Topic: hugeblack made false accusations against me. (Read 899 times)

You mean it's me?

Yes, you have the right to investigate my account, but I will ask for your promise, if there is no evidence then you must remove the neutral tag you provided.

---

As for deadsea33, I believe this account has changed hands. If it was the original owner, he would hide because of his suspicious past and dare not complain about the neutral tag because even if he had a neutral tag, he could still join the signature campaign.

Well, the deadsea33 account has not received a negative tag but you are right he thought he was clever to create a topic about the neutral tag that hugeblack left for him. Maybe he was confident some members would come to his defence because of the threads he created to giveaway merits and build his account but that did not happen.

In the end, it was just a neutral tag therefore he had no need to create this thread. I am sure he has other accounts he is using for signature campaigns therefore he will try to be more careful when using them.

He cannot answer these questions because he bought or hacked the account and is claiming it as his own because no wallet has ever been used on this account.  So he might be thinking that since no wallet has been used in this account before, no one can't be asked to sign messages from any specific old wallet. So he thinks himself very clever and created a topic here against hugeblack's decision.  But he never imagined that a bigger truth could come out and red tag his account he he

Ok ok I believe you are innocent. everyone is misunderstanding you  Can you answer some simple logical questions?

1. The account was registered in 2013 which is 10 years ago today.  You can access 10 year old email to reset account password.  But meanwhile the account was last used before it became inactive in 2021. As per your statement you forgot the account password set 2 years ago! How believable can it be?

2. If we believe the answer to question number 1 then what is the logic of changing your account email? Where you had email access. Or are you afraid that the real owner can reset the account by recovering the email 

3. This account has never been applied to a signature campaign, it has been used for project work.  But the account woke up after a long time and started applying for the signature campaign. What is the logic of it?

4. Why did you edit the previous posts and delete the texts? What is the reason for deleting if you have done it yourself?

I think the feedback is valid and nothing to be mad about or create a thread for, just be yourself. do what you should do. Be happy instead you still had access to your 10 year old Full Member account so you didn't need to start all over again. if you have honest intentions with time this feedback will disappear.  


Cheers!

real simple did you stake an address before say 2020.  if you did show the post in the address staking thread.

If not no one will be sure you lie or speak truth.

No answer will be accepted unless you refer to old good thread info.

heres why: anyone can find old unused forum account and try to hack it.

You get lucky and hack it.

You change password.

You hope no one sees you did it.

Lucky for the forum hugeblack spotted the inconsistencies with your account.

Good luck proving you own it and are the original owner.

I search you on forum and I do not have any deals I did that can help prove its you. So an old stake address is your best shot.

To be unbiased, I have known the hugeblack member for a long time, and I trust his justice. The history of previous feedback that he sent to any member before this case resulted in conclusive evidence, whether positive, negative, or neutral. As for the OP's case, Hugeblack did the right thing because what veteran members here, like @lovesmayfamilis, @YOSHIE, @holydarkness, and @JollyGood, pointed out is enough evidence to prove that Hugeblack didn't make false accusations or falsely neutral trust.

Suppose the OP can provide evidence that he is the original owner of the account by signing a message to one of the Bitcoin addresses referred to by @JeromeTash dating back to 2017. In that case, Hugeblack can reconsider his matter. Still, about that, he came back after a long time and changed the password and email and deleted the posts, and edited the titles of most of the topics to (.) upon his return; this really raises doubts.

I would ask how someone such as a newbie account created a few months ago is going that deep in to the historical issues of the forum and is more aware about the political ongoings of the forum rather than of Bitcoin itself (as his posts indicate).

Though it is not necessarily an indication of guilt, you would expect the one operating the account to be more active in defending his position if the accusation is false. I am looking forward to reading what they have to say if they return the forum.

I would stand with Hugeblack because he has been very active on the forum and he never add tags to a member without proper information. The whole information the members have shared in the post mostly prove that the owner is a changed person, and whatever the OP has said in the thread seems fishy to me. The good thing for OP is that the Hugeblack has left a neutral tag only, and if he can prove that he's the original owner of the account then I'm more than sure that Hugeblack will remove the tag without any question.

But, I'm quite sure that the OP won't be able to prove that his account is for real and he may not be able to come up with a proper explanation that would convince Hugeblack to remove the tag. I'm going to be following the thread and I'll on the notifications for this post because it would be very interesting to see that what kind of proofs the OP will share with us. To OP, if you are the original owner of the account then it doesn't make sense to change the e-mail and password so instantly.

This case interested me because while there's a good chance this account changed hands there's a slight chance it still belongs to the original owner.

Vlad (Vlad2Vlad) is a mercurial fellow who has been around for longer than myself. I think he may have been temp banned but it looks like he logged in just a couple of days ago, so I pinged him. Maybe he'll see my post. Maybe he's still temp banned, hard to say.

Strange! How was it even possible? The following reply was deleted and it was for you. I swear I did not delete it, I did not receive a PM of moderators deleting it too? It must be deleted using direct database query and in that case I can not be the only one. I will do some investigations and in the mean time if anyone else faced this, then please update.

Anyway, I got this from my draft.


Thanks for explaining your thoughts

1. I would silently wait and observe the user and after a few weeks if that would look suspicious then I would ask him in private to show some proves that the account was not changed. If he failed then I would [may be] leave a neutral if I saw a danger.

2. But he hasn't asked yet. It was again in my process of observing him. If he really made such move and ask for loan then without any further delay I would contact him asking for a proof of him not being a sold or changed account. Fail would immediately warrant a red tag from me not a note type neutral.

Without judging and using the feedback page as your note, why not truly use a note for yourself which will be private but not public not even visible for the person you are suspecting. Point is, if you are wrong then you are devaluing and disrespecting the person in front of a busy crowed.

I am sure hugeblack has his heart in the right place but this neutral is not saving OP from investigation. In fact this neutral will bring some other DT power seeker members [I don't want to tell their name] to leave more neutral/red feedback without listing anything from the OP. They never do listen. Resulting the account will be destroyed even if that was the real owner of the account.