I bet that this it NOT Satoshi Nakamoto - page 2.

CryptoPanda

sr. member

Activity: 910

Merit: 302

Quote from: rohnearner on March 07, 2014, 04:38:16 AM

This was the result after I voted:
Yes    - 22 (21.8%)
No    - 79 (78.2%)

I just want to ask those 22people(21.8%) that what makes them think that he's real Satoshi Nakamoto ..! I'm not trying to prove anything but I want to know there perspective too..! Want to know how strong there claims are.! Because Most of the info i gathered is from this forum and everyone here is claiming he's not satoshi .. and i can understand they have enough substance in their claims. so I believe so , but want to know more , someones perspective who thinks he's real

None of them can say anything solid. To be honest it's better if we don't know who is he. Makes the hype bigger.

rohnearner

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 252

REAL-EYES || REAL-IZE || REAL-LIES||

This was the result after I voted:
Yes    - 22 (21.8%)
No    - 79 (78.2%)

I just want to ask those 22people(21.8%) that what makes them think that he's real Satoshi Nakamoto ..! I'm not trying to prove anything but I want to know there perspective too..! Want to know how strong there claims are.! Because Most of the info i gathered is from this forum and everyone here is claiming he's not satoshi .. and i can understand they have enough substance in their claims. so I believe so , but want to know more , someones perspective who thinks he's real

MrPiggles

sr. member

Activity: 980

Merit: 256

Decentralized Ascending Auctions on Blockchain

I'd love to share the story of how i once set up a thing and left a trail pointing to someone who'd run a similar thing before.

But I can't.

Not surprised Satoshi did this, I hope he at least paid the guy though. I did it to screw someone royally (which I did) if he never paid this Dorian guy I feel for him.

RobFordWotWot

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

time

This is the real deal.

BTCeelieve

retrend

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 251

Leah should have asked for his private key saying as he was so keen to give away secrets.

Light

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 502

Circa 2010

Quote from: CryptoPanda on March 07, 2014, 03:12:42 AM

yeah i meant if he said that from that old account
with pgp would be better of course, becasue I imagine the admin of the site could write from this acc as well

With an old account there is always a possibility that someone hacked the account (although unlikely). However it would be next to impossible to steal a private key from Satoshi meaning that is the optimal means of proof.

CryptoPanda

sr. member

Activity: 910

Merit: 302

yeah i meant if he said that from that old account
with pgp would be better of course, becasue I imagine the admin of the site could write from this acc as well

Light

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 502

Circa 2010

Even if he claimed it, there is no proof yet to show it is true. I could just as easily claim to be Jesus but without proof it's just a speculative claim. Aside from an old account verifying it or a signed message fro one of his keys it is unconfirmable.

CryptoPanda

sr. member

Activity: 910

Merit: 302

yes, completely agree

even if he is or isn't he will always say he isn't

but if he admitted that's him that would have proven the story, so far the story is just a speculation

Light

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 502

Circa 2010

It doesn't necessarily prove or disprove anything. Pretend if he was for a moment the real Satoshi, anyone in their right mind would distance themselves from being Satoshi as the media will constantly on your tail if not people with more malicious motives. The best way to distance is to deny, both Dorian himself and using the P2P account to deny.

On the other hand, if he wasn't Satoshi the real Satoshi would also deny Dorian being the guy as a) his privacy will be destroyed b) people believing Dorian to be Satoshi would still come after him.

In both cases the most logical move is to deny so there is no proof or otherwise to the claim.

CryptoPanda

sr. member

Activity: 910

Merit: 302

Quote from: CryptoPanda on March 06, 2014, 01:27:33 PM

I speculate that in the next several days something will be revealed that will exclude the Mr in the news from the potential founders of Bitcoin.

So I was right. And it took less than 24 hours, not several days.
http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/2014/03/07/breaking-satoshi-nakomoto-breaks-long-silence-deny-dorian-nakomoto/

Too bad nobody bet me

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Simply put, no.
He isn't the only person in the world called Satoshi Nakamoto either.

greenlion

hero member

Activity: 667

Merit: 500

The reporter was committed to a certain theory and narrative from the get-go and shoehorned everything possible to clumsily fit that story, culminating in a creepy delusionally-reported in-person confrontation.

Omega0255

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: HorseCoin on March 06, 2014, 02:53:35 PM

i almost got a heart attack when i thought that Satoshi Nakamoto was an anagram for Nintendo, but thankfully it's NOT!!

mario coins, bitcoins, connection??

!

Why hasn't there been a altcoin called "MarioCoins" yet?!

wobber

legendary

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Realpra on March 06, 2014, 02:57:37 PM

We know that the real Satoshi reset the timestamps on his communication to +0 GMT as well as other things to stay hidden - why would such a person use his real name? Even a real name not used in 40 years would still be easily-ish trackable.

Do you have any other examples of Satoshi's measures to remain anonymous?

Realpra

hero member

Activity: 815

Merit: 1000

The criteria "fits unknown age, is programmer, is smart, writes english and is reclusive" fits an awful lot of people in this world. (Hal Finney thought Satoshi was young btw.)

We know that the real Satoshi reset the timestamps on his communication to +0 GMT as well as other things to stay hidden - why would such a person use his real name? Even a real name not used in 40 years would still be easily-ish trackable.

This is speculation of my own, but I can't help thinking that the real Satoshi is called something that has nothing to do with "Satoshi Nakamoto".

I know even a genius is not infallible, but his OWN name while trying to stay hidden? Why? Might as well move the Satoshi coins straight to a passport verified exchange account and check out to his personal bank account!

I'll believe it when the name is "Bob Hansen"/"Cheng Hui" and was found via the email/github trail and mail server/NSA records and the person in question is caught with some incriminating evidence - such as known Satoshi private keys.

HorseCoin

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

i almost got a heart attack when i thought that Satoshi Nakamoto was an anagram for Nintendo, but thankfully it's NOT!!

mario coins, bitcoins, connection??

!

rat

sr. member

Activity: 253

Merit: 250

Quote from: Mike Christ on March 06, 2014, 02:47:51 PM

Quote from: rat on March 06, 2014, 02:41:30 PM

not like this.

you don't dox like this.

there would be great legal liablity for newsweek.

grow the fuck up, and absorb the obvious.

fucking tinfoil hat shit is off the chain in this forum.

grasp reality for once.

There was great legal liability for MtGox to not fuck up; therefore they did no wrong, correct?

they are not the media...lol...the logic here is epic.

Raize

donator

Activity: 1419

Merit: 1015

No. It's not our Satoshi Nakamoto.

Quote from: franky1 on March 06, 2014, 01:59:28 PM

forbes took down their article, they dont believe it either...

Unfortunately they are still running these though:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2014/03/06/the-outing-of-bitcoin-creator-satoshi-nakamoto-is-brilliant-journalism/
http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2014/03/06/bitcoin-community-responds-to-satoshi-nakamotos-outing-with-disbelief-anger-fascination/

Unless they independently verified what this Mr Nakamoto said, Kashmir and Andy should be ashamed.

spazzdla

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: rat on March 06, 2014, 02:41:30 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: rat on March 06, 2014, 01:32:43 PM

the freelancer and the editor wouldn't make that claim, with a headline, and take a gamble like that.

I don't know what planet you live on, but here on Earth "reporters" and "news" companies constantly make huge, glaring mistakes in their "reporting".

not like this.

you don't dox like this.

there would be great legal liablity for newsweek.

grow the fuck up, and absorb the obvious.

fucking tinfoil hat shit is off the chain in this forum.

grasp reality for once.

LOL. I don't care who Satoshi is, so don't get all bent out of shape. I'm simply saying that reporters can't be trusted. Believe what you want, I don't give a rat's ass. Wink

No one can be trusted, hence bitcoin;).

.

Topic: I bet that this it NOT Satoshi Nakamoto - page 2. (Read 3692 times)