Topic: How will SOPA in the US impact bitcoin globally if it passes? (Read 3153 times)

The value may go up, but thats assuming demand isnt crushed by prohibition.

One way for bitcoin to survive and thrive is to become successful in black markets.  In that case it would become more expensive absolutely.  However us westerners belie our ignorance by speaking in generalities and absolutes (implicitly referring to our own society).  There are other places on the planet that will not pass laws regarding bitcoin for quite a while, maybe at all.

Those places where bitcoin becomes widely used will see massive benifits.  Notably bitcoin is less of a threat to authority in nations with trade surplus and little to no government debt.

Declaring BTC illegal will make it many times more interesting to people. Everything the government forbids, increases -fold in value (like drugs).

The point of SOPA isn't to stop online piracy (oh you thought the Patriot Act was patriotic?), it's to give legal authority for the government to censor online content.

Whether or not the content being censored is pirated or violates copyright law will eventually become irrelevant.  The government will just start censoring content it doesn't like.

http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2011/02/04/use-of-patriot-act-power-for-drug-war-skyrockets/

There will be no due process, no hearings, and little to no oversight.

Now that we understand what SOPA is, can we discuss its possible impact on bitcoin?


In my opinion, by the time the government realizes bitcoin will be a problem, it will be too late to stop it. However that does not mean they wont try.  They will most likely go after exchanges based in the US first, and probably scare any major retailers into dropping the currency.  This could have a dramatic effect, not on bitcoin, but on the US economy.

More bitcoin friendly economies will realize dramatic benefits from the currency and it will reach some level of equilibrium until the western nations begin to fully implode.  It will be interesting to see if bitcoin will fill the vacuum left by the USD, or if the powers that be will enforce bitcoin prohibition and force a new centrally controlled currency on the populace.

HAHA touché!

So then they're not much different than the RIAA companies?

SOPA aims to not only allow the US to censor DNS records, but also halt payment processing for websites profiting from piracy. (much like financially strangling Wikileaks by prohibiting donations through Visa)  Websites currently charging for pirated content will likely then circumvent such restrictions by offering pirated content in exchange for Bitcoin instead.  This move will then focus attention by the MPAA and gov't enforcers on Bitcoin.  US-based exchanges will be the first target.

The artists never received that money.  You'd have been better off pirating without paying allofmp3.  You were simply paying Russian criminals to send you the pirated goods.

How was allofmp3.com a scam (to consumers)?  Back when I was feeling guilty about not paying for stuff, I bought from them, and every time I bought an mp3, I received it, it was legit, it worked.
 
What was the scam?

I can never understand what the hell these people are trying to say... Would the bitcoin network need to do this, if so how:

(b) Denying U.S. Financial Support of Sites Dedicated to Theft of U.S. Property-

(1) PAYMENT NETWORK PROVIDERS- Except in the case of an effective counter notification pursuant to paragraph (5), a payment network provider shall take technically feasible and reasonable measures, as expeditiously as possible, but in any case within 5 days after delivery of a notification under paragraph (4), that are designed to prevent, prohibit, or suspend its service from completing payment transactions involving customers located within the United States and the Internet site, or portion thereof, that is specified in the notification under paragraph (4).

...

(3) DESIGNATED AGENT-

(A) IN GENERAL- Each payment network provider and each Internet advertising service shall designate an agent to receive notifications described in paragraph (4), by making available through its service, including on its Web site in a location accessible to the public, and by providing to the Copyright Office, substantially the following:

(i) The name, address, phone number, and electronic mail address of the agent.

(ii) Other contact information that the Register of Copyrights considers appropriate.

(B) DIRECTORY OF AGENTS- The Register of Copyrights shall maintain and make available to the public for inspection, including through the Internet, in electronic format, a current directory of agents designated under subparagraph (A).

section 103 part b

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h112-3261

http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2011/12/seasonal-flame-bait.html says the piracy target is a diversion


Doesn't lessen your argument, though.

Also: look at bitcointorrentz.com. Dunno if they're pirates, but people _do_ pay for downloads.

How would SOPA lead to exchanges being blocked by banks? What is the connection?

The most relevant aspect of this is Namecoin which would then have a direct economic stimulus to accelerate its adoption.

It's more relevant to Namecoin than Bitcoin IMHO.

I really don't think not paying is part of the definition of piracy (even though it may be a large part of most pirates behavior).  Not being authorized to have the content (which is usually done by paying) is what makes you a pirate.  If you pay some random bootlegger at the flea market for a copy of a movie, you can't claim the movie is legit because you paid someone for it.

Customers? allofmp3.com was a scam but I don't think you can call the people who fell for the scam "scammers".

I think that if people start to pay for pirate items, alongside with gambling and drugs, with Bitcoins, the Bitcoin price will just increase...

So what are people who bought songs from allofmp3.com called if not pirates?

Sorry I'm not following you. I made 2 points:
1. SOPA mostly deal with online piracy
2. pirates don't pay for the things they download

It looks like you're trying to refute point #2, but your refutation fails because you gave an example of a paid website, which pirates don't use (by definition).

Remember allofmp3.com?  A Russian online store selling all kinds of music from all artists and all labels in various unprotected formats.  The company never transferred any money to western copyright holders.

SOPA mostly deal with online piracy, and pirates don't pay for the things they download. They didn't pay with fiat back then, and they are not going to start paying in bitcoins now.