Pages:
Author

Topic: I am here to guide all of you. - page 3. (Read 3095 times)

legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1000
January 16, 2016, 02:45:27 PM
#36
-snip-
Ok, but need to be a [button] that says [Start Mining] right on the main screen of the GUI. Not a hidden command, only designed for computer scientist. not computer consumers. the people who move the mouse around and click on stuff.

So, no revolution without a guide, eh?

I dont see a problem with creating a simple text file in the correct folder to get what you want. If that little is too much to ask, we might as well go full hearn.

thats process is not relevant to what bitcoin is. creating files, adding command and IPS is not what using bitcoin on a daily should be. A user should be able to click to send, click to generate, click to close, click to anything.

Why?

because bitcoin is stagnating right now. Mining is centralized and the idea of the bitcoin philosophy seems more complicated when you have to explain the mining as a separate process of the bitcoin core. So its like yes to use bitcoin just download the core and start receiving, Oh you want time bitcoins? thats a diff story grandma, you need a 60THS miner that cost 20K USD in preorder. It makes users run away from the whole idea.

I guess you left bitcointalk cause all the users around was so stupid that they even did not value your brilliant ideas.
But thanks god you come back with THE SOLUTION: BUTTON.

Thank you so much.

newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
January 16, 2016, 02:41:24 PM
#35
Everyone knows me, Maria OG.

I am the oldest miner of this forum and I must say, we are getting distracted. Who cares if X or Y developer quits. Lets focus on educating about the benefits of virtual currency agains fiat "paper or digital form" currency.

The first mistake that was made was removing the easy mining feature. by doing this, you centralized mining on not only those with the knowledge to mine, but also the equipment needed. If it was left integrated with bitcoin core, than the distribution of the coin would have been by now broader. broader distribution of bitcoin means what we all know it meas.

Lets discuss about this AMA!

Maria

you are a noob, not because of your activity level but just your lack of understanding of bitcoin mining.
lets say mining was left integrated into bitcoin-core.exe rather than allowing separate 'lite' implementation..
it doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure ways around it, not only by faking the .exe relay data to then use on more simplistic systems to then allow multiple systems per user, cheaper than just 1 system.
but also it doesnt take much effort to just buy multiple computers either.
if you next say about limiting IP addresses as another solution.. i would say.. prove that there are 1 million individual miners with individual IP's vs 5 miners with 200,000 ip's each.

no matter what way you implement something and put security to try to create a fair and just system. people will find a way to use it to their advantage.


I think you miss read so ill rephrase. If mining was left in the .exe as you say, then today I noob would download the core and start mining. plain and simple and integrated in the whole bitcoin idea. easier to digest and understand as a noob, also makes me feel like im part of the whole generating process. I am proposing no sort of limitation, im suggesting to reimplement coin generating into the core so cpu hashes can join the party and help decentralize the coin generation process. Which is currently mainly in china, not globally distributed in multiple devices the way it should. So the Chinese mining farms will constantly have to compete with the million of laptops also generating coins.

Would it not be a complete waste of time and electricity, not to mention degrading hardware, for a person to be mining on there laptop or home PC?  surely they would never find a block againt the mining farms anyway?

One of the laptops in the world will find a block. Its a lottery, the laptop guy just bought less tickets than the mining farms
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
January 16, 2016, 02:39:48 PM
#34
-snip-
Ok, but need to be a [button] that says [Start Mining] right on the main screen of the GUI. Not a hidden command, only designed for computer scientist. not computer consumers. the people who move the mouse around and click on stuff.

So, no revolution without a guide, eh?

I dont see a problem with creating a simple text file in the correct folder to get what you want. If that little is too much to ask, we might as well go full hearn.

thats process is not relevant to what bitcoin is. creating files, adding command and IPS is not what using bitcoin on a daily should be. A user should be able to click to send, click to generate, click to close, click to anything.

Why?

because bitcoin is stagnating right now. Mining is centralized and the idea of the bitcoin philosophy seems more complicated when you have to explain the mining as a separate process of the bitcoin core. So its like yes to use bitcoin just download the core and start receiving, Oh you want time bitcoins? thats a diff story grandma, you need a 60THS miner that cost 20K USD in preorder. It makes users run away from the whole idea.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
January 16, 2016, 02:39:28 PM
#33
creating files, adding command and IPS is not what using bitcoin on a daily should be. A user should be able to click to send, click to generate, click to close, click to anything.

+21mm!!

IIRC the primecoin wallet I used long ago had this button, and I mined UNB a bit with setgenerate true -1 or something like that a long time ago too.

I have the electrum BTC wallet and am suprised how bland it is in comparison to most altcoin wallets I have used.. It definately could use some art and styling.

Bitcoin needs to be EASY and NEWBIE FRIENDLY to use, add some attractive design.
hero member
Activity: 1106
Merit: 521
January 16, 2016, 02:38:28 PM
#32
Everyone knows me, Maria OG.

I am the oldest miner of this forum and I must say, we are getting distracted. Who cares if X or Y developer quits. Lets focus on educating about the benefits of virtual currency agains fiat "paper or digital form" currency.

The first mistake that was made was removing the easy mining feature. by doing this, you centralized mining on not only those with the knowledge to mine, but also the equipment needed. If it was left integrated with bitcoin core, than the distribution of the coin would have been by now broader. broader distribution of bitcoin means what we all know it meas.

Lets discuss about this AMA!

Maria

you are a noob, not because of your activity level but just your lack of understanding of bitcoin mining.
lets say mining was left integrated into bitcoin-core.exe rather than allowing separate 'lite' implementation..
it doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure ways around it, not only by faking the .exe relay data to then use on more simplistic systems to then allow multiple systems per user, cheaper than just 1 system.
but also it doesnt take much effort to just buy multiple computers either.
if you next say about limiting IP addresses as another solution.. i would say.. prove that there are 1 million individual miners with individual IP's vs 5 miners with 200,000 ip's each.

no matter what way you implement something and put security to try to create a fair and just system. people will find a way to use it to their advantage.


I think you miss read so ill rephrase. If mining was left in the .exe as you say, then today I noob would download the core and start mining. plain and simple and integrated in the whole bitcoin idea. easier to digest and understand as a noob, also makes me feel like im part of the whole generating process. I am proposing no sort of limitation, im suggesting to reimplement coin generating into the core so cpu hashes can join the party and help decentralize the coin generation process. Which is currently mainly in china, not globally distributed in multiple devices the way it should. So the Chinese mining farms will constantly have to compete with the million of laptops also generating coins.

Would it not be a complete waste of time and electricity, not to mention degrading hardware, for a person to be mining on there laptop or home PC?  surely they would never find a block againt the mining farms anyway?
sr. member
Activity: 826
Merit: 250
January 16, 2016, 02:35:06 PM
#31
If mining was so easy like some POS altcoins then Bitcoin probably was not reaching to these prices.Bitcoin will come out successfully from current wave of fud by bankers paid workers.Bitcoin will bounce back sooner this time more higher than it was recently.
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
January 16, 2016, 02:34:51 PM
#30
-snip-
Ok, but need to be a [button] that says [Start Mining] right on the main screen of the GUI. Not a hidden command, only designed for computer scientist. not computer consumers. the people who move the mouse around and click on stuff.

So, no revolution without a guide, eh?

I dont see a problem with creating a simple text file in the correct folder to get what you want. If that little is too much to ask, we might as well go full hearn.

thats process is not relevant to what bitcoin is. creating files, adding command and IPS is not what using bitcoin on a daily should be. A user should be able to click to send, click to generate, click to close, click to anything.

Why?
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
January 16, 2016, 02:32:42 PM
#29
-snip-
Ok, but need to be a [button] that says [Start Mining] right on the main screen of the GUI. Not a hidden command, only designed for computer scientist. not computer consumers. the people who move the mouse around and click on stuff.

So, no revolution without a guide, eh?

I dont see a problem with creating a simple text file in the correct folder to get what you want. If that little is too much to ask, we might as well go full hearn.

thats process is not relevant to what bitcoin is. creating files, adding command and IPS is not what using bitcoin on a daily should be. A user should be able to click to send, click to generate, click to close, click to anything.

legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1005
January 16, 2016, 02:32:35 PM
#28
I also don't know about you but what does matter is I do agree on this phrase that x or y can leave Bitcoin as it doesn't depends on persons.I do believe in Bitcoin and it has reached the point where it can not undo and reversed.This wheel of time which has one way movement that is ahead towards more better and stable future.Bitcoin is first step towards digital currencies and it will live here.
legendary
Activity: 4270
Merit: 4534
January 16, 2016, 02:32:09 PM
#27
in 10 seconds i can make code to make a program on 10,000 computers appear to have 'pressed a button'

so even though it would appear easier for people to get into mining without knowing code.. as its a nice easy 1 button and go..
their earnings would be 6 sats an hour because smarter people would have made a work around to be more productive.

i think the wa to get new people into bitcoin is to start them off as just users. and then gently teach them about hobby mining using altcoins, which can be more profitable while still benefiting from the learning experience.. and then if the are serious enough to join the ranks of the petahash level of mining with the funding to afford the systems required, then they can.

but reinventing the wheel wont bring back the glory days of horse drawn carts transporting gold.
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
January 16, 2016, 02:29:53 PM
#26
-snip-
Ok, but need to be a [button] that says [Start Mining] right on the main screen of the GUI. Not a hidden command, only designed for computer scientist. not computer consumers. the people who move the mouse around and click on stuff.

So, no revolution without a guide, eh?

I dont see a problem with creating a simple text file in the correct folder to get what you want. If that little is too much to ask, we might as well go full hearn.
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
January 16, 2016, 02:29:28 PM
#25
Everyone knows me, Maria OG.

I am the oldest miner of this forum and I must say, we are getting distracted. Who cares if X or Y developer quits. Lets focus on educating about the benefits of virtual currency agains fiat "paper or digital form" currency.

The first mistake that was made was removing the easy mining feature. by doing this, you centralized mining on not only those with the knowledge to mine, but also the equipment needed. If it was left integrated with bitcoin core, than the distribution of the coin would have been by now broader. broader distribution of bitcoin means what we all know it meas.

Lets discuss about this AMA!

Maria

you are a noob, not because of your activity level but just your lack of understanding of bitcoin mining.
lets say mining was left integrated into bitcoin-core.exe rather than allowing separate 'lite' implementation..
it doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure ways around it, not only by faking the .exe relay data to then use on more simplistic systems to then allow multiple systems per user, cheaper than just 1 system.
but also it doesnt take much effort to just buy multiple computers either.
if you next say about limiting IP addresses as another solution.. i would say.. prove that there are 1 million individual miners with individual IP's vs 5 miners with 200,000 ip's each.

no matter what way you implement something and put security to try to create a fair and just system. people will find a way to use it to their advantage.


I think you miss read so ill rephrase. If mining was left in the .exe as you say, then today I noob would download the core and start mining.

You can, just start with -gen=1


Ok, but need to be a [button] that says [Start Mining] right on the main screen of the GUI. Not a hidden command, only designed for computer scientist. not computer consumers. the people who move the mouse around and click on stuff.

Damn, you right! To make mining buttun visible will solve all the problems! Every noob will mine coins on his/her laptop !
It was so easy, and nobody got it! GENIUS!

Its a lottery. The analogy of removing the button is hiding the gas station where your lottery is played and placing somewhere where only a certain few can play the lottery.
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1000
January 16, 2016, 02:26:55 PM
#24
Everyone knows me, Maria OG.

I am the oldest miner of this forum and I must say, we are getting distracted. Who cares if X or Y developer quits. Lets focus on educating about the benefits of virtual currency agains fiat "paper or digital form" currency.

The first mistake that was made was removing the easy mining feature. by doing this, you centralized mining on not only those with the knowledge to mine, but also the equipment needed. If it was left integrated with bitcoin core, than the distribution of the coin would have been by now broader. broader distribution of bitcoin means what we all know it meas.

Lets discuss about this AMA!

Maria

you are a noob, not because of your activity level but just your lack of understanding of bitcoin mining.
lets say mining was left integrated into bitcoin-core.exe rather than allowing separate 'lite' implementation..
it doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure ways around it, not only by faking the .exe relay data to then use on more simplistic systems to then allow multiple systems per user, cheaper than just 1 system.
but also it doesnt take much effort to just buy multiple computers either.
if you next say about limiting IP addresses as another solution.. i would say.. prove that there are 1 million individual miners with individual IP's vs 5 miners with 200,000 ip's each.

no matter what way you implement something and put security to try to create a fair and just system. people will find a way to use it to their advantage.


I think you miss read so ill rephrase. If mining was left in the .exe as you say, then today I noob would download the core and start mining.

You can, just start with -gen=1


Ok, but need to be a [button] that says [Start Mining] right on the main screen of the GUI. Not a hidden command, only designed for computer scientist. not computer consumers. the people who move the mouse around and click on stuff.

Damn, you right! To make mining button visible will solve all the problems! Every noob will mine coins on his/her laptop !
It was so easy, and nobody got it! GENIUS!
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
January 16, 2016, 02:22:50 PM
#23
Everyone knows me, Maria OG.

I am the oldest miner of this forum and I must say, we are getting distracted. Who cares if X or Y developer quits. Lets focus on educating about the benefits of virtual currency agains fiat "paper or digital form" currency.

The first mistake that was made was removing the easy mining feature. by doing this, you centralized mining on not only those with the knowledge to mine, but also the equipment needed. If it was left integrated with bitcoin core, than the distribution of the coin would have been by now broader. broader distribution of bitcoin means what we all know it meas.

Lets discuss about this AMA!

Maria

you are a noob, not because of your activity level but just your lack of understanding of bitcoin mining.
lets say mining was left integrated into bitcoin-core.exe rather than allowing separate 'lite' implementation..
it doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure ways around it, not only by faking the .exe relay data to then use on more simplistic systems to then allow multiple systems per user, cheaper than just 1 system.
but also it doesnt take much effort to just buy multiple computers either.
if you next say about limiting IP addresses as another solution.. i would say.. prove that there are 1 million individual miners with individual IP's vs 5 miners with 200,000 ip's each.

no matter what way you implement something and put security to try to create a fair and just system. people will find a way to use it to their advantage.


I think you miss read so ill rephrase. If mining was left in the .exe as you say, then today I noob would download the core and start mining.

You can, just start with -gen=1


Ok, but need to be a [button] that says [Start Mining] right on the main screen of the GUI. Not a hidden command, only designed for computer scientist. not computer consumers. the people who move the mouse around and click on stuff.
legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1137
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
January 16, 2016, 02:21:54 PM
#22
Maria,

Why the noob account?  What happened to your original account?
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
January 16, 2016, 02:20:10 PM
#21
Everyone knows me, Maria OG.

I am the oldest miner of this forum and I must say, we are getting distracted. Who cares if X or Y developer quits. Lets focus on educating about the benefits of virtual currency agains fiat "paper or digital form" currency.

The first mistake that was made was removing the easy mining feature. by doing this, you centralized mining on not only those with the knowledge to mine, but also the equipment needed. If it was left integrated with bitcoin core, than the distribution of the coin would have been by now broader. broader distribution of bitcoin means what we all know it meas.

Lets discuss about this AMA!

Maria

you are a noob, not because of your activity level but just your lack of understanding of bitcoin mining.
lets say mining was left integrated into bitcoin-core.exe rather than allowing separate 'lite' implementation..
it doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure ways around it, not only by faking the .exe relay data to then use on more simplistic systems to then allow multiple systems per user, cheaper than just 1 system.
but also it doesnt take much effort to just buy multiple computers either.
if you next say about limiting IP addresses as another solution.. i would say.. prove that there are 1 million individual miners with individual IP's vs 5 miners with 200,000 ip's each.

no matter what way you implement something and put security to try to create a fair and just system. people will find a way to use it to their advantage.


I think you miss read so ill rephrase. If mining was left in the .exe as you say, then today I noob would download the core and start mining.

You can, just start with -gen=1
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
January 16, 2016, 02:16:41 PM
#20
Everyone knows me, Maria OG.

I am the oldest miner of this forum and I must say, we are getting distracted. Who cares if X or Y developer quits. Lets focus on educating about the benefits of virtual currency agains fiat "paper or digital form" currency.

The first mistake that was made was removing the easy mining feature. by doing this, you centralized mining on not only those with the knowledge to mine, but also the equipment needed. If it was left integrated with bitcoin core, than the distribution of the coin would have been by now broader. broader distribution of bitcoin means what we all know it meas.

Lets discuss about this AMA!

Maria

you are a noob, not because of your activity level but just your lack of understanding of bitcoin mining.
lets say mining was left integrated into bitcoin-core.exe rather than allowing separate 'lite' implementation..
it doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure ways around it, not only by faking the .exe relay data to then use on more simplistic systems to then allow multiple systems per user, cheaper than just 1 system.
but also it doesnt take much effort to just buy multiple computers either.
if you next say about limiting IP addresses as another solution.. i would say.. prove that there are 1 million individual miners with individual IP's vs 5 miners with 200,000 ip's each.

no matter what way you implement something and put security to try to create a fair and just system. people will find a way to use it to their advantage.


I think you miss read so ill rephrase. If mining was left in the .exe as you say, then today I noob would download the core and start mining. plain and simple and integrated in the whole bitcoin idea. easier to digest and understand as a noob, also makes me feel like im part of the whole generating process. I am proposing no sort of limitation, im suggesting to reimplement coin generating into the core so cpu hashes can join the party and help decentralize the coin generation process. Which is currently mainly in china, not globally distributed in multiple devices the way it should. So the Chinese mining farms will constantly have to compete with the million of laptops also generating coins.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
January 16, 2016, 02:14:13 PM
#19
I very much so agree with this and have wondered if there possibly could be a way that the Bitcoin code could limit maximum hash per connection.

Like in some way make it to where anything over X terrahash per connection would not yield more chance to solve the block and therefore break up the huge pools and farms monopolies and bring back decentralization.

I know it cant be that simple and I don't really know how the code works but I think something like that should be done and also that Bitcoin doesn't really need the ridiculous amount of hashpower that it currently has anyway.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393
You lead and I'll watch you walk away.
January 16, 2016, 02:12:51 PM
#18
Everyone knows me, Maria OG.

I am the oldest miner of this forum and I must say, we are getting distracted. Who cares if X or Y developer quits. Lets focus on educating about the benefits of virtual currency agains fiat "paper or digital form" currency.

The first mistake that was made was removing the easy mining feature. by doing this, you centralized mining on not only those with the knowledge to mine, but also the equipment needed. If it was left integrated with bitcoin core, than the distribution of the coin would have been by now broader. broader distribution of bitcoin means what we all know it meas.

Lets discuss about this AMA!

Maria

you are a noob, not because of your activity level but just your lack of understanding of bitcoin mining.
lets say mining was left integrated into bitcoin-core.exe rather than allowing separate 'lite' implementation..
it doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure ways around it, not only by faking the .exe data to then use on more simplistic systems to then allow multiple systems per user. but also it doesnt take much effort to just buy multiple computers either.
if you next say about limiting IP addresses as another solution.. i would say.. prove that there are 1 million individual miners with individual IP's vs 5 miners with 200,000 ip's each.

no matter what way you implement something and put security to try to create a fair and just system. people will find a way to use it to their advantage.


God damn Frankly! Not everything is a challenge to you intellectually. I was having fun and now you ruined it. Thanks Obama.
legendary
Activity: 4270
Merit: 4534
January 16, 2016, 02:09:44 PM
#17
Everyone knows me, Maria OG.

I am the oldest miner of this forum and I must say, we are getting distracted. Who cares if X or Y developer quits. Lets focus on educating about the benefits of virtual currency agains fiat "paper or digital form" currency.

The first mistake that was made was removing the easy mining feature. by doing this, you centralized mining on not only those with the knowledge to mine, but also the equipment needed. If it was left integrated with bitcoin core, than the distribution of the coin would have been by now broader. broader distribution of bitcoin means what we all know it meas.

Lets discuss about this AMA!

Maria

you are a noob, not because of your activity level but just your lack of understanding of bitcoin mining.
lets say mining was left integrated into bitcoin-core.exe rather than allowing separate 'lite' implementation..
it doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure ways around it, not only by faking the .exe relay data to then use on more simplistic systems to then allow multiple systems per user, cheaper than just 1 system.
but also it doesnt take much effort to just buy multiple computers either.
if you next say about limiting IP addresses as another solution.. i would say.. prove that there are 1 million individual miners with individual IP's vs 5 miners with 200,000 ip's each.

no matter what way you implement something and put security to try to create a fair and just system. people will find a way to use it to their advantage.

as i said even with having mining only work on a bitcoin-core.exe program, that senses it is a full computer. on a unique IP. eventually those that can only afford 1 PC ($400) will lose out to people who can buy 10,000pc's and have IP addresses each.

i think the OP sounds like a noob who is butt hurt that they cannot afford to be part of the petahash level of mining and is trying to assume that a fairer gigahash level per user would be long lasting and fair.
Pages:
Jump to: