it and will even attract foreigners to them.

There's no how a country can't afford to embark onnan investment because that's the only thing it has to fall back on after having challenges in financial economy, but what we should be more partinent about is the type of investment made upon, eome investment are without doubt a waste of time because they eventually turns liability in future, but before a country can start to venture into such investment, there must be adequate preparation out in place that will also contribute to the growth of its economy through the investment plans, the multi diverted asset of investment that is trending allover is the bitcoin network and a good fortune can spring forth from its adoption for an investment.

Investment is the foundation for the growth of an economy. Money shouldn’t sit idle and must be invested in something that appreciates in value with time. All major economies are boosted by investments in various sectors. It not only helps the economy but also helps individuals to secure their future.

The "how" part is not really that confusing, you invest, build a factory, hire a thousand people then you move on and invest and build another factory and hire another thousand people and you keep doing that constantly, in a nation with low inflation and no recession and low interest rates, it's smarter to grow your business to make more money, but right now we have high inflation and high interest rates and even recession which means that putting your money in the bank will make it go up faster compared to spending it to grow your business.

That's my personal opinion of course, doesn't mean that it's true, which is why I feel like the best thing to do would be growing now, and be ready when the time comes.

Surely not investment doors or opportunities are open for all kinds of people like the poor and rich, they all have specifications for what investment they can take part in likewise the educated class. The government runs investment programs for poor even the less privileged and physically impede classes and this is the right way to organize and run a government, if done this way there is no way that this won't contribute to the total income and well being of the country's economy. Example there are loans that are available for rich and poor depending on the capacity to attract those loans.

In reality it is like that and we can't just close our eyes,
and it actually makes us realize how important an education is because if we don't have it we won't know anything,
even so but the good news is that nowadays more and more people are literate with investment

That's why some investors are scammed. They want quick return money and this doesn't help the economy.

Investment can have both positive and negative impart on the economy. This depend on the type of investment. Not all investment are good. Some investment may enrich few people rendering amass in poverty. Example of such investment is investing in a Ponzi scheme like MMM. This have a negative impart on the economy as multiples will be scammed.
Investing in a good business can seriously improve the economy as this

1. Creat more job opportunities
2. Increase government internal revenue through tax.
3. Develop the community where the business is established.

Therefore, good investment will always have great impart on economy.

The goal of the state to open the door to investment certainly hopes to make prosperity for citizens, unfortunately not all investments can help the economy of the poor because most poor people do not have education so they cannot participate with investors.

regarding freelancing and around it. In our country (Ukraine), around 2015, tax legislation was modified, and they made it possible to become a self-employed worker in many areas (there were many restrictions and conditions before). We call it, in a simplified way, "an individual entrepreneur." What happened in the end:
1. Taxes - 3 tax schemes. Differs in annual turnover, and rates. It looks like this: either 3% of turnover at 20% VAT (applied to goods, but almost not applicable to services), or 5% of turnover. Plus flat income tax, now about $100 per quarter (3 months). The annual turnover limit under such a simplified scheme, for example for the IT sector, is approximately $120,000 per year. That's $10,000 a month, of which about $500 comes from taxes.
2. Tax reporting - extremely simplified. Once a month, quarter, half a year and a year, a notification comes from the Tax Inspectorate, in the taxpayer's personal account you automatically generate (if you need to make manual adjustments) reports, sign an EDS and .. EVERYTHING

I work in the IT sector, so I will talk about this area and the results: a huge number of both private specialists and companies hiring private entrepreneurs have appeared, who began to receive completely "white" income and pay taxes. Particularly strongly developed - software development outsourcing, service companies within the framework of IT services. For several years, Ukraine has entered the top 10 leaders in outsourcing development, full-fledged large software companies have appeared, which brought huge funds to Ukraine.
It has become extremely easy to work under contracts with Western companies, and indeed with any companies around the world.

It makes sense because freelancer works for people outside of the nation, gets paid, and then spends that money inside the nation. Let's say you are in a south Asian nation, like Vietnam, you may dislike them because of the history but you end up working for an American, and then when you get paid, 500 bucks is nothing to them, and American pays you 500 dollars, you take it, you pay your landlord, your bills, your food, your fun, everything from there and suddenly Vietnam economy is 500 dollars bigger thanks to that.

If you have millions of people working like that, working to get money from other nations, that would be very very profitable for everyone. Plus it helps drop the unemployment rate as well.

Investing is indeed a great job for everyone to do. But everyone also needs to look at the good things for investing because not everything that exists today can be very good as an investment. For example if you invest your money in Bitcoin, Gold, Land, Housing, Company shares and also some good properties. Then you have the opportunity to get a bigger profit and the effect or impact you feel will also be extraordinary, as well as other people who do the same thing. Thus, the general economic cycle will obviously occur more vigorously and wisely.

It will definitely help.  This money could then be used for infrastructure, which in turn would support constituents and could support industry.  You get infrastructure and industry in order or improved, the economy will follow.

Of course, if most of the society earns a good income, the country will have a good economic situation. But if many people are jobless and earn a low income, the country will have a burden to help people's finances. In my country, the government has tried to provide as many as employment and campaign to improve independent business. One of the possible independent businesses is an investment. So, investing surely helps the economy level of a country.

As long as there are investors that keep coming, whether it's on a particular sector or many, it should make that sector stable and great in terms of cash flow.
These investments will generate jobs and profits which will go to the economy of that country where that investment is flowing. I think it's not that just positive for those in particular like you've mentioned in production but, there are other investments where it's helping not only the economy but also people that are unnoticed.

What investing really does is potentially help your country to keep more of it's wealth "in house" as it were. If you are American and buy shares in American companies, you help to keep all the earnings and subsequent profits within the borders of the USA if you live there. It gives you more say over what direction the company can take, at least in theory (but you would need to become a major shareholder to have any actual influence). The alternative is your companies being potentially taken over, useful parts like intellectual property and technology can be taken overseas which might make it harder for your country to be successful in the longer term.