Pages:
Author

Topic: Huge ~40% Drop in Network Hashing Power (5/27/2011) - page 3. (Read 9235 times)

legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1005
deepbit.net is down! that is why.
hero member
Activity: 698
Merit: 500
probably some miner finally managed to melt his substation/transformer and he is alone in the dark Cheesy
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Indeed it is good for those of us in it for the long haul!  I was hoping this would happen
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1005
This is... GREAT news for those of us still mining!  Hopefully this is a sign of difficulty beginning to level off... I doubt it will stay that low, but I can hope, can't I?  Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Is this a joke?  This happens everytime the difficulty increases.... the accuracy of the hash rate calculation is not correct because of the 24hr sample rate.  I would assume someone with a few hundred posts on the forum would know better....

Please read the thread.

Edit: This is based on the graphs from http://bitcoin.sipa.be/ which do not have the same calculation flaw right after a difficulty change that BitcoinCharts does.

The sipa charts are not based on BitcoinChart's network hashrate calculations which are flawed around the time after a difficulty change.

http://bitcoin.sipa.be/

Edit: The sipa charts do not suffer from the same flawed calculation methodology that bitcoincharts does.

The sipa graph is the graph that I posted in the OP. It shows a 40% intraday swing. If you look at some of the other graphs on the sipa site, you will see that it those graphs do not have the same difficulty change miscalculation as bitcoincharts.
full member
Activity: 136
Merit: 100
The total network hashing power started 5/27/2011 UTC at ~5THash/s and swung to close the day at just over ~3THash/s. With a low around ~2.9THash/s.

That is a nearly 40% drop, day over day, in the first full day after the latest 78% difficulty increase.

Edit: This is based on the graphs from http://bitcoin.sipa.be/ which do not have the same calculation flaw right after a difficulty change that BitcoinCharts does.


Uploaded at ImageShack.

Is this a joke?  This happens everytime the difficulty increases.... the accuracy of the hash rate calculation is not correct because of the 24hr sample rate.  I would assume someone with a few hundred posts on the forum would know better....

Actually the green lone is an 8 hour moving average.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
The total network hashing power started 5/27/2011 UTC at ~5THash/s and swung to close the day at just over ~3THash/s. With a low around ~2.9THash/s.

That is a nearly 40% drop, day over day, in the first full day after the latest 78% difficulty increase.

Edit: This is based on the graphs from http://bitcoin.sipa.be/ which do not have the same calculation flaw right after a difficulty change that BitcoinCharts does.


Uploaded at ImageShack.

Is this a joke?  This happens everytime the difficulty increases.... the accuracy of the hash rate calculation is not correct because of the 24hr sample rate.  I would assume someone with a few hundred posts on the forum would know better....
legendary
Activity: 800
Merit: 1001
The total network hashing power started 5/27/2011 UTC at ~5THash/s and swung to close the day at just over ~3THash/s. With a low around ~2.9THash/s.

That is a nearly 40% drop, day over day, in the first full day after the latest 78% difficulty increase.


YAY!!!!!!!

-EP
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
So? dit that sipa charts show any drop in network hashrate ? Or they just to much flawed around difficulty raises ?

The sipa graph is the graph that I posted in the OP. It shows a 40% intraday swing. If you look at some of the other graphs on the sipa site, you will see that it those graphs do not have the same difficulty change miscalculation as bitcoincharts.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
So? dit that sipa charts show any drop in network hashrate ? Or they just to much flawed around difficulty raises ?
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Bitcoinchart crude assumption on difficulty, total hashrate, [...]

No, but also remember that hashing power is calculated based on the current difficulty and the last few blocks. So when there is a dramatic increase in difficulty, this throws off the calculation, which can explain why the hash power shot up above 5Thash and then back down to 3.4Thash. btcguild was doing almost 300Ghash, which would put the network at 3.1Thash, which appears to be where it dropped to.

The sipa charts are not based on BitcoinChart's network hashrate calculations which are flawed around the time after a difficulty change.

http://bitcoin.sipa.be/

Edit: The sipa charts do not suffer from the same flawed calculation methodology that bitcoincharts does.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
btcguild was down, it seems to be back up now.

BTCGuild alone doesn't account for a ~2THash swing, though.

No, but also remember that hashing power is calculated based on the current difficulty and the last few blocks. So when there is a dramatic increase in difficulty, this throws off the calculation, which can explain why the hash power shot up above 5Thash and then back down to 3.4Thash. btcguild was doing almost 300Ghash, which would put the network at 3.1Thash, which appears to be where it dropped to.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Bitcoinchart crude assumption on total hashrate,  and mainly - psychological  factor of that assumptions on fresh miners did that.
Many is quit from mining.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
btcguild was down, it seems to be back up now.

BTCGuild alone doesn't account for a ~2THash swing, though.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
btcguild was down, it seems to be back up now.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
The total network hashing power started 5/27/2011 UTC at ~5THash/s and swung to close the day at just over ~3THash/s. With a low around ~2.9THash/s.

That is a nearly 40% drop, day over day, in the first full day after the latest 78% difficulty increase.

Edit: This is based on the graphs from http://bitcoin.sipa.be/ which do not have the same calculation flaw right after a difficulty change that BitcoinCharts does.


Uploaded at ImageShack.
Pages:
Jump to: