Pages:
Author

Topic: i got negative trust without any reason :( (Read 1868 times)

sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
November 28, 2016, 03:37:15 AM
#25
In this forum you can not expect anything else. There are so many trust abusers here who will abuse you and will call you the same .

Look clearly before making any statement.

I have already looked. May be you need to wear spectacles .

All accounts were enrolled in  same signature campaign that has a special rule: - "No alts allowed" and he still joined it without noticing rules. And by joining signature campaign, participant agrees to follow every rule which he didn't.

Feedback is accurate and there is no doubt about it.

In this forum you can not expect anything else. There are so many trust abusers here who will abuse you and will call you the same .

Look clearly before making any statement.

I thought , DT member only will give red trust rating only if they doing scam activity

Is scamming is the only reason for a red trust?  Roll Eyes one might be cheating giveaway also. There are pretty many ways in which users have got a red trust.



I think you have lost it. No alt accounts means I do not have authority to post from any other alt account which I followed seriously.

Giveaway cheat is also a scam and it can be mentioned there.
legendary
Activity: 3094
Merit: 1472
November 28, 2016, 03:32:12 AM
#24
In this forum you can not expect anything else. There are so many trust abusers here who will abuse you and will call you the same .

Look clearly before making any statement.

I have already looked. May be you need to wear spectacles .

All accounts were enrolled in  same signature campaign that has a special rule: - "No alts allowed" and he still joined it without noticing rules. And by joining signature campaign, participant agrees to follow every rule which he didn't.

Feedback is accurate and there is no doubt about it.

In this forum you can not expect anything else. There are so many trust abusers here who will abuse you and will call you the same .

Look clearly before making any statement.

I thought , DT member only will give red trust rating only if they doing scam activity

Is scamming is the only reason for a red trust?  Roll Eyes one might be cheating giveaway also. There are pretty many ways in which users have got a red trust.

legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1026
Free WSPU2 Token or real dollars
November 28, 2016, 03:20:54 AM
#23
Do not worry...one can live with negative red trust.
My members see from themselves that I'm honnest and was always honest.
My members see that my systems were always and are real economical systems.

Without any reason certainly  does not exist...
For me the reason was that people trust negatively if they do not understand a system even if the system is honest.
It is hard for some people to understand that a webmaster can offer satoshi to investors.

Say I offer satoshi for free...you are red trusted because people have electricity cost and electricity is not free.
Say I offer satoshi if you pay 0.001BTC...you are red truted because people say you are a ponzi runner.

You can do something and it's opposite...for both you are redtrusted...

Advice:
Never say this forum is for free...because you have electricity cost...(lol)

Never say by winspiral's u2 system you earn for free because you spend electricity and time...you will be red trusted for promoting lies...best is for you to take the free satoshi and say nothing like 300 people or so do.

legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1015
November 28, 2016, 03:18:18 AM
#22
In this forum you can not expect anything else. There are so many trust abusers here who will abuse you and will call you the same .

Look clearly before making any statement.

I thought , DT member only will give red trust rating only if they doing scam activity
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
November 28, 2016, 03:16:17 AM
#21
In this forum you can not expect anything else. There are so many trust abusers here who will abuse you and will call you the same .

Look clearly before making any statement.

I have already looked. May be you need to wear spectacles .
legendary
Activity: 3094
Merit: 1472
November 28, 2016, 03:08:14 AM
#20
In this forum you can not expect anything else. There are so many trust abusers here who will abuse you and will call you the same .

Look clearly before making any statement.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
November 23, 2016, 04:51:45 AM
#19
-snip-

Am still investigating...  Second from the top jitender matches the email of JITENDERPAR3

For the moment, I am throwing the two kreetika into the doubtful due to the MMM Global - unless JITENDERPAR3 wants to say they are his?   Roll Eyes

Done mate  Cheesy

You can find his alts connected here : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16962940

Account Farmer , huff!!  Embarrassed

Good catch there with the connections and the banning from the signature campaign back in January.
legendary
Activity: 3094
Merit: 1472
November 23, 2016, 04:35:18 AM
#18
-snip-

Am still investigating...  Second from the top jitender matches the email of JITENDERPAR3

For the moment, I am throwing the two kreetika into the doubtful due to the MMM Global - unless JITENDERPAR3 wants to say they are his?   Roll Eyes

Done mate  Cheesy

You can find his alts connected here : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16962940

Account Farmer , huff!!  Embarrassed
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
November 17, 2016, 01:56:10 AM
#17
Have found this many so far:

Code:
Offline 	jitenderbhai 							Brand new 	2011-06-01 	0 	
Offline jitender [email protected] Brand new 2014-02-24 0
Offline JITENDERKADYAN Brand new 2015-10-24 0
Offline Jitenderglobal Brand new 2015-10-30 0
Offline JITENDERPAR Member 2015-11-20 123
Offline JITENDERPAR2 Member 2015-11-23 64
Offline JITENDERPAR3 [email protected] Full Member 2015-11-23 490

Offline jitender4 Brand new 2016-01-15 0
Offline jitenderpar5 Brand new 2016-01-15 0
Offline jitenderpar4 Brand new 2016-01-15 0
Offline jitenderpar6 Brand new 2016-01-15 0
Offline jitenderpar7 Brand new 2016-01-15 0
Offline jitenderpar8 Brand new 2016-01-15 0
Offline jitenderpar9 Brand new 2016-01-15 0
Offline jitenderpar10 Brand new 2016-01-15 0
Offline jitenderpar11 Brand new 2016-01-15 0
Offline jitenderpar12 Brand new 2016-01-15 0
Offline jitenderpar20 Brand new 2016-01-16 0
Offline jitender920 Brand new 2016-01-16 0
Offline jitenderpar15 Brand new 2016-01-16 0
Offline jitenderpar16 Brand new 2016-01-16 0
Offline jitenderpar17 Brand new 2016-01-16 0
Offline jitenderpar18 Brand new 2016-01-16 0
Offline jitenderpar19 Brand new 2016-01-16 0
Offline jitenderpar22 Brand new 2016-01-16 0
Offline jitenderpar23 Brand new 2016-01-16 0
Offline jitenderpar24 Brand new 2016-01-16 0
Offline JITENDER PAL SINGH Brand new 2016-10-23 0

Offline kreetika MMM Global Brand new 2015-11-24 0
Offline kreetika2 MMM Global Brand new 2015-11-30 0

Am still investigating...  Second from the top jitender matches the email of JITENDERPAR3

For the moment, I am throwing the two kreetika into the doubtful due to the MMM Global - unless JITENDERPAR3 wants to say they are his?   Roll Eyes
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 100
November 06, 2016, 10:10:19 AM
#16
now i got a proof , if all the accounts were banned then how this ac " jitenderpar3" is active .
Good question actually, since you admitted to creating these (albeit just now) and at least 1 was banned before, ergo this is ban evasion. Almost all of those accounts had spammy half one liners.

it means negative trust Should be remove by  mr. lauda
No, I should not remove this rating. It is well deserved and now you got caught in an outright lie.

Normal moderators can't ban people (right?), and I'm sure whoever nuked those accounts probably didn't want to bother someone just to get you banned. Only digging your self into a deeper hole.
Patrollers can nuke newbies, but only administrators and some* global moderators can ban users of higher ranks. I nuked some, and then Cyrus should have started investigating the others (no update on this yet). Take a look at this:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/jitenderpar-658444 JITENDERPAR
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/jitenderpar2-661926 JITENDERPAR2

First one has two negative ratings.
jitenderpar2 was created by me but on that time i gaves this account to my friend and i was no longer user of tgis account .
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 100
November 06, 2016, 10:02:01 AM
#15
now i got a proof , if all the accounts were banned then how this ac " jitenderpar3" is active . it should also be banned but not banned by the forum because it was only the account which was only handle by me  and non of them was getted by me .
Back to lying, I see. (archive of the thread, to this point)

Lauda stated that the accounts were nuked. Only newbies can be nuked. Normal moderators can't ban people (right?), and I'm sure whoever nuked those accounts probably didn't want to bother someone just to get you banned. Only digging your self into a deeper hole.


it means negative trust Should be remove by  mr. lauda
So if I was supposed to be arrested, but they failed to arrest me for whatever reason, I am no longer guilty of my crimes?
you are right but for what , i am fully honest Sad
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
November 06, 2016, 09:57:08 AM
#14
now i got a proof , if all the accounts were banned then how this ac " jitenderpar3" is active .
Good question actually, since you admitted to creating these (albeit just now) and at least 1 was banned before, ergo this is ban evasion. Almost all of those accounts had spammy half one liners.

it means negative trust Should be remove by  mr. lauda
No, I should not remove this rating. It is well deserved and now you got caught in an outright lie.

Normal moderators can't ban people (right?), and I'm sure whoever nuked those accounts probably didn't want to bother someone just to get you banned. Only digging your self into a deeper hole.
Patrollers can nuke newbies, but only administrators and some* global moderators can ban users of higher ranks. I nuked some, and then Cyrus should have started investigating the others (no update on this yet). Take a look at this:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/jitenderpar-658444 JITENDERPAR
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/jitenderpar2-661926 JITENDERPAR2

First one has two negative ratings.
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
November 06, 2016, 09:52:35 AM
#13
now i got a proof , if all the accounts were banned then how this ac " jitenderpar3" is active . it should also be banned but not banned by the forum because it was only the account which was only handle by me  and non of them was getted by me .
Back to lying, I see. (archive of the thread, to this point)

Lauda stated that the accounts were nuked. Only newbies can be nuked. Normal moderators can't ban people (right?), and I'm sure whoever nuked those accounts probably didn't want to bother someone just to get you banned. Only digging your self into a deeper hole.


it means negative trust Should be remove by  mr. lauda
So if I was supposed to be arrested, but they failed to arrest me for whatever reason, I am no longer guilty of my crimes?
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 100
November 06, 2016, 09:51:53 AM
#12
since i am fully honest here
So you admit having nuked/banned alt accounts, which would make your actions here ban evasion and hence a reason to get your account banned aswell.
To be honest, that feedback from Lauda should be the least of your worries right now.



it should also be banned but not banned by the forum
We can agree to that.
it means negative trust Should be remove by  mr. lauda
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 100
November 06, 2016, 09:42:33 AM
#11
PM from user admitting this:
I suggest you get used to the pretty red paint you're wearing, because it isn't going anywhere.
Indeed.

The rating is well deserved, and the fact that you don't know the right section for this type of threads tells us enough.
now i got a proof , if all the accounts were banned then how this ac " jitenderpar3" is active . it should also be banned but not banned by the forum because it was only the account which was only handle by me  and non of them was getted by me .
copper member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
November 06, 2016, 09:39:13 AM
#10
since i am fully honest here
So you admit having nuked/banned alt accounts, which would make your actions here ban evasion and hence a reason to get your account banned aswell.
To be honest, that feedback from Lauda should be the least of your worries right now.



it should also be banned but not banned by the forum
We can agree to that.
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 100
November 06, 2016, 09:34:23 AM
#9
PM from user admitting this:
I suggest you get used to the pretty red paint you're wearing, because it isn't going anywhere.
Indeed.

The rating is well deserved, and the fact that you don't know the right section for this type of threads tells us enough.
since i am fully honest here but here i think i need to give some proof but what i need to show Sad

any help or suggestion Sad
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
November 06, 2016, 08:54:38 AM
#8
PM from user admitting this:
I suggest you get used to the pretty red paint you're wearing, because it isn't going anywhere.
Indeed.

The rating is well deserved, and the fact that you don't know the right section for this type of threads tells us enough.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Ooh, shiny things!!
November 06, 2016, 08:35:04 AM
#7
i think you need to see the post , activity and last active date , which is public for everyone .
every account has 0 activity , zero post , mid of January and comes no active .

then how anyone can say i am making many account ,. means of account farming .

So you're saying you didn't create all those other accounts with the same name?  Then you bought your account and you surely won't mind telling us who you bought it from  Wink
no , accounts were created by me but not recover by me due to my foolness . and see no. of post activity whuch are all zero and i think it iw going for a year .

All those accounts were created on the same day and within an hour of each other.  7 accounts within 1 hour.  And you tell us you're not a farmer???

Seems legit  Roll Eyes

I suggest you get used to the pretty red paint you're wearing, because it isn't going anywhere.
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 100
November 06, 2016, 08:29:13 AM
#6
i think you need to see the post , activity and last active date , which is public for everyone .
every account has 0 activity , zero post , mid of January and comes no active .

then how anyone can say i am making many account ,. means of account farming .

So you're saying you didn't create all those other accounts with the same name?  Then you bought your account and you surely won't mind telling us who you bought it from  Wink
no , accounts were created by me but not recover by me due to my foolness . and see no. of post activity whuch are all zero and i think it iw going for a year .
Pages:
Jump to: