Topic: http://www.pyramining.com/ - Discussion thread (no advertising here) - page 127. (Read 318060 times)

Because I switched almost all back to P2Pool, since it seems that now Forrestv fixed the code. The difference is that on P2Pool block mined show ~24 hours after being found, instead of being readily available as in the previous pool. You should see your payout back to usual with a slight increase. I'll keep an eye open on that, anyway, just to be sure that everything is working as expected.

Why payouts is diminished so much? Just a few days before I got 0.08 BTC per block, now my reward is decreased to  0.004 Decreasing in 20 times for 5 days. 

2012-08-14 18:04:35 UTC   0.00426252    reward on deposit [428hsktx] (0.0114977:mining, 0.00345492:1st lev.ref., 0.01711639:2nd lev.ref., 0.01055565:3rd lev.ref., -0.00639367:1st lev.sp., -0.03196847:2nd lev.sp.)   
2012-08-14 15:04:38 UTC   0.02132028    deposit [428hsktx] reward (0.05750901:mining, 0.01728129:1st lev.ref., 0.08561392:2nd lev.ref., 0.05279794:3rd lev.ref., -0.03198029:1st lev.sp., -0.15990159:2nd lev.sp.)   
2012-08-13 20:25:22 UTC   0.0696426    rewarded (0.09097749:mining, 0.00373732:1st lev. referrals, 0.00253295:2nd lev. referrals, 0.00224154:3rd lev. referrals, -0.01492336:1st lev. sponsor, -0.00746167:2nd lev. sponsor, -0.00746167:3rd lev. sponsor)   
2012-08-13 19:05:05 UTC   0.06093801    rewarded (0.07960622:mining, 0.0032702:1st lev. referrals, 0.00221633:2nd lev. referrals, 0.00196138:3rd lev. referrals, -0.01305808:1st lev. sponsor, -0.00652902:2nd lev. sponsor, -0.00652902:3rd lev. sponsor)   
2012-08-13 17:45:23 UTC   0.06965094    rewarded (0.09098839:mining, 0.00373778:1st lev. referrals, 0.00253323:2nd lev. referrals, 0.00224181:3rd lev. referrals, -0.01492515:1st lev. sponsor, -0.00746256:2nd lev. sponsor, -0.00746256:3rd lev. sponsor)   
2012-08-13 17:05:05 UTC   0.0435234    rewarded (0.05687416:mining, 0.0023278:1st lev. referrals, 0.00157928:2nd lev. referrals, 0.00139492:3rd lev. referrals, -0.0093264:1st lev. sponsor, -0.00466318:2nd lev. sponsor, -0.00466318:3rd lev. sponsor)   
2012-08-13 07:05:27 UTC   0.0527287    rewarded (0.06890311:mining, 0.00282014:1st lev. referrals, 0.00191334:2nd lev. referrals, 0.00168995:3rd lev. referrals, -0.01129894:1st lev. sponsor, -0.00564945:2nd lev. sponsor, -0.00564945:3rd lev. sponsor)   
2012-08-12 22:25:27 UTC   0.07037531    rewarded (0.09196282:mining, 0.00376399:1st lev. referrals, 0.0025537:2nd lev. referrals, 0.00225554:3rd lev. referrals, -0.01508038:1st lev. sponsor, -0.00754018:2nd lev. sponsor, -0.00754018:3rd lev. sponsor)   
2012-08-12 21:05:11 UTC   0.03520296    rewarded (0.04600145:mining, 0.00188278:1st lev. referrals, 0.00127737:2nd lev. referrals, 0.00112822:3rd lev. referrals, -0.00754344:1st lev. sponsor, -0.00377171:2nd lev. sponsor, -0.00377171:3rd lev. sponsor)   
2012-08-11 19:45:42 UTC   0.12399236    rewarded (0.16202658:mining, 0.00663176:1st lev. referrals, 0.00449934:2nd lev. referrals, 0.00397404:3rd lev. referrals, -0.0265697:1st lev. sponsor, -0.01328483:2nd lev. sponsor, -0.01328483:3rd lev. sponsor)   
2012-08-11 12:24:59 UTC   0.01775646    rewarded (0.02320331:mining, 0.00094963:1st lev. referrals, 0.00064425:2nd lev. referrals, 0.00056903:3rd lev. referrals, -0.0038049:1st lev. sponsor, -0.00190243:2nd lev. sponsor, -0.00190243:3rd lev. sponsor)   
2012-08-10 14:05:14 UTC   0.07106507    rewarded (0.09286413:mining, 0.00380088:1st lev. referrals, 0.00257872:2nd lev. referrals, 0.00227765:3rd lev. referrals, -0.01522817:1st lev. sponsor, -0.00761407:2nd lev. sponsor, -0.00761407:3rd lev. sponsor)   
2012-08-10 03:05:07 UTC   0.0715689    rewarded (0.09352255:mining, 0.00382782:1st lev. referrals, 0.00259698:2nd lev. referrals, 0.00229379:3rd lev. referrals, -0.01533614:1st lev. sponsor, -0.00766805:2nd lev. sponsor, -0.00766805:3rd lev. sponsor)   
2012-08-09 20:45:17 UTC   0.08058245    rewarded (0.10530088:mining, 0.00430995:1st lev. referrals, 0.0029241:2nd lev. referrals, 0.00258272:3rd lev. referrals, -0.01726762:1st lev. sponsor, -0.00863379:2nd lev. sponsor, -0.00863379:3rd lev. sponsor)

Some new referrals:

http://pyramining.com/referral/fat34g6y2
http://pyramining.com/referral/hcbesa9p3
http://pyramining.com/referral/4pgkcrhs3
http://pyramining.com/referral/a3ckdm4se
http://pyramining.com/referral/c46s2qtxb

Thanks,
Davecoin

The transaction log is made by an amount column and a description column, which describes how the amount has been calculated, so it is a text field, actually. I will put it in the to-do list.

pyramining,

the description field is hard to follow, could it be possible to have a table insteasd?

Date	Amount	mining	1st level ref	2nd level ref	1st level sp	2nd level sp
today	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	-0.01	-0.01

what do you think?

spiccioli

Since the bug caused you to get more than expected (and not less), and since it's a small amount, I prefer to let things as they are and not ask you those 0.09xxx BTC back.

However it's not exploitable anymore since it has already been fixed.

Okay, yeah, confirmed that I got at least 0.497 BTC difference between my deposits and my payouts (attributed mostly to the bonuses, I would assume). It's quite confusing though, the wild swerves of the fees.

What about changing the pending balance to also reflect the negative value of the current account's balance? After the first 'bugged' payout that I posted previously, it would then reflect something like "-0.45794125", and now would be approx "-0.09709253," if we follow what you just stated.

Isn't this balancing a problem, though? One could exploit it by depositing, for example, 1.2 BTC, and they would get a full 2 BTC instead of the rightful 1.32. Your current system depends on my redepositing more funds, and though the assumption of it may not be unreasonable, it should not be allowed.

It's the same bug. If you make a balance between all the fees, you still got 0.09709253 more than you should. Do you confirm it?

Huh, another bug for you:


The second payout has a huge fee, and is most definitely incorrect as I should be getting approximately 3.3 btc back, whereas I only got 3 =|

Yes there has been a glitch, however the final amount seems be correct you got ~ 0.10 more than you should, but you can keep them. It's a display problem, happening only when an account gets it's last transaction (complete) and it has been introduced with the last patch (that allows to have payouts rounded to 1 BTC instead of 1 - 0.5%), and it should be already fixed now.

Also I checked all the transaction made in the meanwhile, and there is only one, in another account, which gives credit instead of taking it. Since the difference is very little, I will not modify it either. All other transactions are regular.

Thank you very much for reporting!

pyramining, I believe I have found a glitch 


Notice the negative fee 

It's not possible to change the rewards address because I can't be sure that you are owning the account you claim as yours.

Just received my 0.995 BTC. Thank you Pyramining!
I still have 9 BTC before I break even though :/

Is there any chance you would change the rewards address for me?

Ah ok, sorry, I'm accustomed to pools where blocks are more frequent and so payouts and seeing that last update was yesterday night I thought it could be a refresh issue.

spiccioli

If you make other deposits on the same account(/deposit address), a new entry is created. Subsequent deposits are not anymore merged all together. Every deposit has it's own life / activity. When a deposit gets fully rewarded, it becomes inactive.

This is useful to calculate the borrowed hash rate according to deposits:

Without this feature, if you deposited 1000 BTC, and your rewards was completed, if you added a 10 BTC deposit later, you would have 1010 BTC of infrastructure working until you get fully rewarded again. Now you would get 1000 BTC hashrate for the time that there is only the first deposit active, 1010 BTC hashrate when both deposits are active and 10 BTC hashrate when the first deposit is completed and the second is still active.

This is the last time something on the account record in the database changes. Now that deposits has been separated, it will change even less frequently. It's not related to other details (like the allocated hash rate, as an example, which is calculated each time it's needed). I don't think there is any reason to update it more frequently.

What are the details on the profile page that you want to see updated more often? I'll check which is the refresh time of those details.

Maybe I'll also change the description of the "last update" entry.

pyramining,

is it possible to refresh user stats more than once or twice a day?

Right now my data was last updated  2012-08-13 20:26:30 UTC


spiccioli

Everything crisp and clear! No errors encountered.


Btw. you can register and mine the links below:

http://pyramining.com/referral/qcexpf7t6
http://pyramining.com/referral/zhq4bd7g8
http://pyramining.com/referral/zaxte2cpd
http://pyramining.com/referral/9szcfbd3h
http://pyramining.com/referral/b9ez8qkrd
http://pyramining.com/referral/dtqyxs47r
http://pyramining.com/referral/xt97zbghf
http://pyramining.com/referral/8hem9qzdf
http://pyramining.com/referral/kbt7syhq3


or find them on https://www.facebook.com/pyramining

I see an active deposits tab, what other features does the update contain?

Thanks

Nice website. Thanks for the easy to use interface.