Stop trying to fix what isn't broken.
You mentioned my account(s9q3bxy8) as an example of a person that maybe will prefer bigger payouts. I like the threshold like it is. Don't use me as an example.
+1
Topic: http://www.pyramining.com/ - Discussion thread (no advertising here) - page 69. (Read 318060 times)
August 08, 2013, 05:35:33 AM
Stop trying to fix what isn't broken.
You mentioned my account(s9q3bxy8) as an example of a person that maybe will prefer bigger payouts. I like the threshold like it is. Don't use me as an example.
+1
August 08, 2013, 05:30:57 AM
Third this vote, tbh weekly payouts don't seem at that bad but no more than daily would be nice. Since more hash rate is being added I might recommend we start moving back to the 1 BTC payout threshold as well, maybe up to 0.5 for now until the entire hash rate has been released?
I was with ya up until the raising the threshold. I'm a small investor with Pyra...if it goes back up to even .5 I won't see another payout for 4 or 5 months...even with the raising hash rate. If a change is made to the threshold I would like to vote that the minimum stay at 0.1 but maybe add an option to allow individual accounts to raise the threshold if they so desire. Maybe even make the payouts more of an 'option' that can be set and let the users decide how nice they want to be on Pyra's bandwidth ...?
Maybe 2 different payoutintervalls. One daily with with 0.5 threshold and one weekly with 0.1 treshhold. Or a procentual treshhold (e.g. 1% of deposited ammount). Because i dont think, pyramining want to use an individual payoutoption.
Stop trying to fix what isn't broken.
You mentioned my account(s9q3bxy8) as an example of a person that maybe will prefer bigger payouts. I like the threshold like it is. Don't use me as an example.
August 08, 2013, 01:38:50 AM
Third this vote, tbh weekly payouts don't seem at that bad but no more than daily would be nice. Since more hash rate is being added I might recommend we start moving back to the 1 BTC payout threshold as well, maybe up to 0.5 for now until the entire hash rate has been released?
I was with ya up until the raising the threshold. I'm a small investor with Pyra...if it goes back up to even .5 I won't see another payout for 4 or 5 months...even with the raising hash rate. If a change is made to the threshold I would like to vote that the minimum stay at 0.1 but maybe add an option to allow individual accounts to raise the threshold if they so desire. Maybe even make the payouts more of an 'option' that can be set and let the users decide how nice they want to be on Pyra's bandwidth ...?
Maybe 2 different payoutintervalls. One daily with with 0.5 threshold and one weekly with 0.1 treshhold. Or a procentual treshhold (e.g. 1% of deposited ammount). Because i dont think, pyramining want to use an individual payoutoption.
August 07, 2013, 10:35:42 PM
Third this vote, tbh weekly payouts don't seem at that bad but no more than daily would be nice. Since more hash rate is being added I might recommend we start moving back to the 1 BTC payout threshold as well, maybe up to 0.5 for now until the entire hash rate has been released?
I was with ya up until the raising the threshold. I'm a small investor with Pyra...if it goes back up to even .5 I won't see another payout for 4 or 5 months...even with the raising hash rate. If a change is made to the threshold I would like to vote that the minimum stay at 0.1 but maybe add an option to allow individual accounts to raise the threshold if they so desire. Maybe even make the payouts more of an 'option' that can be set and let the users decide how nice they want to be on Pyra's bandwidth ...?
August 07, 2013, 01:15:36 PM
@pyramining: Could it be profitable, to limit payouts to happen once a day or even once a week (off course only if the threshold is reached) to save transactionfees? Because there are accounts with high deposits/rewards (for example s9q3bxy8 from hall of fame). And i could imagine it is really anoying, to get 10 payouts á 0.1 btc a day and therefore pay 10 times transactionfee.
I wouldn't mind putting a second on this vote. I have a bunch of little deposits cuz I'm just a tiny miner so I deposit when and what I can. I know you get my BTC to me so I'd be more than ok with just one lump sum deposit going into my account(s) per 24 hour period. I could see how people might get poopie about only once a week but once a day seems reasonable. Not that we are constantly getting multiple deposits per day, especially since switching to p2pool (hehe...had to dig a little sry) but just sayin...if the idea needs a "second"...this is it
EDIT: I actually read the original idea wrong so my reply doesn't make sense but now that I 'get' it I still second the notion
Third this vote, tbh weekly payouts don't seem at that bad but no more than daily would be nice. Since more hash rate is being added I might recommend we start moving back to the 1 BTC payout threshold as well, maybe up to 0.5 for now until the entire hash rate has been released?
August 07, 2013, 01:01:18 PM
I just joined a sponsor. I have a question, how many sponsor can I join? Its unlimited, no?
August 07, 2013, 12:57:01 PM
@pyramining: Could it be profitable, to limit payouts to happen once a day or even once a week (off course only if the threshold is reached) to save transactionfees? Because there are accounts with high deposits/rewards (for example s9q3bxy8 from hall of fame). And i could imagine it is really anoying, to get 10 payouts á 0.1 btc a day and therefore pay 10 times transactionfee.
I wouldn't mind putting a second on this vote. I have a bunch of little deposits cuz I'm just a tiny miner so I deposit when and what I can. I know you get my BTC to me so I'd be more than ok with just one lump sum deposit going into my account(s) per 24 hour period. I could see how people might get poopie about only once a week but once a day seems reasonable. Not that we are constantly getting multiple deposits per day, especially since switching to p2pool (hehe...had to dig a little sry) but just sayin...if the idea needs a "second"...this is it
EDIT: I actually read the original idea wrong so my reply doesn't make sense but now that I 'get' it I still second the notion
August 07, 2013, 12:35:57 PM
...what I don't understand is: 1.1 Thash = 40 months break even ?? Its like nothing happened...
also for example: 10 BTC Asic deposit equivalent hashing power <0.8 GH ....
0.8 gh for 10 BTC ... 44 Months reward time....
What is it I don't see?
also for example: 10 BTC Asic deposit equivalent hashing power <0.8 GH ....
0.8 gh for 10 BTC ... 44 Months reward time....
What is it I don't see?
Imho that stats are not able to tell the truth, until at least all preordered hardware is installed. And even at this time, its hard to predict an exact reward time.
@pyramining: Could it be profitable, to limit payouts to happen once a day or even once a week (off course only if the threshold is reached) to save transactionfees? Because there are accounts with high deposits/rewards (for example s9q3bxy8 from hall of fame). And i could imagine it is really anoying, to get 10 payouts á 0.1 btc a day and therefore pay 10 times transactionfee.
August 07, 2013, 12:11:55 PM
...what I don't understand is: 1.1 Thash = 40 months break even ?? Its like nothing happened...
also for example: 10 BTC Asic deposit equivalent hashing power <0.8 GH ....
0.8 gh for 10 BTC ... 44 Months reward time....
What is it I don't see?
also for example: 10 BTC Asic deposit equivalent hashing power <0.8 GH ....
0.8 gh for 10 BTC ... 44 Months reward time....
What is it I don't see?
August 07, 2013, 10:47:52 AM
thx 
August 07, 2013, 10:16:28 AM
at 4:30 there come 13 rewards
at 10:30 only 10 rewards
at 10:30 only 10 rewards
It should be fixed now. I created an account with a 10 BTC deposit under the first account you specified, to thank you for the bugreport.
August 07, 2013, 05:52:50 AM
Account label: 6e3mf4ck
at 4:30 there come 13 rewards
at 10:30 only 10 rewards
only deposits rewarded , which are paid in before 2013-05-03
Account label: 2h8rfnbg
at 22:30 no rewards
at 4:30 there come 9 rewards
at 10:30 only 3 rewards
only the 3 first made deposits rewardet
Account label: 6pqym9ca
also no rewards for the last 2 payins
in other accounts of me its the same
it look like your reward programm stops, before it is ready with all rewards
at 4:30 there come 13 rewards
at 10:30 only 10 rewards
only deposits rewarded , which are paid in before 2013-05-03
Account label: 2h8rfnbg
at 22:30 no rewards
at 4:30 there come 9 rewards
at 10:30 only 3 rewards
only the 3 first made deposits rewardet
Account label: 6pqym9ca
also no rewards for the last 2 payins
in other accounts of me its the same
it look like your reward programm stops, before it is ready with all rewards
August 07, 2013, 04:12:39 AM
Account label: 6e3mf4ck
something goes wrong with the rewards
i got rewards from 5 deposits, but i have 13 deposits in this account
something goes wrong with the rewards
i got rewards from 5 deposits, but i have 13 deposits in this account
I'm going to check what happened.
August 06, 2013, 05:59:18 PM
@pyraminig
Account label: 6e3mf4ck
something goes wrong with the rewards
i got rewards from 5 deposits, but i have 13 deposits in this account
in other accounts simmilar
in Account label: 2h8rfnbg
no rewards
Account label: 6e3mf4ck
something goes wrong with the rewards
i got rewards from 5 deposits, but i have 13 deposits in this account
in other accounts simmilar
in Account label: 2h8rfnbg
no rewards
August 06, 2013, 04:03:48 PM
Total hashing power: 1.1TH/s
August 05, 2013, 05:14:42 PM
that's what I thought, but i wanted to make sure before I deposited anymore
thanks!
thanks!
August 05, 2013, 05:08:57 PM
so I was curious, since the ASIC pre-order period is over, can we still deposit to accounts that took part in the ASIC deposits, or will all new deposits still be counted towards FPGA infrastructure?
All the deposits become ASIC deposits for default. It makes no more sense to add FPGA infrastructure at this point.
August 05, 2013, 05:03:56 PM
so I was curious, since the ASIC pre-order period is over, can we still deposit to accounts that took part in the ASIC deposits, or will all new deposits still be counted towards FPGA infrastructure?
August 05, 2013, 03:17:47 PM
How about some miner pr0n
The FPGA-Farm was awesome (cleanest setup I've seen so far).
The FPGA-Farm was awesome (cleanest setup I've seen so far).
Thanks!
Can't wait to see this one.
I will do it soon, like last time, view upon request. Instructions will come when it will be ready.
To everybody: please be a little more patient! Thanks! :-)
August 05, 2013, 03:03:26 PM
How about some miner pr0n
The FPGA-Farm was awesome (cleanest setup I've seen so far).
Can't wait to see this one.
The FPGA-Farm was awesome (cleanest setup I've seen so far).
Can't wait to see this one.
Jump to: