Topic: I am 90% sure that "EhVedadooAnonimato" is Satoshi (Read 3284 times)

they said i could be anything so i become EhVedadooAnonimato

Then little thing like that may change the bitcoin price

Or was thrown in a dungeon by the banksters.


 or maybe he forgot his login!

Isn't it possible that satoshi stopped posting suddenly because he died ?

I am waiting for Satoshi's p2pfoundation account to become active now and post:

"I am not EhVedadooAnonimato"

So lets get to the point then, who is he?

If this wasn't enough prepare... Sit down and have a deep breath...

Ready?!

When bitcoin lauched I was in Italy, on hollidays.
I had spare time and wrote an article about currencies with a very trippy and visionary banknote image.
See the blog post here:
http://velocidadedaresposta.blogs.sapo.pt/7375.html

Look at the date of that blog post, my username handle, and tell me how odd?
I'm not Satoshi but have been using bicomplex and bichoverde for ages.

And Ihave a very odd patent about digital money tokens that was registered before bitcoin.

So I guess I make a really good case for being close the source...

So, now, can I get your attention when I say I know who is Satoshi?

I think that has been said before but was extremely debated.
Search the forums, there's quite a few threads about it.

what about satoshi is actually Gavin, and he create the satoshi account first, then his real account just to sidetrack we all

their writing style isn't that different, but i guess every writting style about technical aspects would look the same

Sunglasses are an important accessory for reducing sun damage.

Wait.....
So now he is your uncle?
And you are posting his and your email to prove what?

And you knew about p2p money back in 2009?

Man, what are you trying to do?
Are you trying to make yourself (and your uncle) look important?

I don't get what you 're trying to do, but your trolling is unbelievable (literally - I don't believe it)

But there is more. This gets really interesting. I used to send him emails to [email protected]. I know as a matter of fact that he received my emails although he never replyed to them. He once told my mum that he used to receive my emails. Some interesting ones and some quite crazy. But the really interesting stuff is that one of my last emails to him was a link to a blog post that was talking about some p2p money that was out there. This was in 2009!!!
Unfortunately I dont have the link of that blog post but would be really interesting for me to prove that I got to know about p2p money back in 2009 when I was studying Computer Science and finding it sufficently interesting to send an email to my dear uncle forwarding him the link of that blog post where p2p money was being discussed.
After that, surprisingly enough, the emails I sent him would always bounce back so I gave up sending him emails or trying to contact him ever since.
But I only entered bitcoin world in August 2011 when Ray Kurzweil posted about it on the AI-news mailing-list.

See the email address mentioned at:
http://cienciapt.net/pt/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=81114&Itemid=298
Goos luck in trying contacting him and keeping us posted.

Believe it or not. It is true.

It seems that he's obsessed with that user. Either way, what would happen if he's satoshi really?

I've only begun to look at this, but am I the only one who noticed that though this user stopped posting just before 666 posts, his "Activity" score is 616 which is supposedly the "true number" of the wild beast?  
  
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/616_%28number%29  
  
For someone who enjoys hiding references and symbols, this is quite amusing and clever.  It also suggests that this account was used as long as intended, and then discarded at a self-decided time.
  
Also, I advise against you all militantly trying to hunt down the user/users/group who used the Satoshi acronym.  Whoever he/she/they were, they were obviously some of the most intelligent humans alive, and went to extraordinary and extremely well thought out measures to protect their identity.  There is a lot of interesting connections that can be made if you do the proper research, but this information is best kept to yourself.  
  
This is a secret that is meant to stay secret, and the results of such 'investigation' will surely never be good.  What if you definitely find a list of names who were 'Satoshi'?  What then?  At best, you have damaged bitcoin and cryptocurrency by linking it to an individual, when cryptocurrency is an ideal that is supposed to transcend any one of us individually.  
  
At worst?  You have failed, and pissed off some very well connected and powerful people.  
 
Also, many of you are making a fool of yourself.  What is that?  A chart showing the posting frequency and times when 'Satoshi' most often posted? 
 
You think one of the smartest, paranoid, and ingenious game theorists and mathematicians of our time didn't anticipate this data being used against him one day?  I would question almost any 'clues' you find, as the likelyhood of them being false flags is so great that it is difficult to draw any decent conclusions from such finds.

Not even close to satoshi's style.

Eh, polls in bitcointalk recently hasn't been that much reliable because sockpuppet accounts mainly contribute to these things. EhVedadoOAnonimato pulled up a nice feat on being that "Satoshi" dude which made OP think that it's him. Whatever the case, we aren't close in getting the real identity behind Satoshi because Satoshi doesn't want to expose himself in the first place. If so, he could've done that in the past.

I think satoshi's post patterns were consistent with someone who was devoting a certain part of his day towards a particular activity. It could have been that he was working at a certain time (at his place of employment), it could have been that he devoted certain hours to building the Bitcoin code, it could have been that he was maintaining a very strict sleep schedule, it could have been that his family's schedule mandated that he needed to spend time with them at a certain part of the day. Whatever this commitment was could have changed/gone away over the past 4 years so I don't think a posting time analysis is going to give very much information.

---

I really do not think the facts in the OP would lead a reasonable person to believe that EhVedadooAnonimato is satoshi

Wow.  The two most popular poll results are the least and the greatest percentages.  I was tending towards it is not him but I no not know much about the user in question.

I am sure that Ehbeda is not satoshi. Too many people posting BS and saying oh its him no its this person no darn it maybe this person. Only way for anyone to find out who really sotish is, is by sotish coming back on bitcointalk and posting or a public announcement in some private location of him proving he is the real satoshi.

And a stable sleep/work mean that he is not a developer