Pages:
Author

Topic: I been given negative feedback for no important reason (Read 2900 times)

copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
Why would anyone give a negative feedback for no particular reason. I think it is not ethical. It will be a bad example for those people who think that they can get away with anything that they want to do. Let’s not tolerate this kind of behavior.
Why would anyone not read the thread and instead just comment based on the title. I think it is not ethical. It will be a bad example for those people that think that they can get away with any bullshit vague and general post that they want to type. Let's not tolerate this kind of behavior.

Roll Eyes
full member
Activity: 226
Merit: 103
Why would anyone give a negative feedback for no particular reason. I think it is not ethical. It will be a bad example for those people who think that they can get away with anything that they want to do. Let’s not tolerate this kind of behavior.
KWH
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1045
In Collateral I Trust.
i still want to know why my trust is not changing, i have zero scams against me

Your answer is in plain red:

Lauda   2017-06-21   0.00000000   Reference   Trust farming.
EcuaMobi   2017-06-20   0.00000000   Reference   Several red flags: farming trust, trying to offer an escrow service without previous trust, asking for a loan without collateral. Always use an escrow if dealing with this user. Never lend without valid collateral worth more than the loan plus interest
Lone Shark   2017-06-10   0.00000000   Reference   //Trust Farming//

User is operating services for the sole purpose of gaining trust, which may or may not lead to scamming due to trust gain.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
i still want to know why my trust is not changing, i have zero scams against me
full member
Activity: 161
Merit: 100


Wow, just forget about it, no one cares about the trust and haven't sent it started being abused a year or more back. Once they click through, if they care to they will see that it is just some people, a known abuser of the system. 
You are correct, CryptoDevil is a perfect example.....hundreds of negative ratings of others, not one fucking positive rating. Abusing the rating system is all he does. I'm curious if he has ever posted a single positive thing. Over in the Sigt thread he has been exposed as a piece of shit scammer, it fits. The one yelling scam the loudest typically are the biggest scammers around. I'm curious though, who he paid off to not be banned. Hundreds of ridiculous negative ratings, no positives. Is that really the kind of scum this forum holds up on a pedestal?
sr. member
Activity: 588
Merit: 250
right now this user thinks i have asked for loans and i'm trying to scam which i have not or will not even think of doing in the future he has no proof that i will and I think it should be removed as i'm not even a newbie asking for loans either.
Offering to build trust can lead you to the opposite, you do not have to offer trust, trust will come naturally.
Look at this person : https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/iqbal26-896353 got negatif trust because it wants to be escrow.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
I have placed you on ignore for wasting space in my PM box with this matter. A couple of months != several messages in =< 2 months.
so you did tell me that i'd get my negative feedback removed its been 3 months
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
bump still need my feedback removed i'm not suspicious on bct Angry
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Ok now no one is doing anything for me so when can my feedback be removed; i will also bump this everyday because i don't see the point of having negative feedback if i'm not doing anything untrustworthy Angry
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3000
Terminated.
I have placed you on ignore for wasting space in my PM box with this matter. A couple of months != several messages in =< 2 months.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
You obviously do not understand the trust system. I have never removed any feedback on you, nor do I plan to. What happened is that I, for whatever reason, got excluded from DT for a couple of days (?) which made my rating not visible by default (thus not affecting your score by default either). Now that I am back in DT, my rating is visible again.
well you sent me a private message saying you will remove it in a few months, i still have proof if you want me to show you  Undecided
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3000
Terminated.
You obviously do not understand the trust system. I have never removed any feedback on you, nor do I plan to. What happened is that I, for whatever reason, got excluded from DT for a couple of days (?) which made my rating not visible by default (thus not affecting your score by default either). Now that I am back in DT, my rating is visible again.
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 306
i don't understand Lauda removed my feedback yesterday and today my feedback is back on -4 again. is this some sort of glitch on bitcointalk?
Removed, you say?  I still see the trust farming feedback that Lauda left.  I don't see that what you said was all that bad, but you should probably have known that announcing that you're looking to build trust is viewed with suspicion by a lot of people here.  You might in fact be trustworthy,  but one of the tactics scammers use is to farm trust in order to pull off an exit scam.  Oops!  Hopefully you'll learn from that.
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
Maybe a fed.
i don't understand Lauda removed my feedback yesterday and today my feedback is back on -4 again. is this some sort of glitch on bitcointalk?

Did the same thing to me as well, it reppeared as negative after like 5 days though.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
i don't understand Lauda removed my feedback yesterday and today my feedback is back on -4 again. is this some sort of glitch on bitcointalk?
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
However labeling an action before it is confirmed, is kind of extreme.  Its like... Castrating a child because they may give birth to hitler 20 years later.

If we were to tag scammers only after they scammed, this place would be overrun.  Trust is useless once someone has scammed!  It's trivial for a scammer to make a new account and do it again and again.

By recognizing the signs of a potential scam, we tag in advance and stop them from happening.


You are so Full of Shit, we should call you Toilet!



I have scammed no one, the only one pulling the scam is Lauda & Blazed by using their status as DT members to stifle their competition for Escrow services and signature campaigns.

Your DT gang is just a bunch of cheaters that can't compete in an argument or in providing a service unless you smear others with a lying bullshit trust system.

You asshats only neg people you either lose an argument too, or want to stop them from offering a competing service, DT members like you are the lowest form of scum the virtual world has to offer, and you hide behind theymos and those lying ass green trust ratings which are completely worthless to anyone that knows how your  bitscam works.



 Cool
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
However labeling an action before it is confirmed, is kind of extreme.  Its like... Castrating a child because they may give birth to hitler 20 years later.

If we were to tag scammers only after they scammed, this place would be overrun.  Trust is useless once someone has scammed!  It's trivial for a scammer to make a new account and do it again and again.

By recognizing the signs of a potential scam, we tag in advance and stop them from happening.
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
Maybe a fed.
right now this user thinks i have asked for loans

You asked for a $3,500 loan.  That is a pretty important reason!

I think anyone willing to lend someone 3500 without a full doxx and collateral probably needs more help than the community can provide.

However labeling an action before it is confirmed, is kind of extreme.  Its like... Castrating a child because they may give birth to hitler 20 years later.


/Shrug

@iranus
I think you're one of the few neg trust legends I've ever seen lol.
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
No one use traditional Chinese in this forum, so you can see who is pathetic.

Hmm,
I did , you must not be as bright as you claim.
The way you keep trying to talk about my junk, you must be some sort of Chinese pervert.
Are you a LadyBoy?   Cheesy

Sorry not into the freaking hermaphrodite scene, you will have to look elsewhere,
from what I hear Vod is hard up , try him. You could be his madama butterfly.  Lips sealed


 Cool



If you're really as old as you say you are, is this all you have to do with your time?

Fighting over and over again with a stranger over some petty dispute on a forum for cryptocurrencies?  Coming up with loads of bullshit methods to attack the forum for your personal dispute?  Are you really that pathetic?

If so, I feel sorry for you.

The trust system is screwed up, but the main way to fix it is to change your trust list and not include Lauda or hilariousandco on it if you hate them that much...

Here let me modify that for you .

If you're really are younger than me ,  is this all you have to do with your time, is read what I type?

Watching an 84 year old Fight over and over again with a Gang of DT thugs.

If so, I feel sorry for you. Go the Fuck outside , make love to a woman.
Get the Fuck away from the keyboard.

Oh , one more thing shut the fuck up about how I spent my time, it is really none of your damn business ,
I suggest you worry more about yourself than me , nancy.

If anyone is pathetic it is your whiny ass, don't read the damn forum.

You admit : The trust system is screwed up.
I think the way to bring down lies is to shine the light on it.
and I got the time so shine shine this little light of mine.

Don't like it , don't read it and go cry over something else, your generation is too damn sensitive.


 Cool
Pages:
Jump to: