Topic: Human minable coin - page 7. (Read 16942 times)
Great thanks.
Whats the mining like? curious at 1hr int.
-watching
-watching
exchange for this? where we can trade it, without exchange this coin will be forgotten quickly, dev contact yobit please
addnode=62.75.216.153
addnode=66.118.187.120
addnode=103.240.65.240
addnode=54.186.9.248
addnode=199.19.215.50
addnode=192.254.71.126
addnode=66.118.187.120
addnode=103.240.65.240
addnode=54.186.9.248
addnode=199.19.215.50
addnode=192.254.71.126
I have 3 connections with this:
01:29:41

[
{
"id" : 4,
"addr" : "192.254.71.126:8764",
"addrlocal" : "93.37.95.184:55088",
"services" : "0000000000000001",
"lastsend" : 1462663669,
"lastrecv" : 1462663737,
"bytessent" : 821272,
"bytesrecv" : 6450605,
"conntime" : 1462621885,
"pingtime" : 0.29601700,
"version" : 70002,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.10.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1461,
"banscore" : 0,
"synced_headers" : 2061,
"synced_blocks" : 2061,
"inflight" : [
],
"whitelisted" : false
},
{
"id" : 5,
"addr" : "62.75.216.153:8764",
"addrlocal" : "93.37.95.184:55091",
"services" : "0000000000000001",
"lastsend" : 1462663669,
"lastrecv" : 1462663737,
"bytessent" : 634478,
"bytesrecv" : 2288797,
"conntime" : 1462621887,
"pingtime" : 0.19501100,
"version" : 70002,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.10.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1461,
"banscore" : 0,
"synced_headers" : 2061,
"synced_blocks" : 2061,
"inflight" : [
],
"whitelisted" : false
},
{
"id" : 6,
"addr" : "66.118.187.120:8764",
"addrlocal" : "93.37.95.184:55098",
"services" : "0000000000000001",
"lastsend" : 1462663737,
"lastrecv" : 1462663738,
"bytessent" : 584189,
"bytesrecv" : 1441296,
"conntime" : 1462621888,
"pingtime" : 0.29301700,
"version" : 70002,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.10.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1461,
"banscore" : 0,
"synced_headers" : 2061,
"synced_blocks" : 2061,
"inflight" : [
],
"whitelisted" : false
}
]
01:29:41

[
{
"id" : 4,
"addr" : "192.254.71.126:8764",
"addrlocal" : "93.37.95.184:55088",
"services" : "0000000000000001",
"lastsend" : 1462663669,
"lastrecv" : 1462663737,
"bytessent" : 821272,
"bytesrecv" : 6450605,
"conntime" : 1462621885,
"pingtime" : 0.29601700,
"version" : 70002,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.10.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1461,
"banscore" : 0,
"synced_headers" : 2061,
"synced_blocks" : 2061,
"inflight" : [
],
"whitelisted" : false
},
{
"id" : 5,
"addr" : "62.75.216.153:8764",
"addrlocal" : "93.37.95.184:55091",
"services" : "0000000000000001",
"lastsend" : 1462663669,
"lastrecv" : 1462663737,
"bytessent" : 634478,
"bytesrecv" : 2288797,
"conntime" : 1462621887,
"pingtime" : 0.19501100,
"version" : 70002,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.10.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1461,
"banscore" : 0,
"synced_headers" : 2061,
"synced_blocks" : 2061,
"inflight" : [
],
"whitelisted" : false
},
{
"id" : 6,
"addr" : "66.118.187.120:8764",
"addrlocal" : "93.37.95.184:55098",
"services" : "0000000000000001",
"lastsend" : 1462663737,
"lastrecv" : 1462663738,
"bytessent" : 584189,
"bytesrecv" : 1441296,
"conntime" : 1462621888,
"pingtime" : 0.29301700,
"version" : 70002,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.10.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1461,
"banscore" : 0,
"synced_headers" : 2061,
"synced_blocks" : 2061,
"inflight" : [
],
"whitelisted" : false
}
]
hi help me has you some node because i has wallet not sync and last block is 481 4 days ago.Thanks
How many coins in circulation?
Mined already (~block 840), around 160k. Total will be 10.5 million.The new version seems to be a big improvement. Initially it looked like it was still broken, but things seem to be going along well.
How many coins in circulation?
Mined already (~block 840), around 160k. Total will be 10.5 million.
How many coins in circulation?
Last two blocks of RC1 main chain were mined with the heuristic miner embedded with facile miner (libsolver) on something like 507 difficulty (last before 6x6 boards).
The client miner accepts several parameters:
It maybe required to play a bit with -t and -m, as for example, 2 - 3 seconds for t and 400 for m is almost enough for 4x4.
For 5x5 optimal m should be something between 3000 and 10000. Or m can be very large (20 - 30k) and t can be set to 100 - 200 sec. However, any t larger than 2 -3 sec will freeze the client while auto runs.
The client miner accepts several parameters:
Code:
-r, --requestnew request new game if auto fails
-t RUNTIME, --runtime=RUNTIME
auto solver run time
-m MAXATTEMPTS, --maxattempts=MAXATTEMPTS
auto solver max attempts
It maybe required to play a bit with -t and -m, as for example, 2 - 3 seconds for t and 400 for m is almost enough for 4x4.
For 5x5 optimal m should be something between 3000 and 10000. Or m can be very large (20 - 30k) and t can be set to 100 - 200 sec. However, any t larger than 2 -3 sec will freeze the client while auto runs.
thanks now is working better
Last two blocks of RC1 main chain were mined with the heuristic miner embedded with facile miner (libsolver) on something like 507 difficulty (last before 6x6 boards).
The client miner accepts several parameters:
It maybe required to play a bit with -t and -m, as for example, 2 - 3 seconds for t and 400 for m is almost enough for 4x4.
For 5x5 optimal m should be something between 3000 and 10000. Or m can be very large (20 - 30k) and t can be set to 100 - 200 sec. However, any t larger than 2 -3 sec will freeze the client while auto runs.
The client miner accepts several parameters:
Code:
-r, --requestnew request new game if auto fails
-t RUNTIME, --runtime=RUNTIME
auto solver run time
-m MAXATTEMPTS, --maxattempts=MAXATTEMPTS
auto solver max attempts
It maybe required to play a bit with -t and -m, as for example, 2 - 3 seconds for t and 400 for m is almost enough for 4x4.
For 5x5 optimal m should be something between 3000 and 10000. Or m can be very large (20 - 30k) and t can be set to 100 - 200 sec. However, any t larger than 2 -3 sec will freeze the client while auto runs.
Why don't you just release the source and let people compile themselves?
I am also interested in getting the source public, and probably will have it cleaned over the weekend.
I published those two pieces of code, so anyone can pick up a disassembler and compare the two binaries, one with false positive, and the one without. The only difference is the data types which were holding block height in GetBlockValue().
Success:
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/11114b4cda2c164233885e555eb8b744c8b86e695802c8228b61845de6e8ffaf/analysis/1462558147/
What was happening: whenever adding this two lines:
and recompiling Baidu antivirus would report false positive.
I assume there was a similar branch in that trojan (if something >= than 485, then do something).
Tried about 10 times to rewrite it differently, but mingw optimizer would end with same code.
I ended rewriting it this way:
If that would not work, I was planning to use some output from a sha256 for the branch..
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/11114b4cda2c164233885e555eb8b744c8b86e695802c8228b61845de6e8ffaf/analysis/1462558147/
What was happening: whenever adding this two lines:
Code:
if( nHeight >= Params().RC2SoftForkHeight())
nSubsidy = 50 * COIN;
I assume there was a similar branch in that trojan (if something >= than 485, then do something).
Tried about 10 times to rewrite it differently, but mingw optimizer would end with same code.
I ended rewriting it this way:
Code:
uint256 u256nHeight = uint256(nHeight);
//if( nHeight >= Params().RC2SoftForkHeight())
if(u256nHeight >= uint256(485))
nSubsidy = 50 * COIN;
If that would not work, I was planning to use some output from a sha256 for the branch..
Why don't you just release the source and let people compile themselves?
how people compile is there any tutorial to do that?
The linux build doesn't have any option to 'humanly mine'
Success:
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/11114b4cda2c164233885e555eb8b744c8b86e695802c8228b61845de6e8ffaf/analysis/1462558147/
What was happening: whenever adding this two lines:
and recompiling Baidu antivirus would report false positive.
I assume there was a similar branch in that trojan (if something >= than 485, then do something).
Tried about 10 times to rewrite it differently, but mingw optimizer would end with same code.
I ended rewriting it this way:
If that would not work, I was planning to use some output from a sha256 for the branch..
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/11114b4cda2c164233885e555eb8b744c8b86e695802c8228b61845de6e8ffaf/analysis/1462558147/
What was happening: whenever adding this two lines:
Code:
if( nHeight >= Params().RC2SoftForkHeight())
nSubsidy = 50 * COIN;
I assume there was a similar branch in that trojan (if something >= than 485, then do something).
Tried about 10 times to rewrite it differently, but mingw optimizer would end with same code.
I ended rewriting it this way:
Code:
uint256 u256nHeight = uint256(nHeight);
//if( nHeight >= Params().RC2SoftForkHeight())
if(u256nHeight >= uint256(485))
nSubsidy = 50 * COIN;
If that would not work, I was planning to use some output from a sha256 for the branch..
Why don't you just release the source and let people compile themselves?
So far I manage to solve 10 blocks 
Guys how are you doing?
Guys how are you doing?
This game is just as crappy and unsolvable as the previous one. It just gives IP bans with the new wallet. Pity I missed the instamine portion with 4x4 blocks earlier. It will just get stuck again.
true man
just solved 10 block and that's it...
not a single block
So far I manage to solve 10 blocks
Guys how are you doing?
Guys how are you doing?
Success:
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/11114b4cda2c164233885e555eb8b744c8b86e695802c8228b61845de6e8ffaf/analysis/1462558147/
What was happening: whenever adding this two lines:
and recompiling Baidu antivirus would report false positive.
I assume there was a similar branch in that trojan (if something >= than 485, then do something).
Tried about 10 times to rewrite it differently, but mingw optimizer would end with same code.
I ended rewriting it this way:
If that would not work, I was planning to use some output from a sha256 for the branch..
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/11114b4cda2c164233885e555eb8b744c8b86e695802c8228b61845de6e8ffaf/analysis/1462558147/
What was happening: whenever adding this two lines:
Code:
if( nHeight >= Params().RC2SoftForkHeight())
nSubsidy = 50 * COIN;
I assume there was a similar branch in that trojan (if something >= than 485, then do something).
Tried about 10 times to rewrite it differently, but mingw optimizer would end with same code.
I ended rewriting it this way:
Code:
uint256 u256nHeight = uint256(nHeight);
//if( nHeight >= Params().RC2SoftForkHeight())
if(u256nHeight >= uint256(485))
nSubsidy = 50 * COIN;
If that would not work, I was planning to use some output from a sha256 for the branch..
block reward is 300 FCN
and on my laptop is 50 FCN
and on my laptop is 50 FCN
The 300 FCN block reward is the forked chain. Please download again binaries, clear the data folder and restart mining. Don't use the wallet, use instead the facilecoind -daemon if you think there is an issue with the false positive.
I will make a new wallet available asap.
ok I will do that
Jump to: