Topic: I asked Meta AI two questions about bitcoin (Read 357 times)

The developers cannot possibly programme the software with all possible answers and keep updating that. There are a gazzilion possible questions someone can as AI and the answers can only be gotten from crawling the internet.
Not all questions are facts, some are subjective so there can be different possible corrections and the AI will choose the majority opinion all of the time.

Search up what AD means and all the results say it is Anno Domini, that's where the software gets its answers. It's only commonly used as "After death" in conversations, but almost all research articles term it correctly.

Which doesn't happen when you ask questions that will force the AI to search for subjective and biased information. After the recent massive hype, many people is disappointed with the results to questions like these.

AI is great for other tasks like lab research, creation of drafts,... but when you need more complex answers to questions where critical thinking comes into play, the current results are quite useless, as the OP shows.

I am with you on this, I have known about the fact that AI often messes up with their answer especially when it relies on the recent information that is circulating the internet.  Since there are lots of fake news and misinformation lurking on the internet, any inquiry on AI application that relies directly on the internet will more likely give us mixed information including fake news and wrong information.  And if we dig deeply into the question, this kind of AI will eventually admit that its knowledge is limited and the information it gives maybe wrong.

I think it is much better to use an AI that is fed with verified information and stored in a database, although it might be lagging in updates, at least any question asked has a high chance of being answered correctly.


True that since most AI today's rely on the internet with lots of fake information, using this kind of AI may inevitably spread wrong information to those who are seeking knowledge but are lazy to verify the information they gathered.


It is a no-brainer that people rely on AI for convenience and speed.  It can easily retrieve information from a database and make a piece of complete information regarding the subject matter.  As long as the saved inputs on the database are correct and verified, it will speed up any research and activities several times.

For those who still rely on AI, from this topic the answer can be found that relying on AI can be "dangerous" in terms of finding information because the truth of the information provided can be misleading. Regardless of the form of questions asked by the user.

I am confused why people who are active here still rely on this technology. I mean, AI technology can indeed be helped and I will not ignore it, but not for all lines.

You shouldn't be disappointed because these softwares are being developed by human who are bound to make mistakes. Much should not be expected from it and moreover, if you check their term of service there is disclaimer notice that the software may make mistakes and one should not rely on every information they provided.

I think they are just save for risk free and less important information that is not related to finance. They are meant to provide simple and quick guide in case you have no means to access the right source, they will give clue to what you are looking for. However, the technology is just developing at their early stage and would probably do better as they advance.

You're missing something here making things easier is just similar to improving humanity.

Ai ought not to stand with majority but what's right the dev ought to give them the right data or at least create them in a way they could remember after they're corrected.

Let me give an example, in terms of Calendar many takes AD as After death whereas it means Anno Domini I bet when you ask Ai they'll give Anno Domini as the correct one simply because the dev gave them the right data there for it. See another reason here, why blameis on the dev

Perhaps the goal of AI development is precisely that people become as less creative as possible, that they think as little as possible and that in the end they do exactly what the AI ​​advises them. I personally see it as one of the ways to dehumanize human society in addition to everything that is already present in so-called modern societies.

I can't remember any case in the science fiction where AI and ultimately humanoid robots powered by AI doing anything good for humans - on the contrary, it always ends up very bad. Humans will obviously not rest until they invent something that will be superior to humans, but if you give someone consciousness, then it is only a matter of time when humans will be perceived by those same creatures as a lower species.

The use of AI is something that has already been programmed by some set of people whose pattern of the informations they give were tuned to the conformity of their own taste and standard, this also make it a centralized source of an information in which their opinion, suggestion or given answers may not be accurate, the use of AI is not 100% precise of the exact information or response needed, for those using them, they have their own reasons, but in case of bitcoin, it's more better not to involve the use of AI in any research of information we needed.

Unfortunately, the crypto content on the Internet is bad, and most of the sites that add learning algorithms are bad. If the answers are taken from books, technical forums, and a little content from here, you will get better answers, but since the learning sources are bad, the answers will inevitably be bad.

The thing about AI is that its as good as its source data, and probably this information is presented to us depending on how it ranks on search engines... as AI is just a simplified version of any search engine out there such as Google.
Which is why I tell my friends to seek second opinions from other AIs or go back to googling so that you pick your option out there.

Btw, something I appreciate from the AI used here is that it gives you the link it's pulled it's information from unlike others that will just list stuff in bullet points and call it a day... otherwise not a bad start from Meta probably will get better with time.

Or probably this technology is fairly young and still way beyond what we expect of them. But the thing is that there are social medias who really portray AI as the know it all and that it will take over our traditional jobs.

But this thread just shows that it's not going to happen maybe not in our lifetime as it still needs human to feed it with information and most of the time it's going to messed it up, hence it's not the answers that we wanted to see or hear.

I won't be surprised to see those information that is generated from AI and of course these information are gotten from the website that doesn't give accurate information concerning what they want the AI to passed to. In my opinion AI may mislead lot of people who doesn't have the right knowledge towards bitcoin especially the newbies who eagerly to learn and delv into bitcoin investment.